Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
deminks
deminks's Journal
deminks's Journal
May 25, 2015
At least one small slice of the American public looks forward to the non-stop, sleazy political advertisements set to inundate viewers during the 2016 elections: media executives and their investors.
Peter Liguori, the chief executive of Tribune Company, said earlier this month that the next presidential campaign presents enormous opportunity for advertising sales. Speaking at a conference hosted by J.P. Morgan Chase, Liguori, whose company owns television stations, referenced Super PAC spending as a key factor for why he thinks Tribune Co. political advertising revenue will rocket from $115 million in 2012 to about $200 million for the 2016 campaign cycle.
(snip)
In 2012, Les Moonves, president and chief executive of CBS, memorably said, Super PACs may be bad for America, but theyre very good for CBS.
His views appear unchanged. In a February investor call, Moonves predicted strong growth with the help of political spending, particularly on television. He added dryly, looking ahead, the 2016 presidential election is right around the corner and, thank God, the rancor has already begun.
(snip)
In spite of declining television advertising revenue expected this year, credit rating agencies recently gave broadcast companies a sunny two-year outlook. The reason, Carl Salas, Moodys senior credit officer, told the Los Angeles Times, is that political ad spending is expected to boom next year thanks in large part to the Citizens United decision. Political advertising revenue defies gravity, Salas remarked.
(end snip)
The clown car raises money for the MEdia in the end, and the more the merrier.
Media Executives Are Salivating Over Big Money Flooding the 2016 Election Cycle
https://firstlook.org/theintercept/2015/05/22/one-group-americans-drool-wall-wall-presidential-campaign-ads-next-year-media-companies/At least one small slice of the American public looks forward to the non-stop, sleazy political advertisements set to inundate viewers during the 2016 elections: media executives and their investors.
Peter Liguori, the chief executive of Tribune Company, said earlier this month that the next presidential campaign presents enormous opportunity for advertising sales. Speaking at a conference hosted by J.P. Morgan Chase, Liguori, whose company owns television stations, referenced Super PAC spending as a key factor for why he thinks Tribune Co. political advertising revenue will rocket from $115 million in 2012 to about $200 million for the 2016 campaign cycle.
(snip)
In 2012, Les Moonves, president and chief executive of CBS, memorably said, Super PACs may be bad for America, but theyre very good for CBS.
His views appear unchanged. In a February investor call, Moonves predicted strong growth with the help of political spending, particularly on television. He added dryly, looking ahead, the 2016 presidential election is right around the corner and, thank God, the rancor has already begun.
(snip)
In spite of declining television advertising revenue expected this year, credit rating agencies recently gave broadcast companies a sunny two-year outlook. The reason, Carl Salas, Moodys senior credit officer, told the Los Angeles Times, is that political ad spending is expected to boom next year thanks in large part to the Citizens United decision. Political advertising revenue defies gravity, Salas remarked.
(end snip)
The clown car raises money for the MEdia in the end, and the more the merrier.
Profile Information
Member since: Thu Oct 28, 2004, 11:20 AMNumber of posts: 11,014