General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Wait, What? [View all]gab13by13
(21,491 posts)the main criticism of Garland came from the Arizona fraudit. The only action taken was a stern letter for Qanon Cyber Ninjas who are violating Title 52 - Voting and Elections - Subtitle I and II. In the stern letter was a warning for Cyber Ninjas not to go door to door intimidating voters urging them to sign affidavits regarding election irregularities. The Cyber Ninjas ignored that warning.
I'm pleased as punch that un-American election laws are being challenged in court. I am not a lawyer but I would bet anyone who wants to bet that these voting law suits won't be adjudicated until after the 2022 election, which still makes it critical to get S1 passed, to get the filibuster axed or reformed. There is no guarantee that these DOJ law suits will be won, especially since a former more liberal Supreme Court already gutted the civil rights act.
The Pa. AG has the right approach, he publicly stated that he would charge people who knowingly use untruthful "data" in passing voter suppression laws. Politicians who are passing these un-American voting laws need to be held accountable.
If none of the above works then an effort needs to be made to increase the size of the SC.
Challenging these laws is a must but more needs to be done.