Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

freshwest

(53,661 posts)
55. Title of thread refers to Obama's actions, not Bush. Held for political effect. Indicted now for
Mon Apr 9, 2012, 11:52 AM
Apr 2012

Doing a Scooter Libby, whom Bush got off the hook as it served his intentions to out an CIA agent during the Bush administration, since her husband was arguing against the yellow cake canard to start the Iraq War.

CIA agents and civil servants are not above doing things for partisan politics.

The Republicans don't hold what Scooter did against them, nor anything else that Bush did. All the refuse he left that the Obama administration has been cleaning up, has magically left his balance sheet and transferred to the Democrats. There is a convenient memory lapse with conspiracy theorists who forget the GOP media and their followers of the firestorm about Gitmo, which Obama tried to close. They're complaining about these prosecutions, too:

http://lonelyconservative.com/2011/05/republicans-call-on-obama-admin-to-halt-investigation-of-cia-operatives/

There has never been so embattled a president since FDR, not even Carter or JFK faced this amount of opposition. And for the exact same reasons. FDR failed at many things in his first two terms, but all that is remembered are his successes, which only occurred after battles with the Supreme Court and all other forces the business class threw at him, including a coup by Prescott Bush and pals.

And FDR did not have a public as dumbed down and divided as Americans are now, watching the media spin machine that has with Koch brothers money from CT to mainstream, and the spawn of the rest of FDR's enemies, playing both sides against him. Back then one could speak of anything about public works or working together (socialism) and not get run out of town to the curses of the ignorant poor white voter, like in 2010.

As far as the spawn of Prescott, Bush, Sr., CIA director and friend to Nixon and Reagan, Republicans don't care, they didn't care when he did it, and they don't care now. Nothing he did, including TARP, the invasion of Iraq under false pretenses, water boarding and stealing billions, do they hold against them. And the aftermath of all of that is what we're living with now.

That's not in the news, yet what the GOP doesn't want to happen is in the news. Something is rotten.

Now that this man's actions have come under fire for law enforcement under the Obama administration for committing a Scooter Libby, some find fault with Obama. Complaints of partisanship are frequently used by the GOP, which is the most partisan group there is, whereas if a Democrat trys to work work with the GOP which doesn't play fair, they're bad, also. Can't win.

I want protections for those who are whistle blowing, always have. The merits of what this man did, are not being argued here, whether he outed someone in the sacred class of 'intelligence operatives' of which he a part of, but only that the Obama administration is following the law. He didn't write this law, and the DOJ is enforcing it.

The Holder DOJ, which people love to accuse of doing nothing, but has quietly been trying to rein much the Republicans have done, is accused of prosecuting the wrong things. The same people who whined about Bush not policing his own administration did so to a deaf audience, but now find it special that Obama is following the laws that Bush refused to follow. The DOJ is not just going after people that make the government look bad, as is being claimed here.

Protections for whistle blowers was eliminated during the Bush administration and I saw that happening up close and personal and people's lives being hurt. Those laws have eviscerated the standards, and Obama had nothing to do with doing it. Part of following the law involves arresting those who break it.

This suddenly heroic figure got in trouble for something he'd done during the Bush administration. People who fancy themselves born-again freedom fighters against the Obama administration won't address the fact that indictments are being handed down on the fallout of that mess on a daily basis.

http://www.justice.gov/

This man just got the sympathy of a group because he outed what Bush did. Not when it would have stopped anything. No, he held on that, and likely other things to keep his job.

I've known heroes in my life who have been savaged from doing government and corporate whistle blowing because they wanted to save lives. They didn't hold onto information until it was dead, dried up and useless like this guy, who held onto it for almost a decade. When Bush changed the laws, states rewrote their laws to match them and whistle blowers didn't win in court.

Truth will get out, justice will happen. We have a government that is involved in thousands of things that I despise and loathe. Whether it will ever go back to the Carter administration or Kennedy administration level of openness, which was alway tainted by the MIC, I can't say.

The idea that this guy is somehow special, smacks of idolatry. It reminds me of Oliver North who has been applauded for obstructing and lying to the Congress trying to get to the truth of Iran Contra. The folks who are willing to worship this man, accuse those who won't join in, of not believing in truth or justice. They say they are Democrats, when the GOP did the same.

It's very popular to attack this President on anything and everything, including things he didn't do. It's running with the pack of dogs set loose by media on any given day, both mainstream and conspiracy, but the effect is the same on those trying to get anything done, demoralization and moving to the right.

Anyone who is disturbed by modern governance is not happy at what the title charges, not because it's about Obama, is in their right mind to my point of view. This is not about one man who holds the office of POTUS, but a machine in place since WW2.

Some of us encouraged at the things Obama has done that are saving lives, have noticed that those who are running with that pack, never, ever find that Obama has done anything progressive because they are incapable of rejoicing at the smallest thing.

It would force them to leave their cynicism and media induced righteousness behind and dip into the chaos that we are facing. After a while, it becomes obvious that those who are sitting in judgment of those trying to get a messy job done, are not getting anything done, either, and I can't help but wonder why.

I won't bother to reason with anyone who's on a roll and I won't stand in the way. Carry on. n/t

Why do you think his admin is doing this? I would really love to know. nt Mojorabbit Apr 2012 #1
If we knew all of the dirty "war" secrets we'd be inclined to oppose military adventures abroad. Better Believe It Apr 2012 #5
Because they leaked classified information jeff47 Apr 2012 #6
They classify millions of documents that have nothing to do with the security of the nation. Better Believe It Apr 2012 #19
Go check the part between the parenthesis. jeff47 Apr 2012 #24
No, it's not hard to classify documents. fasttense Apr 2012 #36
You don't get to make up the reason jeff47 Apr 2012 #118
jeff47 dotymed Apr 2012 #42
You're giving a perfect example of "whistleblowers" who are wrong about what they're leaking. jeff47 Apr 2012 #113
Obviously you did not watch the video. dotymed Apr 2012 #202
Obviously, you didn't either. jeff47 Apr 2012 #206
How did I know who replied to my true post? dotymed Apr 2012 #222
Running around with an assault rifle in a war zone isn't dangerous? jeff47 Apr 2012 #223
Your argument assumes Plucketeer Apr 2012 #48
No, it doesn't. We're talking about a situation where a whistleblower wants to leak. (nt) jeff47 Apr 2012 #116
In your humble opinion...... cliffordu Apr 2012 #29
But we cannot tolerate such injustice and evil...EVER! CoffeeCat Apr 2012 #26
I don't think that information about possible crimes by members of our government JDPriestly Apr 2012 #32
well said. robinlynne Apr 2012 #84
Unfortunately, Torture was ruled legal. jeff47 Apr 2012 #119
It was? JonLP24 Apr 2012 #142
It became legal when it was declared "enhanced interrigaton techniques" jeff47 Apr 2012 #200
Here JonLP24 Apr 2012 #213
What people think the law should say isn't what the law says. jeff47 Apr 2012 #214
I posted the law JonLP24 Apr 2012 #215
Do you read your own links? jeff47 Apr 2012 #217
It is saying the rules of the Geneva Convention(Specifically Article 3) JonLP24 Apr 2012 #220
Torture isn't illegal? JDPriestly Apr 2012 #197
When "Enhanced interrogation techniques" were approved, and no successful challenge has been brought jeff47 Apr 2012 #201
