General Discussion

rocktivity

(44,572 posts)

35. But the difference in your case is that your CEO was FORCED out, and you can PROVE it

Thu Jul 12, 2012, 03:31 PM

Jul 2012

Last edited Fri Jul 13, 2012, 09:46 AM - Edit history (3)

Presumably, he didn't get to put his signature on anything after you escorted him off the premises. And most important, if you needed to prove that he was CEO in name only, you had a copy of the severance agreement to wave around.

Romney claimed to have left Bain, period. If it really WAS an "administrative leave," WHY didn't he say so...because he was, in reality, FIRED???

rocktivity

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

39 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Romneyland responds: 'This is nothing more than a quirk in the law' [View all] ProSense Jul 2012 OP

did his blind trust sign the documents? n/t Enrique Jul 2012 #1

No, one of the other managing directors signed. Igel Jul 2012 #18

Showing him to be the CEO, Chairman of the Board and sole share-holder, no? truebrit71 Jul 2012 #36

An amended return is quite clearly labeled on top as "amended return". You can't miss it. xtraxritical Jul 2012 #22

I really hope there's something to this sharp_stick Jul 2012 #2

Drip, drip, drip. hifiguy Jul 2012 #3

I just hope you're right. Xyzse Jul 2012 #4

Mitt, like his father... TeamPooka Jul 2012 #5

Ah, yes. The IRS and the SEC are, yanno, quirky that way. myrna minx Jul 2012 #6

Quirk = ProSense Jul 2012 #10

Even if he wasn't calling the shots after 1999 aint_no_life_nowhere Jul 2012 #7

if he's signing documents, he IS in charge!! progressivebydesign Jul 2012 #8

As far as I have read he helped the Olympics by obtaining federal money siligut Jul 2012 #17

If he is so proud of success while heading Bain Capital, Why would his team be so defensive rustydog Jul 2012 #9

Excellent point klook Jul 2012 #39

There's something 'quirky' about this! young_at_heart Jul 2012 #11

So, I'm really not unemployed? Then why don't I get checks from my former employer... DCKit Jul 2012 #12

I wonder if The Boston Globe got their hands on Raven Jul 2012 #13

A "quirk"??? Maven Jul 2012 #14

Because sometimes the laws dictate what you have to say? Igel Jul 2012 #21

But the difference in your case is that your CEO was FORCED out, and you can PROVE it rocktivity Jul 2012 #35

To the 1%ers, laws are "quirky" and the constitution is "quaint" n/t VWolf Jul 2012 #15

A "quirk" than can net him 5 years in the Federal pen. CanonRay Jul 2012 #16

Explaining things away as a "quirk" is an age-old ruse. If you will. JBoy Jul 2012 #19

There it is the NDD that is so helpful grantcart Jul 2012 #20

It's simple, really. Documents don't lie. Avalux Jul 2012 #23

Wasn't he responsible to the shareholders to make sure 'quirks' didn't happen? JHB Jul 2012 #24

I wish something would come of this cwydro Jul 2012 #25

A "quirk" equals a bald-faced lie. kentuck Jul 2012 #26

Well, that quirk seems to make Mitt a felon Scootaloo Jul 2012 #27

I think we can figure out why he hasn't disclosed his tax returns. lumpy Jul 2012 #28

You know that silly little quirk in the law... BlueToTheBone Jul 2012 #29

In other words, guilty BeyondGeography Jul 2012 #30

See ... 1StrongBlackMan Jul 2012 #31

This message was self-deleted by its author bupkus Jul 2012 #32

So far we have "Quirkey" and "Playing games" Spitfire of ATJ Jul 2012 #33

I'll have to remember that the next time I get hauled before a judge. Ganja Ninja Jul 2012 #34

You can bet that if someone else was Bain's top corporate officer, rMoney's name would be gone riderinthestorm Jul 2012 #37

George Bush really wasn't President from 2001-2009 ThoughtCriminal Jul 2012 #38