Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

teach1st

(5,935 posts)
5. A problem with the report
Fri Mar 22, 2024, 10:32 PM
Mar 22

From the report, among the items that respondents had to determine as fact or opinion, item six:

6. The Earth is between 5,000 and 10,000 years old (statement of fact).

Explanation: Item 6 is a statement of fact that is factually incorrect. Only 26% of respondents answered this correctly. We suspect many of the errors may reflect thinking to the effect of “people who claim that are wrong, but they’re entitled to their opinion.” Such rationalizations potentially enable misinformation to survive by reclassifying factual error as opinion.


I missed that one. I have a hard time wrapping my head around a factually incorrect statement being a statement of fact. Current scientific consensus is that Earth is about 4.5 billion years old. Is that a statement of fact? If so, item six can't be factual. If it isn't, then item 6 isn't either. How can a statement of fact be factually incorrect?
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Americans struggle to tel...»Reply #5