Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: There is nothing that causes outrage among men like female sexual autonomy. [View all]lumberjack_jeff
(33,224 posts)123. Your argument depends upon him self identifying as a misognynist. Right? Surely you can see that?
Last edited Wed Dec 18, 2013, 10:29 PM - Edit history (1)
"Smoking is addictive. I know because I'm addicted."
is like
"A desire for jealous control of all women causes misogyny. I know because ____________"
You would have me accept "...all y'all other men are misogynists!" as an answer.
I'm in a position to know that it's false and he is therefore wrong.
I'm sorry that I'm not a sensitive enough guy. C'est la vie.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
163 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
There is nothing that causes outrage among men like female sexual autonomy. [View all]
Recursion
Dec 2013
OP
It may be, on some level. Rooted in a time when masturbation was considered shameful.
nomorenomore08
Dec 2013
#135
I think that's the root of it: we have "excused male aggression...for millenia, while
Squinch
Dec 2013
#90
What you are feeling is jealousy, and you're not uniquely vulnerable to it because you are a man. nt
lumberjack_jeff
Dec 2013
#12
Why do you guys take this so personally? Like it applies equally to *all* men?
nomorenomore08
Dec 2013
#107
When has men's sexual agency ever been restricted to the same degree as women's?
nomorenomore08
Dec 2013
#119
Organized religion was primative(unenlightened) man's means of controlling society.
Dawson Leery
Dec 2013
#13
But are observations of large-scale social phenomena necessarily a "broad brush"?
nomorenomore08
Dec 2013
#109
No. But I didn't take the OP as a statement on all men, universally. Just a general observation.
nomorenomore08
Dec 2013
#153
well, I think for men to be anti-choice, it is really about the question of women being
CTyankee
Dec 2013
#89
Very true. Stomping down and controlling women is at the very heart of the patriarchal monotheisms.
Arugula Latte
Dec 2013
#20
What if a woman uses her sexual autonomy to choose to become a porn actress?
redgreenandblue
Dec 2013
#25
Most anti-porn activists are right-wing men. I think they would be the "outraged" ones.
nomorenomore08
Dec 2013
#113
So, I take it you realized that your original post, before all your edits, the one that
Squinch
Dec 2013
#32
It should no more be hidden than an OP that says all "men/women/white people/AA's/heteros/"....
NoOneMan
Dec 2013
#42
Yes, broadbrush stereotypes against an entire gender tend to create reactions that miss the point
NoOneMan
Dec 2013
#39
Yes, but its not reason to hate an entire group of people due to their gender, race, religion, etc.
NoOneMan
Dec 2013
#85
I would say 'some men', rather than 'men', which seems overly-inclusive.
AtheistCrusader
Dec 2013
#30
Oh, so now ignorant stereotypical broadbrushes just hurt our poor wittle feelings
NoOneMan
Dec 2013
#52
If you want to discuss the violence against women, do you blame ALL men first?
NoOneMan
Dec 2013
#60
I didn't miss the point. Rather, I didn't get to it. I stopped at the stereotype.
NoOneMan
Dec 2013
#69
Yeah, because everybody knows there's no basis whatsoever for women to be distrustful of men.
nomorenomore08
Dec 2013
#116
Well said. And it is an interesting area for discussion. But, of course, that won't happen.
Squinch
Dec 2013
#34
The secondary flaw is the presumption that women don't feel the same thing.
lumberjack_jeff
Dec 2013
#65
Why is his generalization based on a personal anecdote any more valid...
lumberjack_jeff
Dec 2013
#84
If you want to start a conversation, you don't accuse others of something right off the bat
The2ndWheel
Dec 2013
#106
What if it's something they're actually *doing*? If only subconsciously?
nomorenomore08
Dec 2013
#124
Agreed. Some will more or less willingly acquiesce to change, others will have to be dragged
nomorenomore08
Dec 2013
#139
Your argument depends upon him self identifying as a misognynist. Right? Surely you can see that?
lumberjack_jeff
Dec 2013
#123
This thread goes beyond someone recognizing their own person actions or instincts
NoOneMan
Dec 2013
#88
I don't know that I'd go so far as to call it "disturbing." Sexual jealousy/frustration is a common-
nomorenomore08
Dec 2013
#125
Really, the issue is what a culture does with it. Every culture uses it's rage cudgel
Squinch
Dec 2013
#149
I don't find it inappropriate either. And I've never physically harmed anyone but I've certainly
nomorenomore08
Dec 2013
#154
Do you think there is any difference between men in general and women in general
Squinch
Dec 2013
#150
If you go back 10,000 years, you'll find that religions worshiped the female.
Egalitarian Thug
Dec 2013
#99
"It has angered me when women wanted to be sexually involved with men other than me"
Kaleva
Dec 2013
#112
Broadbrush attacks calling out an entire gender for collective guilt will do that.
Throd
Dec 2013
#134