Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Showing Original Post only (View all)LOL !!! - Talk About WHO Is Under The Bus... Looks Like It's The NSA Now !!! [View all]
Judge Questions Legality of N.S.A. Phone RecordsBy CHARLIE SAVAGE - NYT
Published: December 16, 2013
An advertisement thanking former National Security Agency contractor Edward J. Snowden appears on the side of a bus in downtown Washington, D.C.
<snip>
WASHINGTON A federal district judge ruled on Monday that the National Security Agency program that is systematically keeping records of all Americans phone calls most likely violates the Constitution, describing its technology as almost Orwellian and suggesting that James Madison would be aghast to learn that the government was encroaching on liberty in such a way.
Judge Richard J. Leon of the District of Columbia ordered the government to stop collecting data on the personal calls of the two plaintiffs in the case and to destroy the records of their calling history. But the judge, appointed to the bench in 2002 by President George W. Bush, stayed his injunction in light of the significant national security interests at stake in this case and the novelty of the constitutional issues, allowing the government time to appeal it, a matter that he said could take at least six months. The case is the first in which a federal judge who is not on the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court, which authorized the once-secret program, has examined the bulk data collection on behalf of someone who is not a criminal defendant.
The Justice Department has said that 15 separate judges on the surveillance court have held on 35 occasions that the calling data program is legal. It also marks the first successful legal challenge brought against the program since it was revealed in June after leaks by the former N.S.A. contractor Edward J. Snowden.
I cannot imagine a more indiscriminate and arbitrary invasion than this systematic and high-tech collection and retention of personal data on virtually every single citizen for purposes of querying and analyzing it without prior judicial approval, Judge Leon wrote in a 68-page ruling. Surely, such a program infringes on that degree of privacy that the founders enshrined in the Fourth Amendment, which prohibits unreasonable searches and seizures.
Andrew Ames, a Justice Department spokesman, said government lawyers were studying the decision, but he added: We believe the program is constitutional as previous judges have found.
In a statement from Moscow, where he has obtained temporary asylum, Mr. Snowden praised the ruling.
I acted on my belief that the N.S.A.s mass surveillance programs would not withstand a constitutional challenge, and that the American public deserved a chance to see these issues determined by open courts, Mr. Snowden said in his statement. It was distributed by the journalist Glenn Greenwald, who received leaked documents from Mr. Snowden and who wrote the first article about the bulk data collection. Today, a secret program authorized by a secret court was, when exposed to the light of day, found to violate Americans rights, the statement said. It is the first of many.
The case was brought by...
<snip>
More: http://www.nytimes.com/2013/12/17/us/politics/federal-judge-rules-against-nsa-phone-data-program.html
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
18 replies, 3341 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (48)
ReplyReply to this post
18 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies