Reply #33

In the discussion thread: Will justice only be served if George Zimmerman is convicted? [View all]

Response to Becka2515 (Reply #20)

Fri Apr 13, 2012, 12:11 PM

obamanut2012 (9,971 posts)

33. The poster didn't mention M1

Reply to this post

Back to OP Alert abuse Link to post in-thread

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum

Replies to this discussion thread

128 replies	Author	Time	Post
Will justice only be served if George Zimmerman is convicted? [View all]	Snake Alchemist	Apr 2012	OP
The whole thing has already been prejudged.	dkf	Apr 2012	#1
That will definitely be a key finding. nt	Snake Alchemist	Apr 2012	#4
I agree completely!	HIMYM	Apr 2012	#99
Has Fox News convicted Zimmerman? nt	greyl	Apr 2012	#107
Since I am finding it extremely difficult to get the facts in this case	rock	Apr 2012	#2
Blackstone: Better 10 guilty go free than one innocent suffer	ProgressiveProfessor	Apr 2012	#3
It's based on his state of mind.	dkf	Apr 2012	#6
With the stand your ground law, he might be really not guilty.	LiberalArkie	Apr 2012	#5
Good point	treestar	Apr 2012	#7
How difficult should it be to claim self-defense?	Snake Alchemist	Apr 2012	#8
Many states - it is an affirmative defense	treestar	Apr 2012	#120
My understanding of the law is that you can	arthritisR_US	Apr 2012	#30
I thought it meant though you could retreat, you don't have to	treestar	Apr 2012	#121
I may be wrong but I thought it only	arthritisR_US	Apr 2012	#122
It will be a step in the right direction	BklnDem75	Apr 2012	#9
so regardless of what comes out in trial, you've	Snake Alchemist	Apr 2012	#12
Yes	BklnDem75	Apr 2012	#14
glad you are that confident. nt	Snake Alchemist	Apr 2012	#21
Practice makes perfect	BklnDem75	Apr 2012	#25
What about Casey Anthony, OJ, Duke Lacrosse, Reginald Denny?	Snake Alchemist	Apr 2012	#40
There was no verdict in the Duke case because	NoGOPZone	Apr 2012	#42
Very true. But many were convinced of their guilt early on. nt	Snake Alchemist	Apr 2012	#44
Those cases makes my point more, don't you think?	BklnDem75	Apr 2012	#45
No. nt	Snake Alchemist	Apr 2012	#46
So you believe justice was served in those cases?	BklnDem75	Apr 2012	#50
Maybe. Hopefully, the jurors made the decision they thought was best. nt	Snake Alchemist	Apr 2012	#51
Seriously? Caylee Anthony had justice with that verdict?	BklnDem75	Apr 2012	#56
So you're sure she did not? nt	Snake Alchemist	Apr 2012	#59
Once again, yes	BklnDem75	Apr 2012	#60
Glad to know that you are better informed than many juries. You should sell your services. nt	Snake Alchemist	Apr 2012	#61
Your mistake is thinking jurors are more informed simply because they're jurors	BklnDem75	Apr 2012	#65
No. But I do believe they may be more informed than joe sixpack off the street.	Snake Alchemist	Apr 2012	#67
Have you ever been a part of a jury pool?	BklnDem75	Apr 2012	#69
yes. the media often is inaccurate. especially initially. nt	Snake Alchemist	Apr 2012	#82
I was referring to live coverage, not speculation.	BklnDem75	Apr 2012	#91
There was live coverage of the shooting? Then it should be a quick decision by the jury. nt	Snake Alchemist	Apr 2012	#92
Mind sticking to the subject?	BklnDem75	Apr 2012	#93
You said there was live coverage, no? nt	Snake Alchemist	Apr 2012	#94
Of court cases, remember?	BklnDem75	Apr 2012	#97
Oh, then I agree that if someone watches 100% of the live coverage and reviews 100% of the evidence	Snake Alchemist	Apr 2012	#100
You're welcome	BklnDem75	Apr 2012	#103
Wait, are you going to buy me a 4 million dollar ring? nt	Snake Alchemist	Apr 2012	#104
I'm pretty confident myself	WeekendWarrior	Apr 2012	#27
Surprisingly, you are allowed to follow people. nt	Snake Alchemist	Apr 2012	#34
I think if the police tell you not to and you're carrying a gun	WeekendWarrior	Apr 2012	#41
Does not mean you cannot do it though.	Snake Alchemist	Apr 2012	#43
You're right, he doesn't have to, but	WeekendWarrior	Apr 2012	#53
In your mind? Hopefully, the trial will leave little room for doubt in whichever direction it takes	Snake Alchemist	Apr 2012	#55
You're Kidding, Right?	WeekendWarrior	Apr 2012	#62
Confronting him?	Snake Alchemist	Apr 2012	#63
Yes, and they sometimes get it wrong	WeekendWarrior	Apr 2012	#64
Hopefully, all evidence will be reviewed and the right verdict will be reached. Whatever that	Snake Alchemist	Apr 2012	#66
I agree. And in my opinion	WeekendWarrior	Apr 2012	#108
I am, too.	H2O Man	Apr 2012	#127
Of course	SaltyBro	Apr 2012	#10
why do we even need a trial? nt	Snake Alchemist	Apr 2012	#13
because that is how our country works	SaltyBro	Apr 2012	#17
But if we already know the correct verdict than maybe it is a waste of time. nt	Snake Alchemist	Apr 2012	#35
Please stop it	Becka2515	Apr 2012	#20
The poster didn't mention M1	obamanut2012	Apr 2012	#33
The post i replied too	Becka2515	Apr 2012	#79
