Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Paying for high deductables, low benefits, and huge copays is not "insurance". [View all]meaculpa2011
(918 posts)35. Exactly right.
What we had before, what we have now and what we will continue to have in the future is a third-party payment system.
It is not insurance by any tortured definition anyone can conjure.
It's a giveaway to the insurance companies that sets in stone all of the worst aspects of the previous system, keeps profits high and costs escalating.
Single provider is the only logical and viable answer.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
55 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Paying for high deductables, low benefits, and huge copays is not "insurance". [View all]
Stinky The Clown
Nov 2013
OP
You are not too familiar with the games the hospital accounting people play.
truedelphi
Nov 2013
#22
It sounded like you were disappointed, but that was clearly my interpretation.
WowSeriously
Nov 2013
#18
Come January we'll shift to the "You can keep your doctor" part of the equation.
cherokeeprogressive
Nov 2013
#36
Krugman says the ACA is even more wildly successful than its most ardent advocates expected
Fumesucker
Nov 2013
#27