Bernie Sanders
Related: About this forum"The bankers and their guests filed into a large room and turned their eyes to Hillary Clinton"
Looks like we have a good indicator of the contents of at least one of her Wall St speeches. Also makes clear that the fees were not "what they offered," but what she demanded--not that one is much better than the other.
Ordinarily these masters of the universe might have groaned at the idea of a politician taking the microphone. In the contentious years since the crash of 2008, theyve grown wearily accustomed to being called nameslabeled fat cats" by President Obama and worse by those on the leftand gotten used to being largely shunned by Tea Party Republicans for their association with the Washington establishment. And of course there are all those infuriating new rules and regulations, culminating this week with the imposition of the so-called Volcker Rule to make risky trades by big banks illegal.
But Clinton offered a message that the collected plutocrats found reassuring, according to accounts offered by several attendees, declaring that the banker-bashing so popular within both political parties was unproductive and indeed foolish. Striking a soothing note on the global financial crisis, she told the audience, in effect: We all got into this mess together, and were all going to have to work together to get out of it. What the bankers heard her to say was just what they would hope for from a prospective presidential candidate: Beating up the finance industry isnt going to improve the economyit needs to stop. And indeed Goldmans Tim ONeill, who heads the banks asset management business, introduced Clinton by saying how courageous she was for speaking at the bank. (Brave, perhaps, but also well-compensated: Clintons minimum fee for paid remarks is $200,000).
Certainly, Clinton offered the money menand, yes, they are mostly menat Goldmans HQ a bit of a morale boost. It was like, Heres someone who doesnt want to vilify us but wants to get business back in the game, said an attendee. Like, maybe heres someone who can lead us out of the wilderness.
Clintons remarks were hardly a sweeping absolution for the sins of Wall Street, whose leaders she courted assiduously for financial support over a decade, as a senator and a presidential candidate in 2008. But they did register as a repudiation of some of the angry anti-Wall Street rhetoric emanating from liberals rallying behind the likes of Sens. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) and Sherrod Brown (D-Ohio). And perhaps even more than that, Clintons presence offered a glimpse to a future in which Wall Street might repair its frayed political relationships.
Full article: http://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2013/12/wall-street-white-house-republicans-lament-of-the-plutocrats-101047
roguevalley
(40,656 posts)SoapBox
(18,791 posts)Meaning how to rape and pillage all us little people.
No wonder Mr. Creep CEO (what's his name at Goldman) said Bernie is "dangerous".
kristopher
(29,798 posts)I wonder if that was a paraphrase of this:
"What the bankers heard her to say was just what they would hope for from a prospective presidential candidate: Beating up the finance industry isnt going to improve the economyit needs to stop."
CharlotteVale
(2,717 posts)hurt little feelings.
So much for their victims, huh?
FailureToCommunicate
(14,014 posts)zentrum
(9,865 posts)
with her connections, to polish up their image as they all fed at the trough, stroke their poor egos and make all the lobbyists in DC look like benign helpers as they craft legislation that keeps moving our wealth up, up and ever up into 1% coffers.
I now remember Blankfein himself saying something like thisthat people should feel bad for the "poor" vilified rich. Poor guy, just a victim of "innuendo".