Reply #27

And that's why you're doing a little song and dance routine to try and change the subject.

That's a very old "debating" tactic frequently used by untalented people who lack debating skills!

I sure hope you're not in that category!

But, if that's the best you've got you have my sympathy.

Why not just admit you made an "error" or "mistake", if that is what in fact what happened, when you made that claim?

Or would you rather try yet another effort to evade a response to my post by changing the subject?

Once again contrary to your post is what I actually wrote at your link:

"It could have been (a weather satellite) but if you know for certain that it wasn't please post your information.

I think either it was a very simple basic weather satellite or a communications device similiar to Russia's first satellite launched in 1957.

I'd guess it was a pretty small satellite because their rocket doesn't look much more powerful or bigger than the old "Vanguard" rocket used to launch our satellites in 1957-59."

Do you understand the difference between my writing "it could have been" a weather satellite and your false quote claiming that I wrote "it was a weather satellite"?