Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Showing Original Post only (View all)
98 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
We just need to rename it Jonny Appleseed Apr 2017 #1
But these corporations are anti-democracy by their nature. guillaumeb Apr 2017 #2
Those wolves are wolves that weren't raised in the wild. Jonny Appleseed Apr 2017 #16
That's a meaningless concept... brooklynite Apr 2017 #66
"because 40% of the people want on" Jonny Appleseed Apr 2017 #68
yes, it's time to make changes. WhiteTara Apr 2017 #3
No it is no...we have no power at all ... we need to win elections and overturn Demsrule86 Apr 2017 #58
I didn't say I wasn't going to vote WhiteTara Apr 2017 #67
You need money to win elections these days... Demsrule86 Apr 2017 #72
Like I said, it's their turn. WhiteTara Apr 2017 #73
Right. Which, as long as Citizens United is in effect will guarantee that we lose every election, Squinch Apr 2017 #4
It's been done Doremus Apr 2017 #23
Yep. It can be done. TDale313 Apr 2017 #34
Since Citizens United, it never has been done, so what makes you think so? Squinch Apr 2017 #45
Maybe during presidential years but not off year elections. Demsrule86 Apr 2017 #59
Yep,maybe next time Go Vols Apr 2017 #83
That's an issue of the candidate, not the money. If we require that our candidates don't take Squinch Apr 2017 #44
Flaunting our purity is exactly what we need to do. Doremus Apr 2017 #50
No one cares about purity...jobs yes ...health care yes...purity no. Demsrule86 Apr 2017 #61
Did you notice the election we just had? Squinch Apr 2017 #77
Bullshit...no one outside of those who are uber critical of the Democratic Party ... Demsrule86 Apr 2017 #57
You're agreeing with me. Squinch Apr 2017 #78
Sorry must have been to a different poster...but I am glad we agree...great minds think alike? Demsrule86 Apr 2017 #91
+1000 brer cat Apr 2017 #93
If this was a post, it'd get alerted zipplewrath Apr 2017 #5
if true that would be both stupid and counterproductive eniwetok Apr 2017 #7
If the Nation keeps coming after the Democratic Party Demsrule86 Apr 2017 #62
Can't disagree more. KPN Apr 2017 #71
I wonder what side the Nation is on...They are helping Trump and hurting our chances to save the Demsrule86 Apr 2017 #92
How so? I don't see it. KPN Apr 2017 #95
Attacking the party as unworthy ...makes people less likely to vote and/or Demsrule86 Apr 2017 #96
Well, I can't argue that attacking the Party as unworthy prior to the election could KPN Apr 2017 #98
Why do you want to sow discord and discontent? Cary Apr 2017 #6
why are you? eniwetok Apr 2017 #10
What does that even mean? synergie Apr 2017 #24
"The party is corporate" is something that has been repeated over and over online. Hmmmmm.... Squinch Apr 2017 #46
No it doesn't...this article discourages people from voting for Democrats... Demsrule86 Apr 2017 #63
here's where I disagree with the article eniwetok Apr 2017 #8
The Nation helped Trump win. athena Apr 2017 #28
utter bullcrap eniwetok Apr 2017 #29
Good luck moving the Democratic Party left after a loss like this. athena Apr 2017 #30
I have no idea what you're talking about. eniwetok Apr 2017 #33
Oh yes, the wonderful years after W won during which the Democratic Party moved left! athena Apr 2017 #60
you seem determined to ignore the defects in the system eniwetok Apr 2017 #81
Yes they did...I cancelled my subscription and never read that rag anymore. Demsrule86 Apr 2017 #65
They do well under a Republican presidency. athena Apr 2017 #69
It is true...I subscribed to Washington Post, Mother Jones, New York Times and Demsrule86 Apr 2017 #70
How 'bout sticking *with* the Democratic party? UTUSN Apr 2017 #9
Are you going to criticize Bill Clinton for trying to change the party? eniwetok Apr 2017 #12