That does not make them legal under international law. JDPriestly Apr 2012 #207
Yes, but international law is irrelevant in regards to the espionage act jeff47 Apr 2012 #218
Bullshit. Every word. saras Apr 2012 #35
No, you just hear about the whistleblowers jeff47 Apr 2012 #120
Drake didn't release classified information. Vattel Apr 2012 #56
Unfortunately, "enhanced interrogation" was rule legal, and nobody's successfully challenged that. jeff47 Apr 2012 #122
It was clearly criminal prior to the amendments made to the war crimes act. Vattel Apr 2012 #140
How was torture ruled legal? Are we still part of the civilized world which signed sabrina 1 Apr 2012 #162
"whistleblower"...such a cute metaphor didact Apr 2012 #69
so when international crimes are committed, one should be quiet and "obey the law"? robinlynne Apr 2012 #83
If one doesn't want to be prosecuted, yes. jeff47 Apr 2012 #123
Problem with the Espionage Act FightForChange Apr 2012 #93
Why do you think he stopped anything? jeff47 Apr 2012 #125
Too bad pardoning people doesn't poll better, eh? nt sudopod Apr 2012 #184
If this case is similar to the Bush Admin's case against Tom Drake, truedelphi Apr 2012 #107
But prosecuting whistleblowers under the Espionage IS unprecedented ... markpkessinger Apr 2012 #147
Bologna quakerboy Apr 2012 #216
When we pretend selective enforcement is OK jeff47 Apr 2012 #219
Don't need to pretend it exists quakerboy Apr 2012 #221
I think for two reasons. 1. They leaked classified information. And 2., the MIC RKP5637 Apr 2012 #12
Post removed Post removed Apr 2012 #15
They have no choice pscot Apr 2012 #18
To cover the butts of the gwb admin's war crimes. Dont call me Shirley Apr 2012 #106
Keep trying...nt SidDithers Apr 2012 #2
Keep spamming n/t brentspeak Apr 2012 #8
How do Canadians feel about the US torturning people? DisgustipatedinCA Apr 2012 #112
Here ProSense Apr 2012 #3
scooter libby? leftyohiolib Apr 2012 #4
Yeah, ProSense Apr 2012 #7
It would have been great if he'd cut loose with this in 2004. freshwest Apr 2012 #16
It served the GOP by releasing the information on 2007 how? TheKentuckian Apr 2012 #41
Are you saying ProSense Apr 2012 #46
Fear of retribution, perhaps? nt sudopod Apr 2012 #185
Title of thread refers to Obama's actions, not Bush. Held for political effect. Indicted now for freshwest Apr 2012 #55
Well said..... NYC_SKP Apr 2012 #132
But no one was indicted for outing Valerie Plame? Why not? JDPriestly Apr 2012 #33
The latter. jeff47 Apr 2012 #126
Where do you see something about being indicted for outing a CIA agent? JDPriestly Apr 2012 #34
What I see ProSense Apr 2012 #50
Maybe he couldn't find the courage, or maybe no one was willing to listen JDPriestly Apr 2012 #198
War criminals walk but whistleblowers stand trial?! Pretty fucked up. polichick Apr 2012 #9
10-4 marshall gaines Apr 2012 #57
President Obama is trying cases now?! FarLeftFist Apr 2012 #10
Naw, he's much too busy getting the Patriot Act repealed... think Apr 2012 #11
President Obama can direct the DOJ to not prosecute whistleblowers .... unless he's a weak and Better Believe It Apr 2012 #43
So you want this President to ask the DOJ to not do their job BklnDem75 Apr 2012 #51
I want the Obama administration to not charge whistleblowers with espionage! Better Believe It Apr 2012 #61
No, not at all. randome Apr 2012 #65
Are you the Amazing Kreskin? You know that is what he wants? Really? How do you explain Dragonfli Apr 2012 #76
Link? Bobbie Jo Apr 2012 #127
That's how I remember it, Dragonfli. All of a sudden we're not supposed to care sabrina 1 Apr 2012 #160
