Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Showing Original Post only (View all)

FLPanhandle

(7,107 posts)
Sat Feb 6, 2016, 05:05 PM Feb 2016

Proposed Iraqi Law Would Allow Girls As Young As 9 To Marry [View all]

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/04/30/iraq-child-marriage-law-vote_n_5234828.html



When Iraqis head to the polls on April 30, they will have the option of voting for a party that endorses a proposed new law that allows marital rape and makes it legal for girls as young as 9 to marry.

The Jaafari Personal Status Law, which would affect only Iraq's majority Shiite population, was already approved by Iraq’s Council of Ministers in February and is slated for a vote after a new parliament is elected, the Washington Post reports.

The bill was first introduced to the council by the Iraqi Justice Minister, who is a member of the Islamist Fadila party and reportedly an ally of Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki, who currently seeks reelection.

"This is an attempt by Fadila to show Iraqis that they represent the Shia and want to make their identity clear before the election,” professor Hassan al-Shimari, a political analyst at Baghdad University, told The Guardian. “Everything is changing on a daily basis, and the division between the Shia themselves keeps being redefined."

The proposed law does not explicitly set forth an age limit for marriage but designates 9 as the age by which a child can get divorced (implying that a child can be married before then). It also legalizes marital rape, bans Muslim men from marrying non-Muslim women, gives husbands full guardianship over their wives and prevents women from leaving the house without their husband’s consent, Human Rights Watch notes.

----------------------------------------------------------------

I guess their "logic" is, if it was good enough for Muhammad, then it's good enough for other Muslim men.
43 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
But, but, but 1939 Feb 2016 #1
That's what Islam does. Who can be surprised. nt thereismore Feb 2016 #2
Get them before the drones do. PeoViejo Feb 2016 #3
Omg .... polly7 Feb 2016 #4
"It also legalizes marital rape". Nye Bevan Feb 2016 #5
But who are we to criticize hifiguy Feb 2016 #14
Proposed Iraqi Law Would Force Girls As Young As 9 To Marry Wounded Bear Feb 2016 #6
You gave a much more accurate title. FLPanhandle Feb 2016 #7
Because children that young don't 'choose' much... Wounded Bear Feb 2016 #8
Iraq used to be one of the most secular countries in the ME malaise Feb 2016 #9
Saddam was an asshole, but he kept Islam culture under strict control. FLPanhandle Feb 2016 #11
It is one of history's weirder ironies that the only muslim majority countries hifiguy Feb 2016 #13
There are websites that show life in Iran before the Islamic revolution FLPanhandle Feb 2016 #15
misleading, education for women increased AFTER the revolution . women are more educated JI7 Feb 2016 #16
Have you even read the Human Right's reports on Women in Iran? FLPanhandle Feb 2016 #17
are you an apologist for the oppressive shah ? before the revolution women were NOT equal in JI7 Feb 2016 #18
Simple question: Yes or No? FLPanhandle Feb 2016 #19
i would say it's about the same . i would probably prefer to live there right now than under the JI7 Feb 2016 #20
Then you aren't female or you aren't well informed. FLPanhandle Feb 2016 #22
i am informed about education in iran for women , i know iranian women personally JI7 Feb 2016 #24
LOL FLPanhandle Feb 2016 #29
i'm not a man , and i'm comparing iran under the islamic clerics to under the shah . iranian women JI7 Feb 2016 #30
.. AngryAmish Feb 2016 #38
It's possible to increase education for women and repress them at the same time, you know NickB79 Feb 2016 #33
well, yeah that was a problem during the shah also. both are shitty JI7 Feb 2016 #34
Islamic clerics "pushed for women to be equal"??? hifiguy Feb 2016 #21
Another apologist. FLPanhandle Feb 2016 #23
in education JI7 Feb 2016 #25
And cloistered third-class citizens in all other ways, hifiguy Feb 2016 #26
lack of education automatically does that as under the shah JI7 Feb 2016 #27
You are kidding, aren't you? hifiguy Feb 2016 #31
they have more access to education now than before JI7 Feb 2016 #32
And it's clearly doing them no good at all NickB79 Feb 2016 #35
they all suck including the life under the shah JI7 Feb 2016 #40
That statement belongs in the "not even wrong" category. AngryAmish Feb 2016 #37
Ugh Liberal_in_LA Feb 2016 #10
Calling islam barbaric is an insult hifiguy Feb 2016 #12
This story is from 2014. Eugene Feb 2016 #28
Yes... Deuce Feb 2016 #41
Shhhhhhhhh... Scurrilous Feb 2016 #42
Yeah, this is a culture demanding democracy. AngryAmish Feb 2016 #36
This message was self-deleted by its author tenderfoot Feb 2016 #39
Saddam Hussein was a dictator, BUT Iraq was under secular law Lydia Leftcoast Feb 2016 #43
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Proposed Iraqi Law Would ...