Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Showing Original Post only (View all)

kpete

(72,056 posts)
Fri Aug 30, 2013, 12:36 PM Aug 2013

Daniel Ellsberg: 前bama Would Have Indicted Me & Sought A Life Sentence For Me" [View all]

Daniel Ellsberg: ‘Obama Would Have Indicted Me’

But we come back to Obama. I think Obama’s interpretation is no, these are criminals… and he has decided to do what no previous president did ... which is to say prosecuted multiple whistle-blowers under the Espionage Act. He has brought seven indictments. ... Before him there were three presidents who each brought one … It’s an unprecedented campaign against whistle-blowing. And [Army Judge Denise Lind] is in a chain of command where she heard her commander in chief say [Manning] was guilty before he was even on trial. But I think he believes that, definitely. I have no question at all that Obama would not only have indicted me for the Pentagon Papers now ... even if it was before him, and I have no doubt that he would have sought a life sentence for me and believed I deserved it.


Transcript Here:
http://www.truthdig.com/report/item/daniel_ellsberg_whistle-blowers_are_good_for_democracy_20130829/
Listen Here:
http://www.truthdig.com/avbooth/item/daniel_ellsberg_obama_would_have_indicted_me_20130829/?ln
80 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
live, or life? ChairmanAgnostic Aug 2013 #1
ChairmanAgnostic kpete Aug 2013 #2
always, KP, always. ChairmanAgnostic Aug 2013 #5
I do not recall Ellsberg as an individual who used his words to merely flame a situation. Jefferson23 Aug 2013 #3
+1 woo me with science Aug 2013 #6
Me too......nt Enthusiast Aug 2013 #21
great man of history but maybe losing the plot now. Assange-praise was the first sign. nt uhnope Aug 2013 #54
a great man and even greater as he has recognised Assange's contribution Swagman Aug 2013 #55
That's like right wing not allowing the term "racist". "Egotist" in dictionary has Assange's photo. uhnope Aug 2013 #70
I do believe his perspective is worth considering, you're certainly free to disagree. n/t Jefferson23 Aug 2013 #61
This is how sick the war on journalists and whistleblowers has gotten. woo me with science Aug 2013 #4
by their claims shall ye know them: in 2006-10 They said the left was going to purge the Dems MisterP Aug 2013 #7
Slick and devious. woo me with science Aug 2013 #8
well, more like "blatantly telegraphing and so ham-fisted as to cause confusion" MisterP Aug 2013 #10
Lord Black renounced his Canadian citizenship arikara Aug 2013 #62
+100 nt LiberalEsto Aug 2013 #34
Ellsberg, you didn't steal 58,000 documents without reading them pnwmom Aug 2013 #9
Snowden revealed an UNCONSTITUTIONAL SURVEILLANCE STATE. woo me with science Aug 2013 #11
If that was what he cared about, why did he divert attention pnwmom Aug 2013 #12
No, you're the one trying to fabricate national security dangers. woo me with science Aug 2013 #18
You're not keeping up. The Washington Post says they were given pnwmom Aug 2013 #19
And he didn't pass on documents to risk anyone's lives. woo me with science Aug 2013 #25
Yes, he did pass on documents that could risk lives, as he has just acknowledged. pnwmom Aug 2013 #29
Love this post hueymahl Aug 2013 #58
''Snowden is nothing like you, Ellsberg.'' DeSwiss Aug 2013 #13
Ellsberg is fixated on the whistle-blowing aspect that they shared. pnwmom Aug 2013 #14
What they share is a love for freedom. DeSwiss Aug 2013 #17
The very first thing Snowden released was marked Top Secret jmowreader Aug 2013 #22
Then Ellberg clearly has been misinformed. n/t pnwmom Aug 2013 #24
Or none of them are who we believe them to be jmowreader Aug 2013 #42
The question I ask myself is, "do I trust the Republican run spy agencies, run by Clapper, rhett o rick Aug 2013 #48
Ummm, so what? TiberiusB Aug 2013 #68
