Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

bananas

bananas's Journal
bananas's Journal
July 7, 2015

Scientists Warn Giant Nuclear Sarcophagus in Marshall Islands Is Leaking

http://www.truthdig.com/eartotheground/item/scientists_warn_nuclear_sarcophagus_in_marshall_islands_is_leaking_20150703

Scientists Warn Giant Nuclear Sarcophagus in Marshall Islands Is Leaking
Posted on Jul 3, 2015



Runit Dome was built to store radioactive soil scraped from the various contaminated Enewetak Atoll islands. (U.S. Defense Special Weapons Agency)


One hundred and eleven thousand cubic yards of radioactive debris lie within Runit Dome in the Marshall Islands, a “hulking legacy of years of U.S. nuclear testing” whose fragile structure is vulnerable to breaking from violent weather associated with climate change.

“Runit Dome represents a tragic confluence of nuclear testing and climate change,” Michael Gerrard, director of the Sabin Center for Climate Change Law at Columbia University, who visited the dome in 2010, told The Guardian.

Now locals, scientists and environmental activists fear that a storm surge, typhoon or other cataclysmic event brought on by climate change could tear the concrete mantel wide open, releasing its contents into the Pacific Ocean. …

In total, 67 nuclear and atmospheric bombs were detonated on Enewetak and Bikini between 1946 and 1958 – an explosive yield equivalent to 1.6 Hiroshima bombs detonated every day over the course of 12 years.

The detonations blanketed the islands with irradiated debris, including Plutonium-239, the fissile isotope used in nuclear warheads, which has a half-life of 24,000 years.

When the testing came to an end, the US Defence Nuclear Agency (DNA – later the DoE) carried out an eight-year cleanup, but Congress refused to fund a comprehensive decontamination programme to make the entire atoll fit for human settlement again.


Read more here http://www.theguardian.com/world/2015/jul/03/runit-dome-pacific-radioactive-waste

July 7, 2015

Hinkley Point nuclear subsidy challenged by Austria

Source: BBC

Austria has filed a legal complaint at the European Court of Justice against the use of government subsidies for the planned Hinkley Point C nuclear plant.

Austria's leader, Chancellor Werner Faymann, said the subsidies should support "new and modern technology" in the interest of all EU states.

But he argued this subsidy does not apply to atomic energy "in any way".

<snip>

The Austrians argued a deal by the UK government to guarantee the price of electricity from the nuclear plant breaches European rules on state aid.

<snip>

Read more: http://www.bbc.com/news/uk-england-somerset-33407569

July 4, 2015

The Father Of Iran's Nuclear Program Recalls How It All Began

http://www.rferl.org/content/father-of-iran-nuclear-program-recalls-how-it-began/27108228.html

The Father Of Iran's Nuclear Program Recalls How It All Began
By Golnaz Esfandiari
July 03, 2015

It was late in 1973 when Akbar Etemad got the call -- the shah wanted to discuss ways to launch a nuclear program that would cement Iran's place among the world's modern nations.

<snip>

"Right now we don't need a nuclear weapon because Iran is a major regional power," Etemad recalls the shah saying. But if in the next 10, 15, or 20 years the regional military balance changed, the shah added, "then we would have to see what needs to be done."

As a result, Etemad worked to ensure that if Iran ever decided to build a bomb, it would be able to do so.

<snip>

Asked whether Tehran's nuclear program was worth the pressure the country has faced, Etemad replies with a simple "No."

<snip>

July 4, 2015

Iran's nuclear program may have cost the country $500 billion or more

http://www.businessinsider.com/irans-nuclear-program-has-been-an-astronomical-waste-for-the-country-2015-6

Iran's nuclear program may have cost the country $500 billion or more
Armin Rosen
Jun. 30, 2015, 11:18 PM

The Iranian nuclear program has been astronomically costly for the Islamic Republic.

A 2013 Carnegie Endowment for International Peace report authored by Iran analyst Karim Sadjapour estimated that the total cost of construction, operation, research, and nuclear-related international sanctions totaled around $100 billion.

In a June 29th conference call, Sadjapour said that bill may really be as much as $500 billion.

The dollar cost belies other, less quantifiable repercussions of the nuclear program. For example, nuclear-related sanctions have cut Iran off from foreign markets, leading to a demoralizing long-term economic trough.

<snip>

July 3, 2015

A group of Nobel Laureates have signed a declaration calling for urgent action on climate change

Source: Quartz

In 1955, partly out of urgency and partly out of guilt, a group of 52 Nobel Laureates signed a declaration on Mainau Island in Germany calling for an end to the use of nuclear weapons. The work of some of these prizewinners—including that of Otto Hahn, who discovered nuclear fission—was used to build nuclear weapons. They were horrified their work was turned into technology that could kill billions.

Now, 60 years on, again out of a mix of urgency and guilt, a group of 36 Nobel prizewinners have signed a new Mainau Declaration (pdf) calling for urgent action on climate change. The document is open for other Nobel Laureates to join.

