General Discussion

Nye Bevan

(25,406 posts) Tue Sep 3, 2013, 12:23 PM Sep 2013

Should France have gotten involved in the US Revolutionary War? [View all]

Taxation without representation hardly equates to the use of WMDs. And the French mainland was not threatened by the conflict. Obviously Benjamin Franklin was very successful in persuading France to intervene, but was it right for them to do so?

6 votes, 1 pass \| Time left: Unlimited
	Yes, it was right for France to intervene militarily in the US Revolutionary War.
	4 (67%)
	No, France should have stayed out of the conflict.
	2 (33%)
	1 DU member did not wish to select any of the options provided.
Show usernames Disclaimer: This is an Internet poll

42 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Should France have gotten involved in the US Revolutionary War? [View all] Nye Bevan Sep 2013 OP

Certainly not from the French people's point of view. See 1789 for what happened next. Tierra_y_Libertad Sep 2013 #1

Assisting the Americans ran up French debt and they lost their main fleet FarCenter Sep 2013 #8

They didn't do it for us. They did it for France. Marr Sep 2013 #2

No shit, how many bites at the apple are these folks going to take to sell their war? TheKentuckian Sep 2013 #4

It's like stepping back in time to 2003. Marr Sep 2013 #7

We should not have fought the Crown sarisataka Sep 2013 #3

The Revolutionary War was largely a proxy war between England and France. Xithras Sep 2013 #5

+1 One_Life_To_Give Sep 2013 #21

Yup, and at least 1 point France tried to sell us out. zipplewrath Sep 2013 #32

France got in seeking to gain opportunity ... Historic NY Sep 2013 #6

Exactly. BlueMTexpat Sep 2013 #10

It was a low-cost way to damage Britain cthulu2016 Sep 2013 #9

yep dembotoz Sep 2013 #12

It was a bad move for the French king. JVS Sep 2013 #11

They actually had the gall to put troops on the ground to aid the insurgents! karynnj Sep 2013 #13

Were the Americans religious zealots that had recently attacked France? LondonReign2 Sep 2013 #16

I wasn't attempting an analogy. karynnj Sep 2013 #18

Are you suggesting we put troops in Syria then? LondonReign2 Sep 2013 #19

Isn't Britain not going to war during our civil war a better analogy? hootinholler Sep 2013 #14

Yep and I was going to add the burning of Atlanta would be even more analogous. n/t Nuclear Unicorn Sep 2013 #29

It was in their strategic interest to do so LittleBlue Sep 2013 #15

Yes shenmue Sep 2013 #17

Which ones zipplewrath Sep 2013 #33

+infinity (nt) LostOne4Ever Sep 2013 #35

Sorrow for one denies sorrow for the other? LanternWaste Sep 2013 #39

We haven't killed any... yet zipplewrath Sep 2013 #42

France wanted to bloody Britain's nose. NuclearDem Sep 2013 #20

France did not go in out of sympathy for our brave patriots. KamaAina Sep 2013 #22

Lame. whatchamacallit Sep 2013 #23

Actually, I have found several of the posts in this thread very informative. Nye Bevan Sep 2013 #26

Well I'm glad whatchamacallit Sep 2013 #31

Les pommes et les oranges marmar Sep 2013 #24

France engaged in what was, essentially, a century-long war against Britain... malthaussen Sep 2013 #25

The French wanted to help the South during the Civil War. Manifestor_of_Light Sep 2013 #27

I don't know - but consider the possibilities - hedgehog Sep 2013 #28

The US today would probably resemble Canada. Nye Bevan Sep 2013 #30

Effect on the Monarch zipplewrath Sep 2013 #34

The West Coast may well have been split between Mexico hedgehog Sep 2013 #36

yes. we had common enemies. GalaxyHunter Sep 2013 #37

a much stronger analogous thread, e.g., the Ottoman War of Succession 1509-12 LanternWaste Sep 2013 #38

Helping us helped push them into bankruptcy and helped hasten their own Revolutionary war. liberal_at_heart Sep 2013 #40

Yes, I am willing to bankrupt the US treasury to assist Syria. Dr Fate Sep 2013 #41