Well said... SidDithers Apr 2012 #103
So you can use english, just in a very limited way it would appear. At least it's a start. Dragonfli Apr 2012 #104
So do you favor charging whistleblowers with espionage? Please try to stay on topic. Thanks. Better Believe It Apr 2012 #108
So you DO want Obama to act like Bush BklnDem75 Apr 2012 #68
He seems to be pretty good at ignoring torture and the prosecution of torturers. Tierra_y_Libertad Apr 2012 #80
Probably because it's not his job BklnDem75 Apr 2012 #88
All Presidents give direction to the DOJ. You didn't know that? Better Believe It Apr 2012 #111
That direction isn't to ignore lawbreakers BklnDem75 Apr 2012 #130
So you think Obama should concentrate DOJ resources on medical pot dispensaries and whistleblowers. Better Believe It Apr 2012 #134
Obama should let Holder do his job, like he's been appointed to do BklnDem75 Apr 2012 #168
I don't want him to and I really wish he wouldn't when it comes to civil liberties. Better Believe It Apr 2012 #109
Espionage isn't a civil liberty BklnDem75 Apr 2012 #131
But, when done by the CIA murdererers and torturers, it's protected by our government. Tierra_y_Libertad Apr 2012 #151
Keep trying...nt SidDithers Apr 2012 #102
K & R AzDar Apr 2012 #13
Is waterboarding classified intormation? nt snappyturtle Apr 2012 #14
I certainly would prefer to vote for someone more progressive than Obama, but I am teddy51 Apr 2012 #17
You can vote for whomever you want--it won't change a thing CoffeeCat Apr 2012 #30
+1000 nt Mojorabbit Apr 2012 #63
The point, the lesson, & the problem, right there. nt dougolat Apr 2012 #187
Don't know -- the whole COUNTRY seems to be moving to the right lately. :( gateley Apr 2012 #137
I don't think it's the people who are moving right. The polls show that sabrina 1 Apr 2012 #190
Yeah, you're right on that. nt gateley Apr 2012 #194
K&R DeSwiss Apr 2012 #20
Going into Iraq Iliyah Apr 2012 #21
If only they went after war criminals with equal vigor. HooptieWagon Apr 2012 #22
k/r emilyg Apr 2012 #23
How many Wall Street bankers have been indicted? donheld Apr 2012 #25
Somehow this story will end up in the bullshit half truth folder like many other Obama uponit7771 Apr 2012 #27
What time is it? cliffordu Apr 2012 #28
Obama has us over a barrel. JDPriestly Apr 2012 #31
expect a mighty and angry populace to arise this summer who is sick of wars, corruption xiamiam Apr 2012 #52
Pure evil. girl gone mad Apr 2012 #37
I am amazed that people could get lathered up about something like this nolabels Apr 2012 #49
du rec. nt xchrom Apr 2012 #38
Obama bad Obama bad Obama bad. JoePhilly Apr 2012 #39
so sick of that ridiculous remark..on iggy for anyone who chooses that as their defense fyi..nt xiamiam Apr 2012 #53
Oh please no ... not iggy!!! JoePhilly Apr 2012 #64
I like the reactions blind partisans have, such as childlike taunting, LOL! just1voice Apr 2012 #59
OMFG!!! Partisans on a partisan website!!!... SidDithers Apr 2012 #67
You are a partisan? To what party do you belong, what state do you vote primary in? /nt Dragonfli Apr 2012 #77
... SidDithers Apr 2012 #78
.. Dragonfli Apr 2012 #79
I don't speak graphic, are you able to use English? Dragonfli Apr 2012 #81
He used to know only one word. Fuddnik Apr 2012 #110
Post removed Post removed Apr 2012 #115
Partisans of deception Hawkowl Apr 2012 #99
I read the articles and found both to be rather shrill. JoePhilly Apr 2012 #73
I'm putting you on Un-Ignore! randome Apr 2012 #74
Redemption!!! JoePhilly Apr 2012 #82
Well, between ProSense Apr 2012 #87
keep trying...w/t KG Apr 2012 #40
K&R (n/t) a2liberal Apr 2012 #44
