Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

KewlKat

(5,624 posts)

16. certainly no supreme court nominee should be put forth.

Reply to madamesilverspurs (Original post)

Mon Mar 20, 2017, 03:54 PM

Mar 2017

same excuse as the gropers used on President Obama......the Con is in his last year of office, so shouldn't get to nominate anyone......

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

19 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Given what's coming out of the Comey hearing [View all] madamesilverspurs Mar 2017 OP

Recommended. H2O Man Mar 2017 #1

I totally agree gopiscrap Mar 2017 #2

AND his SCOTUS nominee. nt tblue37 Mar 2017 #3

We can request all we want. elleng Mar 2017 #4

however, there is no constitutional obligation for the senate to confirm any nominee. unblock Mar 2017 #7

The McTurtle rule! murielm99 Mar 2017 #9

Doom on McTurtles everywhere Augiedog Mar 2017 #15

An "abundance of caution." dchill Mar 2017 #5

We need to gibraltar72 Mar 2017 #6

Agreed... N_E_1 for Tennis Mar 2017 #8

Yep. I don't see any confirmation as being valid. nt joet67 Mar 2017 #10

the dems are in the minority you can make all the requests you want Ohioblue22 Mar 2017 #11

Your representatives are always encouraging Plucketeer Mar 2017 #13

The GOP controls confirmation hearings BainsBane Mar 2017 #12

oh, yeah barbtries Mar 2017 #14

certainly no supreme court nominee should be put forth. KewlKat Mar 2017 #16

K&R nt ProudProgressiveNow Mar 2017 #17

Yes. At least "until we know what the hell is going on". n/t Mister Ed Mar 2017 #18

. eleny Mar 2017 #19

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Given what's coming out o...»Reply #16