Would you support a Constitutional Amendment to change House terms from 2 years to 4 years? [View all]

[Algernon Moncrieff]

Would you support changing the terms of House members from 2 years to 4 years?

The argument for 4-year house terms is that House members essentially are in constant campaign mode. Since they are always having to fundraise, and work for a re-election that is right around the corner, it makes them more susceptible to outside interest groups with deep pockets.

The argument against 4-year house terms is that the 2-year election cycle makes House members more responsive to the public mood, and more responsive to constituent needs.

14 votes, 1 pass | Time left: Unlimited
	I'd support a Constitutional Amendment making House terms 4 years instead of 2 years
	1 (7%)
	I'd oppose a Constitutional Amendment making House terms 4 years instead of 2 years
	13 (93%)
	1 DU member did not wish to select any of the options provided.
Show usernames Disclaimer: This is an Internet poll