Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
19 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Sincere question: how do you know if a persistent poster is a paid shill? (Original Post) mac56 Apr 2016 OP
You can't, and if you worry about it.... daleanime Apr 2016 #1
That's easy TrueDemVA Apr 2016 #2
in 2008, the shoe was on the other foot. Baobab Apr 2016 #17
I think it's like anything on the internet. dogman Apr 2016 #3
This seems to be the election that people are using social media, blogs, discussion LiberalArkie Apr 2016 #4
Well, my guess... Scootaloo Apr 2016 #5
In this bunch Old Codger Apr 2016 #11
most are doing it for free Viva_La_Revolution Apr 2016 #6
Unfortunately, there's no way of knowing. SheilaT Apr 2016 #7
Bingo Old Codger Apr 2016 #9
It's not hard to figure out who the paid ones are. floriduck Apr 2016 #8
All I know is, what a shitty job that would be. Juicy_Bellows Apr 2016 #10
Broken English isn't a surefire sign nxylas Apr 2016 #12
Hillary does not pay her interns, doubt if she will pay trolls. Downwinder Apr 2016 #13
Lol! But Brock on the other hand.... jillan Apr 2016 #14
What industries would benefit from a particular candidate winning? Baobab Apr 2016 #18
One candidate in particular will benefit all of them and US. Downwinder Apr 2016 #19
Hillary is well known to use astroturfing Lone_Wolf Apr 2016 #15
It varies from site to site Baobab Apr 2016 #16

TrueDemVA

(250 posts)
2. That's easy
Sat Apr 2, 2016, 02:51 PM
Apr 2016

If they are in the Hillary group and they never respond to an actual question, instead they just try to insult you or correct your grammar, or never state fact, just spit out misinformation and outright lies, then they are probably a shill/troll.

Unfortunately, that is a lot of people in that group.

dogman

(6,073 posts)
3. I think it's like anything on the internet.
Sat Apr 2, 2016, 02:52 PM
Apr 2016

You have to use your own judgement. Look for patterns mainly. A paid shill is not always bad if they can contribute actual information to the subject. You just really have to check their veracity and look at how persistently they push their meme. Also shilling is shilling, does it matter if they are paid?

LiberalArkie

(15,730 posts)
4. This seems to be the election that people are using social media, blogs, discussion
Sat Apr 2, 2016, 02:53 PM
Apr 2016

systems to gain information. Probably the first really. So naturally the campaigns are now spending money to pay people to post favorable articles for their candidate or to get the other candidates supporters removed from the system.

I don't know how one could tell really. Probably someone a lot smarter than me has found out and there are a lot of smart ones in this group.

 

Scootaloo

(25,699 posts)
5. Well, my guess...
Sat Apr 2, 2016, 02:53 PM
Apr 2016

Is that people whose registration date is over a decade ago, they have 30 posts to their name, and the last time they posted was 2008, seems to be a giveaway.

For most of them though? I can't imagine anyone actually PAYING for that kind of quality.

 

Old Codger

(4,205 posts)
11. In this bunch
Sat Apr 2, 2016, 03:18 PM
Apr 2016
http://www.democraticunderground.com/12511631585


One of the posters has 6 posts in 13 years, that might be an indication, also empty journal, at this point no way to tell which side they favor but pretty odd
 

SheilaT

(23,156 posts)
7. Unfortunately, there's no way of knowing.
Sat Apr 2, 2016, 02:55 PM
Apr 2016

What I have noticed, since someone else pointed this out a few weeks ago, that a surprising number of the most vocal, vicious, and childish of the Hillarybots have an account that goes back several years, but the majority of posts have been made in the past few weeks. It's really quite strange.

Why someone would have gotten an account four, six, or eight plus years ago, essentially abandoned it, and come back only now? Are these people who actually planned ahead in case they wanted to behave like this? Or did someone set up a bunch of accounts a while back and then gives the sign-in information to people for this use?

 

Old Codger

(4,205 posts)
9. Bingo
Sat Apr 2, 2016, 03:01 PM
Apr 2016

Started the phony accounts previously just so they could post trash and not worry about being tomb stoned or banned as they have several of them.

 

floriduck

(2,262 posts)
8. It's not hard to figure out who the paid ones are.
Sat Apr 2, 2016, 02:57 PM
Apr 2016

Your best bet is to put them on ignore. They're usually the bitter ones who post numerous negative posts with links attached.

nxylas

(6,440 posts)
12. Broken English isn't a surefire sign
Sat Apr 2, 2016, 03:22 PM
Apr 2016

America is the world's melting pot, and there's nothing inherently suspicious about a Clinton supporter not having English as their first language. But knowing that the Clinton campaign has paid for the services of click farms in the developing world still makes it something of a red flag for me.

Downwinder

(12,869 posts)
19. One candidate in particular will benefit all of them and US.
Sat Apr 2, 2016, 06:31 PM
Apr 2016

If people have no money in their pockets, all industry suffers. If people have money to spend, everyone benefits.

For once, Cash Flow is the solution.

It has been trickling for too long, it is time to let it flow.

Baobab

(4,667 posts)
16. It varies from site to site
Sat Apr 2, 2016, 05:20 PM
Apr 2016

And without some magic which i don't have, you never know with 100% certainty.

Especially if a site's management are in on it.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Bernie Sanders»Sincere question: how do ...