Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Showing Original Post only (View all)In Scathing Editorial, Vermont Newspaper Begs Sanders Not To Run [View all]
https://talkingpointsmemo.com/news/scathing-editorial-vermont-newspaper-begs-sanders-not-to-runThe editorial board for the Barre Montpelier Times Argus, a daily newspaper in Vermont, wrote a scathing editorial imploring Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-VT) not to run for President in 2020.
The board makes the case on four grounds: that Sanders has chosen his own Presidential ambitions over the needs of Vermonters, that he will again fracture the Democratic party during the primaries, that his message is stale and better carried by others and that he responded poorly to the accusations of sexism in his 2016 campaign.
Taken togetherego, electoral math, a tired message and a prickly media darlingSanders is convincing himself that hes the person who can win the White House in 2020, the board writes. We are not convinced he should.
Read the full editorial here.
The board makes the case on four grounds: that Sanders has chosen his own Presidential ambitions over the needs of Vermonters, that he will again fracture the Democratic party during the primaries, that his message is stale and better carried by others and that he responded poorly to the accusations of sexism in his 2016 campaign.
Taken togetherego, electoral math, a tired message and a prickly media darlingSanders is convincing himself that hes the person who can win the White House in 2020, the board writes. We are not convinced he should.
Read the full editorial here.
Sid
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
223 replies, 10896 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (77)
ReplyReply to this post
223 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
He had a good advantage last time since Hillary was the only other top tier candidate
madville
Jan 2019
#3
Things will be very, very different this time around for the Senator. Vetting will be thorough. (nt)
ehrnst
Jan 2019
#10
DON'T RUN .... repeat *** Do** Not ** Run ** We do not need you. Remain a Strong Senator!
trueblue2007
Jan 2019
#130
Is there a limit in General Discussion as to the number of threads on a particular subject?
MrsCoffee
Jan 2019
#7
I guess if it bothers you, then it's "divisive" and shouldn't be posted more than once.
ehrnst
Jan 2019
#46
Actually, it's a traditional job of editorial boards of newspapers to make endorsements.
ehrnst
Jan 2019
#34
Goalpost moved yet again. So now you posit that editors should be gagged about talking about
ehrnst
Jan 2019
#61
That reminds me, let me know when we can stop dancing around the REAL fucking issue.
Eliot Rosewater
Jan 2019
#174
"Goalpost moved yet again..." And you're unable to see the irony in making that statement.
LanternWaste
Jan 2019
#87
Is an editorial saying that DT shouldn't run in 2020 "preventing Democracy" too?
ehrnst
Jan 2019
#72
Similar "logic" was used to argue that closed upcoming primaries will "disenfranchise" voters.
NurseJackie
Jan 2019
#119
It said a lot more than just that he can't win. The paper supports their Vermont readership.
George II
Jan 2019
#56
It took him over a month, during which he continued to fight against her nomination. In contrast,
LongtimeAZDem
Jan 2019
#82
Some people think the voters in the last primary and caucus states should be able to participate.
Gore1FL
Jan 2019
#43
So any editorial saying Trump shouldn't run is also "against" participation in primaries/caucuses
ehrnst
Jan 2019
#154
No I am saying that staying in the race during the primary/caucus season is OK.
Gore1FL
Jan 2019
#160
That wasn't a duplicate. I didn't thyink the first one posted. The content is largely unique.
Gore1FL
Jan 2019
#208
I suggested that Clinton and Sanders were right in 2008 and 2016 respectively.
Gore1FL
Jan 2019
#217
No I mean when a troll can't figure out the topic and harps for days on their misunderstanding.
Gore1FL
Jan 2019
#218
In my opinion Clinton and Sanders were correct when they stayed in their respective races. nt
Gore1FL
Jan 2019
#223
The voters in the last primary and caucus states "shouldn't be able to participate?" Really?
ehrnst
Jan 2019
#152
You are unhappy with what the points the editorial makes, so you declare it to be "wrong."
ehrnst
Jan 2019
#203
Do think that the newspaper editors should be gagged from critiquing their own Senator
ehrnst
Jan 2019
#55
The one obvious harm is that he'll split vote on the left, which might not be a bad thing during the
OnDoutside
Jan 2019
#23
The Times-Argus is the second largest newspaper by circulation in Vermont
TexasTowelie
Jan 2019
#107
You think that editors should be gagged from anything but positive comments about
ehrnst
Jan 2019
#68
If you are talking about pulp copies, I don't know if that's a reliable metric. Online subscriptions
ehrnst
Jan 2019
#102
If they really want to really blow up one figure here or one word there, I would argue
ehrnst
Jan 2019
#141
It's the #2 newspaper in paid circulation behind the Burlington Free Press.
TexasTowelie
Jan 2019
#111
So, do you have an answer to that? And what significance it has that you feel a need demand
ehrnst
Jan 2019
#155
I lived in Burlington for a year after college (UVM was one of my secondary choices) and
smirkymonkey
Jan 2019
#109
The Times Argus is a very left-leaning publication, glad to see them speaking out.
George II
Jan 2019
#40
Yeah, so left leaning they supported the republican for Governor in November.
Hassin Bin Sober
Jan 2019
#59
So the Burlington Free Press, the Barre-Montepelier Time-Argus, Seven Days, and Vermont Digger
TexasTowelie
Jan 2019
#123
You can find a paper to do a scathing editorial on a Presidential candidate in his own back yard.
JCanete
Jan 2019
#120
Nor did I say they shouldn't be, so why you'd focus on that in my post I have no idea. nt
JCanete
Jan 2019
#126
You're the one that complained about having to read the same article twice.
TexasTowelie
Jan 2019
#129
For my part, I'd get bored of the same article praising Bernie. If you want to be breathless about
JCanete
Jan 2019
#136
Because there's more information to be gleaned than the article itself silly. There's what posters
JCanete
Jan 2019
#142
Yet, you could have moved on without making a comment complaining about the same article being
TexasTowelie
Jan 2019
#143
again, hardly the thrust of my original post. But gravitate to what you will. nt
JCanete
Jan 2019
#171
I don't fear exposure of commentary like this Cha.Even if it were insightful and unimpeachable
JCanete
Jan 2019
#181
I love how casually people label Sanders as "abrasive" when the same said about Warren/Clinton...
MadDAsHell
Jan 2019
#182
okay. That is actually utterly ridiculous. How much ground did Sanders pick up
JCanete
Jan 2019
#200
Interestingly, many here are trying to dismiss this as a "tiny, nowhere" little rag.
ehrnst
Jan 2019
#214