Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
15 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

Bjornsdotter

(6,123 posts)
1. Are they just getting the 2008 results?
Tue May 10, 2016, 06:13 PM
May 2016

Since you have waded into that cesspool, taking one for the team, let us know what they are saying.

 

silvershadow

(10,336 posts)
3. Kornacki basically said Bernie could sweep the rest and not overtake Clinton. With no mention
Tue May 10, 2016, 06:16 PM
May 2016

that neither would have enough to win nomination.

dana_b

(11,546 posts)
9. bet they're not saying that IF that happens...
Tue May 10, 2016, 06:20 PM
May 2016

that Bernie should have the momentum and the proof that he is a better candidate than Hillary and the Supers should then turn their votes to him. Nope - that would be the TRUTH!

grasswire

(50,130 posts)
12. YES YES YES
Tue May 10, 2016, 06:31 PM
May 2016

I noticed that immediately.

He did not say that neither would have the nom.

Also, he had the super delegates included in the total for HRC.

Time for us to start lighting up his twitter.

LiberalArkie

(15,728 posts)
4. Pointing out how Bernie is ahead in the states to come than Obama was in the same state.
Tue May 10, 2016, 06:17 PM
May 2016

If that makes sense. I think they are hedging their bets since HRC was supposed to beat Obama also.

LiberalArkie

(15,728 posts)
7. Kornaki on MSNBC showing Clinton having 67% of W VA to Obamas 26% in 2008
Tue May 10, 2016, 06:18 PM
May 2016

CNN was doing the same thing earlier.

oldandhappy

(6,719 posts)
13. filling time
Tue May 10, 2016, 06:32 PM
May 2016

Have a lot of time to fill since polls don't close until the end of the day but the 'coverage' begins early in the day. ha ha ha

HereSince1628

(36,063 posts)
14. I haven't watched MSNBC coverage, he seemed hopped up all evening.
Wed May 11, 2016, 07:52 AM
May 2016

Very turned on by crossover mischief in WV and a meaningless dem presidential primary in Nebraska.

His analysis? Well, I'd call it energetic.


 

senz

(11,945 posts)
15. All MSM pro-Hill reporting comes off crooked and underhanded.
Wed May 11, 2016, 12:35 PM
May 2016

I see it repeatedly. They bend and contort the facts, leave out vital information about both candidates' chances, push Hill, just push her and push her and try to bury Bernie.

I hope they get their comeuppance. I will not feel sorry for anything that befalls that side.

Truly, she is Trojan Horse that is being foisted off on us. I think the only reason Trump was able to sail to victory was that the MSM thought he would be easiest for Hill to beat.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Bernie Sanders»Weird talk on MSNBC.