So when is Obama going to indict Cheney? bahrbearian Apr 2012 #45
Presidents don't indict people, the Justice Department does Freddie Stubbs Apr 2012 #47
Right. Obama knows nothing about these prosecutions. If he did, he'd stop them! Better Believe It Apr 2012 #62
So, you are suggesting that the President should interfere with Justice Dept. prosecutions? Freddie Stubbs Apr 2012 #91
YES! EXACTLY! ALL Presidents indicate their priorities to the Justice Department. Better Believe It Apr 2012 #94
That's the irrefutable truth Mimosa Apr 2012 #192
And, poor, delicate, Obama has no say in his Justice Department. Tierra_y_Libertad Apr 2012 #70
Sure he does, but interfering with a prosecution could be construed as Freddie Stubbs Apr 2012 #92
The Justice Department can reset its priorities and decide it doesn't have a firm "espionage" case Better Believe It Apr 2012 #95
By whom? The Republicans? The media? Tierra_y_Libertad Apr 2012 #124
Would Obama be good if he did a Moscow Flash Mob dance? DevonRex Apr 2012 #54
I see red-baiting is alive and well. Nice. TBF Apr 2012 #90
Oh how silly. DevonRex Apr 2012 #114
I'm so glad to hear that because I thought you had a problem with BBI - TBF Apr 2012 #121
It's just a few, actually, the same few all the time. I am grateful to them because sabrina 1 Apr 2012 #191
Totally unsurprising stupidicus Apr 2012 #58
I completely agree Oilwellian Apr 2012 #129
Yes indeed! nt dougolat Apr 2012 #186
Bush and Cheney are still walking out there and lovuian Apr 2012 #60
Exposing torture is a crime..torturing or enabling torture isn't. Especially in campaign season. Tierra_y_Libertad Apr 2012 #66
Exposing torture is a crime..torturing or enabling torture isn't. Especially in campaign season. druidity33 Apr 2012 #128
Post removed Post removed Apr 2012 #71
Kicked and recommended. Uncle Joe Apr 2012 #72
+1 inna Apr 2012 #85
...this, plus the continued war on Legalized Marijuana Dispensaries are some of the more infuriating truebrit71 Apr 2012 #75
ACLU: In 2009 the Obama administration made 54 million decisions to classify government documents! Better Believe It Apr 2012 #86
The Good News ProSense Apr 2012 #100
It is because we have a system in place that clearly puts state secrets Rex Apr 2012 #89
It's no state secret that a few million Iraqis will NEVER forget us. nt patrice Apr 2012 #97
"... a rose by any other name ..." would still look like a rose. nt patrice Apr 2012 #96
So?...What are they going to do? bvar22 Apr 2012 #98
maybe the real story should be: the high crimes they didn't bother to even investigate G_j Apr 2012 #101
That's what GW and Jebby's visit was about to the WH Dont call me Shirley Apr 2012 #105
Whats wrong with everybody? rudycantfail Apr 2012 #117
There is a series of articles published daily by paid operatives trying to suppress the vote. NYC_SKP Apr 2012 #133
What's strange is some of those same paid operatives used to post anti-Bush articles.. Fumesucker Apr 2012 #136
That's Cunning!!! NYC_SKP Apr 2012 #138
Facts be damned. rudycantfail Apr 2012 #139
These articles: terrific distractions away from the real enemies. NYC_SKP Apr 2012 #141
So the progressive government whistleblowers are the enemy? Better Believe It Apr 2012 #146
Monsanto, Exxon, Consolidated Media, etc... NYC_SKP Apr 2012 #155
Yep, divide and conquer. joshcryer Apr 2012 #164
I am collecting a list of recently PPR'd posters. joshcryer Apr 2012 #143
Always interesting to see how "busy" they become closer to election time. NYC_SKP Apr 2012 #144
Do you think Homeland Security is drawing up the same list? Better Believe It Apr 2012 #148
