Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

FBaggins

(26,946 posts)

18. 2011?

Reply to RobertEarl (Reply #15)

Thu Feb 6, 2014, 06:10 PM

Feb 2014

How is that news? That was publicaly reported back when it happened. It doesn't tell us that the the plume in the Pacific has arrived.

The debate is whether their current monitoring has shows that the radioactive elements carried by sea water have arrived on the coast yet.

They haven't.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

22 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Scientists in mad scramble to establish ocean WQ monitoring [View all] RobertEarl Feb 2014 OP

That is so wonderful! ananda Feb 2014 #1

So I followed your link that is linked to the Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution snooper2 Feb 2014 #2

Apparently not as radioactive as some are claiming. longship Feb 2014 #3

You making things up yet again RE? FBaggins Feb 2014 #4

Oh, it's there RobertEarl Feb 2014 #11

A simple "yes... I'm making it up" would do FBaggins Feb 2014 #12

Yes it is RobertEarl Feb 2014 #13

I have... in fact I posted it already FBaggins Feb 2014 #14

Oh, you need help? RobertEarl Feb 2014 #15

2011? FBaggins Feb 2014 #18

That's what I wrote earlier RobertEarl Feb 2014 #20

... SidDithers Feb 2014 #5

Ocean water off La Jolla coast being monitored (and not) for Fukushima radiation Octafish Feb 2014 #6

Indeed RobertEarl Feb 2014 #7

If researchers can't get funding for Fukushima, it must mean there's nothing to worry about. Octafish Feb 2014 #8

No one needs to make it seem worse than it is RobertEarl Feb 2014 #10

Check out this chili recipe zappaman Feb 2014 #9

I think the SOP of GD should be updated to include the phrase "No (deliberate) misinformation". Vashta Nerada Feb 2014 #16

You? Again? RobertEarl Feb 2014 #17

Abso-fucking-lutely... SidDithers Feb 2014 #21

That's not true RobertEarl Feb 2014 #22

From the site RobertEarl Feb 2014 #19