The discoveries of these signatories have mostly improved the quality of life of people around the world, but they now stand horrified at the prospect of what unchecked use of natural resources could do to the future.

<snip>

Here is the 2015 declaration in full:

<snip>

Read more: http://qz.com/444787/a-group-of-nobel-laureates-have-signed-a-declaration-calling-for-urgent-action-on-climate-change/

July 3, 2015

How the next US nuclear accident could happen - by Hugh Gusterson

http://thebulletin.org/how-next-us-nuclear-accident-could-

How the next US nuclear accident could happen
Hugh Gusterson
06/30/2015 - 22:10

You learn a lot about a society from the way its accidents happen.

Safety analysts have found that Korean plane crashes were facilitated by a culture in which junior pilots do not challenge senior pilots, even when keeping quiet may result in their own deaths. Respect for elders, highly valued in Korean culture, can be a danger.

Meanwhile Sonja Schmid, in an excellent book on the 1986 Chernobyl disaster published earlier this year, has connected that fateful nuclear accident to a wider Soviet culture that insisted its own reactors not mimic American ones, and in which designers of nuclear power plants were siloed in a separate organization from the operators, whom they treated as a lesser breed with little need to understand in detail how their plants worked.

And what of the United States?

We can learn a lot about the potential for safety failures at US nuclear plants from the July 29, 2012, incident in which three religious activists broke into the supposedly impregnable Y-12 facility at Oak Ridge, Tennessee, the Fort Knox of uranium. Once there, they spilled blood and spray painted “work for peace not war” on the walls of a building housing enough uranium to build thousands of nuclear weapons. They began hammering on the building with a sledgehammer, and waited half an hour to be arrested. If an 82-year-old nun with a heart condition and two confederates old enough to be AARP members could do this, imagine what a team of determined terrorists could do.

We have a detailed understanding of this incident thanks to energetic reporting by Frank Munger, Dan Zak, and, finally, a recent tour de force account in the New Yorker by Eric Schlosser, who has established himself as the premier reporter on nuclear accidents waiting to happen. Their cumulative reporting suggests that the Achilles’ heel of US nuclear safety culture lies in a fondness for automated security technologies, the delegation of government functions to private contractors, and a predilection for hollow facsimiles of effective audit procedures.

<snip>


July 2, 2015

Labor-force participation drops to lowest level since 1977

Source: Market Watch


When the labor-force participation rate was last this low, Han Solo and Chewy were on an intergalatic quest for jobs.


The last time there was such a small percentage of Americans in the work force, “Star Wars” was in the theaters and Reggie Jackson was breaking home-run records in the World Series.

The labor force participation rate declined by 0.3 percentage point in June to 62.6%, the lowest rate since October 1977.

What accounts for June’s downturn is likely to be the timing of school graduations — the seasonally adjusted participation rate of 16-to-19 year olds dropped sharply, to 36.7% from 37.4%. That’s even though the raw numbers showed, quite logically as some schools ended, a big upturn in participation to 43.4% from 36.7%.

<snip>

But the bigger story in participation, the drop from Clinton-era participation in the 67% range, is a combination of baby boomers hitting retirement (the bigger factor) and other people who have given up trying to get a job.

<snip>

Read more: http://www.marketwatch.com/story/labor-force-participation-drops-to-lowest-level-since-1977-2015-07-02

July 2, 2015

Russia's Military Satellite Delay Leaves Country Vulnerable To Nuclear Missile Attacks: Report

Source: International Business Times

Russia may be working on modernizing its strategic missile force by developing advanced nuclear missile systems, but the country is itself vulnerable to similar attacks after delaying the launch of a new satellite-based missile warning system by four months, local media reported Wednesday.

The launch of the military satellite system has been postponed until November, leaving Russia blind in the event of a potential nuclear missile attack, The Moscow Times reported. The country’s aging Soviet-era early warning satellites seriously malfunctioned last year when one of three units went offline, followed by the decommissioning of the remaining two satellites in January.

Russia has been relying on land-based radar systems to detect incoming missiles ever since the malfunction crippled its satellite-based missile warning system. However, according to experts, the radar systems are not as effective as satellites in warning about incoming missiles because they can only detect objects within a specific range, The Moscow Times reported.

<snip>

Russia’s Aerospace Defense Forces, the military unit that operates early warning satellites, was expected to launch the new military satellite system, dubbed “united space system,” also called EKS, in July. The new system, which will include 12 EKS satellites, closely integrates with ground-based early warning radars to provide extensive details on global satellite launches.

<snip>

Read more: http://www.ibtimes.com/russias-military-satellite-delay-leaves-country-vulnerable-nuclear-missile-attacks-1991565

Profile Information

Member since: Wed Nov 10, 2004, 12:55 AM
Number of posts: 27,509
Latest Discussions»bananas's Journal