Justice will be served...	HooptieWagon	Apr 2012	#11
Barring some heretofore unknown, definitively exculpatory, evidence, yes. n/t	Egalitarian Thug	Apr 2012	#15
Probably a dumb question at this point, but was an autopsy performed on Trayvon?	Lex	Apr 2012	#16
The autopsy should answer many questions.	OneGrassRoot	Apr 2012	#22
Yes, the autopsy results will be key then.	Lex	Apr 2012	#26
Exactly. n/t	OneGrassRoot	Apr 2012	#28
I was thinking the same thing	obamanut2012	Apr 2012	#36
The affidavit the prosecution filed during yesterday's hearing	NoGOPZone	Apr 2012	#38
In the Special Prosecutor's Affadavit of Probable Cause Trayvon was shot in the chest	csziggy	Apr 2012	#77
Of course not	leftynyc	Apr 2012	#18
Check out some of the posts above ours and you will see some will only be satisfied with one	Snake Alchemist	Apr 2012	#37
Then some people are not interested in justice	leftynyc	Apr 2012	#47
People walk all the time for crimes they have committed	RZM	Apr 2012	#19
Most DUers wanted the victim to have a day in court	Johonny	Apr 2012	#23
The goalpost seems to be moving	Life Long Dem	Apr 2012	#24
Justice will be served when we know the facts of this case	Skip_In_Boulder	Apr 2012	#29
I think that's obvious.	Marr	Apr 2012	#31
Chased? Maybe. nt	Snake Alchemist	Apr 2012	#39
Pursued, at least, AFTER being commanded not to do so.	Lex	Apr 2012	#48
He was commanded? nt	Snake Alchemist	Apr 2012	#49
Told, instructed, advised. He pursued anyway.	Lex	Apr 2012	#52
I believe he was told it was not necessary. Far cry from a command. nt	Snake Alchemist	Apr 2012	#54
Fact remains the 911 record shows he was in pursuit.	Lex	Apr 2012	#57
Yes, and you are allowed to do that. nt	Snake Alchemist	Apr 2012	#58
I believe your not allowed to be the aggressor and then claim the SYG law as a defense.	Life Long Dem	Apr 2012	#72
I do not believe that the law considers following an	Snake Alchemist	Apr 2012	#84
Stalking is a form of aggression.	Life Long Dem	Apr 2012	#96
I am not sure at what threshhold that it becomes stalking. nt	Snake Alchemist	Apr 2012	#98
Could be a repetitive thing	Life Long Dem	Apr 2012	#102
Not maybe. This isn't in dispute.	Marr	Apr 2012	#71
following is not chasing. nt	Snake Alchemist	Apr 2012	#81
Yes it is.	Marr	Apr 2012	#86
If p then q <> If q then p	Snake Alchemist	Apr 2012	#88
So is it your contention that Zimmerman needed to "follow" Martin...	bluesbassman	Apr 2012	#95
No, merely that following is not always chasing. nt	Snake Alchemist	Apr 2012	#101
Justice can only be served if he gets a fair trial	Yo_Mama	Apr 2012	#32
We are not the jury	Kesiyu	Apr 2012	#68
What proof of that "wound" do you have? What proof of Zimmy "was definitely under Trayvon" do you	uppityperson	Apr 2012	#70
The video enhanced by ABC News	Kesiyu	Apr 2012	#73
That is not proof of either of your assertions. Try again.	uppityperson	Apr 2012	#75
I guess the jury will have to decide if that's a wound	Kesiyu	Apr 2012	#109
If the police don't have any photos of Zimmerman's injuries then he has no evidence of injuries	Life Long Dem	Apr 2012	#78
How does that video prove Zimmy was under Trayvon? I don't see it, would you point it out for me?	uppityperson	Apr 2012	#80
I didn't say it proves it	Kesiyu	Apr 2012	#110
This message was self-deleted by its author	BklnDem75	Apr 2012	#112
We just have to believe Zimmerman was tended to by paramedics...	BklnDem75	Apr 2012	#74
Yeah... life-threatening damage that didn't even require a butterfly bandage.	gkhouston	Apr 2012	#76
You say "supposed gash" but it could be a welt	Kesiyu	Apr 2012	#111
All this is beside the point...	cyberswede	Apr 2012	#113
So far, everyone that went with the 'wound to the head' story	BklnDem75	Apr 2012	#114
Never say "everyone"	Kesiyu	Apr 2012	#116
Actually if you read your own article, it's talking about the media,	BklnDem75	Apr 2012	#117
Never say "never".	uppityperson	Apr 2012	#125
No	Proud Liberal Dem	Apr 2012	#83
+1 - Exactly what I wanted to say n/t	MrBig	Apr 2012	#87
You've been on the fence since the beginning of this	Rex	Apr 2012	#85
Very true. I have been on the fence.	Snake Alchemist	Apr 2012	#89
I really want to watch the trial.	Rex	Apr 2012	#105
Is justice a real thing, or is it just something we tell ourselves to make life seem less shity? nt	ZombieHorde	Apr 2012	#90
Depends on if a person believes in the concept of evil and good imo.	Rex	Apr 2012	#106
I believe good and evil are emotional reactions to perceived stimuli.	ZombieHorde	Apr 2012	#118
I don't really know.	Rex	Apr 2012	#119
Maybe, maybe not.	H2O Man	Apr 2012	#115
Only if he is found guilty by a jury based on evidence.	Better Believe It	Apr 2012	#123
Hopefully a fair trial	chrisa	Apr 2012	#124
He clearly shot and killed an unarmed teenager.	alarimer	Apr 2012	#126
my opinion is	barbtries	Apr 2012	#128

Edit History

Please login to view edit histories.