+1 ronnie624 Apr 2017 #15
But if the Dem Party is to mean anything it should be... eniwetok Apr 2017 #20
What is this corporate path you speak of, and can one see it synergie Apr 2017 #25
I didn't think this was some state secret... eniwetok Apr 2017 #32
Apparently it is. synergie Apr 2017 #42
Unaware? Really? KPN Apr 2017 #74
Indeed, mine is based in reality, not wishful thinking and revionistic history. synergie Apr 2017 #94
Huh? Gerrymandering? KPN Apr 2017 #97
the problem is your blanket assumption that a push from this direction is all empty sloganeering. JCanete Apr 2017 #84
There is no comparrison between the far left and the tea party. JCanete Apr 2017 #36
You might want to tell that to the folks who are branding themselves this way. synergie Apr 2017 #39
I think the show is worth-while. I've heard them say we need to get that kind of JCanete Apr 2017 #41
Exactly. Instead of relentlessly attacking it, for a change. athena Apr 2017 #31
I think we need to keep Russia out our elections FrenchieCat Apr 2017 #11
+1. This right here. Tarheel_Dem Apr 2017 #13
You're not going to "undo" anything ronnie624 Apr 2017 #14
We're going to have to start addressing the small fraction of the electorate synergie Apr 2017 #40
An event can have more than one cause. Jim Lane Apr 2017 #17
Russian interference would mean NOTHING if not for the fact.... eniwetok Apr 2017 #21
So eschewing large donations is your means to changing that? Kay... Squinch Apr 2017 #47
apples and organges eniwetok Apr 2017 #48
WTF are you talking about? Your arguments are nothing but a gish gallop of Squinch Apr 2017 #76
That's YOUR take eniwetok Apr 2017 #79
SMH. You have learned nothing. Have a nice day. Squinch Apr 2017 #80
Post removed Post removed Apr 2017 #82
Post removed Post removed Apr 2017 #85
Wait you weren't convinced by all the caps, bold and punctuations? JTFrog Apr 2017 #86
No. Because I'm morally bankrupt, doncha know? Squinch Apr 2017 #87
But ... ... ... !! nt JTFrog Apr 2017 #88
1)we must end republican election fraud 2) move dems out of the cities and spread out n t msongs Apr 2017 #18
WHY should anyone move to compensate for the absurdities of an antidemocratic system???? eniwetok Apr 2017 #22
You are gonna hate what we are doing in California then. JTFrog Apr 2017 #89
30-40% of U.S. Americans are racists and fascists. Hillary Clinton ran on a progressive platform... hunter Apr 2017 #19
What a happy article! PatrickforO Apr 2017 #26
You overlook the fact that tens of millions of Americans Gman Apr 2017 #27
that is a perception that has to be undone. If we taxed right and regulated corporations right, JCanete Apr 2017 #37
And pick daisies? fleabiscuit Apr 2017 #35
After the elections in NJ JustAnotherGen Apr 2017 #38
Here's an example of what's wrong with our party's self appointed beltway strategy geniuses: Warren DeMontague Apr 2017 #43
Getting rid of corporate money won't change the fact that politicians bloviate on TV SharonClark Apr 2017 #49
It's not the bloviating. It's the pre-emptive surrendering that's the problem. Warren DeMontague Apr 2017 #52
You're right.. JHan Apr 2017 #54
Maybe a little premature? kentuck Apr 2017 #51
Sigh. The same article that says Dems need to abandon big-dollar fundraising stopbush Apr 2017 #53
The whole idea from those who insist they are the only pure Democrats, where they Squinch Apr 2017 #90
This... Demsrule86 Apr 2017 #55
Democrats need to speak for people rather than Wall Street/Silicon Valley alarimer Apr 2017 #56
And absolutely must transform the Republican Party. Orsino Apr 2017 #64
This article is now dated. The concepts have been hashed over here many times. KPN Apr 2017 #75
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»The Nation article: we mu...