Doubtful, HHS is against the left. joshcryer Apr 2012 #158
Kind of a non-sequiteur...??? cliffordu Apr 2012 #189
I have here in my hand a list Fumesucker Apr 2012 #154
Eh, merely protecting myself from false flag PYSOPS from the right. joshcryer Apr 2012 #159
Of course anyone who isn't deliriously happy with Obama is a right wing agitator. Fumesucker Apr 2012 #161
They've been PPR'd, they're obviously agitators. joshcryer Apr 2012 #163
I watched Hannah Bell get TSed.. Fumesucker Apr 2012 #165
Well, it's possible these posters are left wing agitators like that person... joshcryer Apr 2012 #167
Well, when you have nothing left here but pragmatic moderate centrists.. Fumesucker Apr 2012 #170
I have other more liberal sites to go to for that. joshcryer Apr 2012 #172
DU swings further to the right on nearly a daily basis.. Fumesucker Apr 2012 #174
I don't see that at all. joshcryer Apr 2012 #177
A quintessentially Republican idea straight from the Heritage Foundation.. Fumesucker Apr 2012 #180
Sort by replies. A lot of us post uncontroversial stuff that drops thanks to derision. joshcryer Apr 2012 #181
The ones I see doing the most damage to DU are those who constantly try to put a positive spin.. Fumesucker Apr 2012 #182
Those people are outnumbered though. joshcryer Apr 2012 #183
And yet you see a reason for attacking good DUers who don't march in lockstep brentspeak Apr 2012 #175
Who am I attacking? joshcryer Apr 2012 #176
"Agitators"...like Chris Hedges? brentspeak Apr 2012 #178
Nah, he just bought the line, probably due to ignorance. joshcryer Apr 2012 #179
Lord, I miss her Mimosa Apr 2012 #193
So you are claiming that my posted article is written by a paid Republican operative Better Believe It Apr 2012 #145
I think he/she meant that you were the paid operative.. SomethingFishy Apr 2012 #149
Expect a silent chorus of crickets..but more accusations of disloyalty for not toeing the party line Tierra_y_Libertad Apr 2012 #150
sacrebleu! NYC_SKP Apr 2012 #153
What you just said is one of the reasons cliffordu Apr 2012 #188
I strongly disagree with your assertion that critics of the Administration are paid disruptors. Leopolds Ghost Apr 2012 #203
Oh, and the government agency my dad went up against Leopolds Ghost Apr 2012 #204
I hope you remain active here, you do much good work. (nt) NYC_SKP Apr 2012 #209
Still active, but I have Leopolds Ghost Apr 2012 #210
By this standard Richard Armitage and Robert Novak are whistleblowers. joshcryer Apr 2012 #135
Really? When were they opposed to torture? Better Believe It Apr 2012 #152
Really? ProSense Apr 2012 #156
"Why did he wait until 2007 to reveal this information? " girl gone mad Apr 2012 #199
I didn't know this guy was indicted for being opposed to torture. joshcryer Apr 2012 #157
For opposing it and helping to expose it with super secret documents! Throw the key away! Better Believe It Apr 2012 #166
If he is convicted and then his sentence isn't commuted... joshcryer Apr 2012 #169
How much hard labor time do you think this lefty liberal should get? Better Believe It Apr 2012 #171
John Kiriakou lied about how many times Zubaydah was waterboarded. He's no lefty. joshcryer Apr 2012 #173
So you believe he engaged in espionage on behalf of what nation or terrorist group? Better Believe It Apr 2012 #196
Bradley Manning unionworks Apr 2012 #195
Did Nash of CSNY write this song about Manning? Leopolds Ghost Apr 2012 #205
Co-wrote it with the other guy unionworks Apr 2012 #208
Good. mzmolly Apr 2012 #211
So much for transparency. BlueIris Apr 2012 #212
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»President Obama Indicts S...»Reply #55