Did Mr Ellsberg told you he was misinformed but forgot to tell everyone else? idwiyo Aug 2013 #44
But how do you feel about the NSA spying on us? Dustlawyer Aug 2013 #65
You seem to have a deep interest in protecting UK spying in the ME. former9thward Aug 2013 #66
Apparently rationalization is the key to your happiness. Why dont you rhett o rick Aug 2013 #39
So does Amnesty International (see A.I. petition at https://petitions.whitehouse.gov) proverbialwisdom Aug 2013 #46
it's always fun to watch someone admonish one of the leading subject matter experts on this issue.. frylock Aug 2013 #53
K & R ~ nt 99th_Monkey Aug 2013 #15
Kicked and recommended. Uncle Joe Aug 2013 #16
as always kpete Aug 2013 #35
Did Ellsberg impersonate someone with higher security clearance to steal documents? KittyWampus Aug 2013 #20
No and he didnt date a pole dancer, what's your point? He supports Pfc Manning rhett o rick Aug 2013 #40
I'm Sure Dan Cares About Your Opinion HangOnKids Aug 2013 #41
no but the end result is the same...a revealtion that we are spied upon Swagman Aug 2013 #56
"Truthdig Radio airs Thursdays at 4 p.m. Pacific time on 90.7 KPFK in Los Angeles." bananas Aug 2013 #23
K & R !!! WillyT Aug 2013 #26
Again, just a lot of bitching here, damned if Obama does his job and damned if he does not, WTH. Thinkingabout Aug 2013 #27
"People commits crimes and they need to face the time." Vanje Aug 2013 #30
Don't forget financial crimes that bring the entire world economy QC Aug 2013 #31
I did not excuse any of the crimes. When the Glass-Stegall Act like as repealed, it allowed Thinkingabout Aug 2013 #37
I guess the repeal of Glass-Stegall allowed war crimes as well. EOTE Aug 2013 #60
Are you familiar with the Glass-Stegall Act? The post to which I responded was a statement about Thinkingabout Aug 2013 #74
+1000000 How about implementing a surveillance state woo me with science Aug 2013 #32
What part of the Constitution are you referring? Thinkingabout Aug 2013 #38
I'm going to take a wild-assed guess here Vanje Aug 2013 #71
So if warrants are issued this would be in compliance with the Fourth Amendment. The warrants was Thinkingabout Aug 2013 #72
Warrants issued by a hand-picked secret court, based on secret laws Vanje Aug 2013 #79
Well, at least you are agreeing warrants are being issued. As far as which court they are being Thinkingabout Aug 2013 #80
For some reason, a large number of folks have swallowed the NSA's views and believe Dustlawyer Aug 2013 #64
some people would rather have kings fascisthunter Aug 2013 #50
Suuuuure... TiberiusB Aug 2013 #67
I love Daniel Ellsberg gopiscrap Aug 2013 #28
He was indicted and convicted Peregrine Aug 2013 #33
And he's rightly revered for it. Waiting For Everyman Aug 2013 #52
Not a doubt. bvar22 Aug 2013 #36
K&R idwiyo Aug 2013 #43
K&R idwiyo Aug 2013 #45
k&r thanks for posting. nm rhett o rick Aug 2013 #47
undoubtably true fascisthunter Aug 2013 #49
Yes he would. Autumn Aug 2013 #51
the quislings still cannot silence good and honest men even as they rabbit Swagman Aug 2013 #57
FACT. Safetykitten Aug 2013 #59
Ellsberg was tried on espionage, theft and other charges totalling 115 years FarCenter Aug 2013 #63
Uh oh. We already found out Ellsburg is a "dick head" from one proud poster DisgustipatedinCA Aug 2013 #69
Any President's DOJ would have indicted him treestar Aug 2013 #73
Obama has prosecuted more people under the Espionage act than all previous presidents combined davidn3600 Aug 2013 #75
Prosecutions are undertaken where there is enough evidence for an indictment treestar Aug 2013 #76
There was nothing else Snowden could have done to reveal what was going on davidn3600 Aug 2013 #77
Mr Ellsberg is jabbering meaningless nonsense, comparing entirely different events, struggle4progress Aug 2013 #78
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Daniel Ellsberg: 前bama W...