Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: *THIS* is why Pelosi was the absolutely correct choice for speaker.... [View all]Roland99
(53,342 posts)1. Headline and snippet...
Nancy Pelosis Winning Strategy
She beat George W. Bush on Social Security privatization, and shell beat Trump on the wall.
Pelosis strategy resembles the one she employed to debilitate another Republican president: George W. Bush. Bush returned to Washington after his 2004 reelection victory determined to partially privatize Social Security. I earned capital in the campaign, political capital, he told the press, and I intend to spend it. Bushs plan contained two main elements. The first was convincing the public that there was a crisis. Social Security, he declared in his 2005 State of the Union address, is headed toward bankruptcy. The second was persuading Democrats to offer their own proposals for changing it.
As Matthew Yglesias pointed out not long ago, a fallacy underlay Bushs argument. Even if you believed Social Security was going bankrupt, diverting some of the tax money that funds it into private accounts wouldnt solve the problem. It would make the problem worse. To mask that glitch, Bush needed to lure Democrats into offering proposals that actually shored up Social Securitys financesby cutting benefits, raising taxes, or cutting other spendingbut were highly unpopular. Americans would presumably prefer Bushs cotton candy to the Democrats broccoli, and thus empower Bush to fulfill the decades-old conservative goal of ending Social Security as a program of social insurance.
Aiding Bushs effort was the fact that prominent Democrats had proposed tinkering with Social Security in the past. In his State of the Union address, Bush observed, During the 1990s, my predecessor, President Clinton, spoke of increasing the retirement age. Former [Democratic] Senator John Breaux suggested discouraging early collection of Social Security benefits. The late [Democratic] Senator Daniel Patrick Moynihan recommended changing the way benefits are calculated. Bill Clinton and Joe Lieberman had even toyed with private accounts.
But Pelosi, then House minority leader, wouldnt take the bait. She denied that Social Security was in crisis. And she refused to offer a plan for changing it. When a member of Congress asked when Democrats would offer their own proposals, she replied, Never. Is never good enough for you?
As Matthew Yglesias pointed out not long ago, a fallacy underlay Bushs argument. Even if you believed Social Security was going bankrupt, diverting some of the tax money that funds it into private accounts wouldnt solve the problem. It would make the problem worse. To mask that glitch, Bush needed to lure Democrats into offering proposals that actually shored up Social Securitys financesby cutting benefits, raising taxes, or cutting other spendingbut were highly unpopular. Americans would presumably prefer Bushs cotton candy to the Democrats broccoli, and thus empower Bush to fulfill the decades-old conservative goal of ending Social Security as a program of social insurance.
Aiding Bushs effort was the fact that prominent Democrats had proposed tinkering with Social Security in the past. In his State of the Union address, Bush observed, During the 1990s, my predecessor, President Clinton, spoke of increasing the retirement age. Former [Democratic] Senator John Breaux suggested discouraging early collection of Social Security benefits. The late [Democratic] Senator Daniel Patrick Moynihan recommended changing the way benefits are calculated. Bill Clinton and Joe Lieberman had even toyed with private accounts.
But Pelosi, then House minority leader, wouldnt take the bait. She denied that Social Security was in crisis. And she refused to offer a plan for changing it. When a member of Congress asked when Democrats would offer their own proposals, she replied, Never. Is never good enough for you?
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
58 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
*THIS* is why Pelosi was the absolutely correct choice for speaker.... [View all]
scheming daemons
Jan 2019
OP
No fucking fig leaf. The GOP has been doing this for nine years now. I am over it. Stand firm and
Demsrule86
Jan 2019
#11
I don't agree...it is a waste of time. It would take months so should be a nonstarter.
Demsrule86
Jan 2019
#14
Then we win. We have always said we'd talk if they open the government while we're talking. nt
SunSeeker
Jan 2019
#27
There is already a committee. We just refuse to be used as a photo op for Shitler.
SunSeeker
Jan 2019
#54
No this has to end. We give no fig leaf to the Russian scum bag traitor president...he needs to have
Demsrule86
Jan 2019
#26
We'll never look as stupid as we'd be if we accepted a stupid, stupid wall. It's a non-starter.
ancianita
Jan 2019
#37
Personally, I want an experienced pilot during a horrific storm, not a rookie who thinks that
ehrnst
Jan 2019
#22
The "fresh blood" should learn from the battle hardened experienced leader.
IronLionZion
Jan 2019
#9
Youth might bring us sensible gun laws and single payer healthcare eventually
IronLionZion
Jan 2019
#35
Great Atlantic piece. They correctly give her credit for saving SS under Bush. nt
SunSeeker
Jan 2019
#30