Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

Showing Original Post only (View all)

Omaha Steve

(100,002 posts)
Mon Mar 23, 2015, 07:48 PM Mar 2015

Justices struggle with free speech case over license plates [View all]

Source: AP-Excite

By MARK SHERMAN

WASHINGTON (AP) — In a dispute over a proposed Confederate battle flag license plate, the Supreme Court struggled Monday to balance worries about government censorship and concerns that offensive messages could, at worst, incite violence.

Nearly 150 years after the end of the Civil War, the justices heard arguments in a case over Texas' refusal to issue a license plate bearing the battle flag. Nine other states allow drivers to display plates with the flag, which remains both a potent image of heritage and a racially charged symbol of repression.

Specialty license plates are big business in Texas. They brought in $17.6 million last year and state officials said there are now nearly 450 messages to choose from, from "Choose Life" to the Boy Scouts and hamburger chains.

The state rarely rejects a specialty plate, but it did turn down a request by the Texas division of the Sons of Confederate Veterans for a license plate with its logo bearing the battle flag. The group's lawsuit led to Monday's hearing.

FULL story at link.


Texas Solicitor General Scott Keller, attorney for petitioners, speaks to reporters outside the Supreme Court in Washington, Monday, March 23, 2015, after the court heard arguments in Walker v. Sons of Confederate Vets case. The Supreme Court struggled Monday in a dispute over a proposed Confederate battle flag license plate to balance worries about government censorship and concerns that offensive messages could, at worst, incite violence. (AP Photo/Molly Riley)


Read more: http://apnews.excite.com/article/20150323/us-supreme-court-license-plates-b11be053da.html

57 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Texas will likely lose, with the result being every state cancelling their speciality license plate geek tragedy Mar 2015 #1
that's fine by me. Javaman Mar 2015 #17
Why? It is a great revenue stream Telcontar Mar 2015 #32
because... Javaman Mar 2015 #37
Free speech my rosy red ass... TreasonousBastard Mar 2015 #2
DING DING DING! TreasonousBastard, you're our grand prize winner! rocktivity Mar 2015 #4
Very well put. cosmicone Mar 2015 #5
I say a symbol is not speech. They could put their name on the plate. 7962 Mar 2015 #3
Doesnt matter what you say or what I say what matters is what the court says. nt cstanleytech Mar 2015 #6
Well of course, but we're all giving opinions here. nt 7962 Mar 2015 #13
so banning the wearing of black armbands or peace symbols during the Vietnam War onenote Mar 2015 #29
Not to mention things like christx30 Mar 2015 #34
Wearing thew North Vietnamese flag wouldnt be OK with me 7962 Mar 2015 #38
Well, I suppose you're consistent onenote Mar 2015 #39
Like I said, a flag is NOT "speech", IMO. SPEAKING is speech. 7962 Mar 2015 #43
Would you be ok if a christx30 Mar 2015 #45
NO. But this is a question of the state sanctioning something. Your flag isnt state sanctioned 7962 Mar 2015 #49
is a peace symbol speech? onenote Mar 2015 #47
As I mentioned above, this is about the state sanctioning something, not what YOU say. 7962 Mar 2015 #50
Texas made license plates partly a private venue dariomax Mar 2015 #53
the first amendment and government speech onenote Mar 2015 #56
License plates should be easy-to-read numbers and letters. Nothing more. Throd Mar 2015 #7
I so agree. marble falls Mar 2015 #15
If a license plate is speech, does that mean the state owes us cars? n/t Gore1FL Mar 2015 #8
Equal access to an instrument of free speech? I like it! marble falls Mar 2015 #16
The govermet should give us free books? dariomax Mar 2015 #21
Not sure I follow with the free books logic. Gore1FL Mar 2015 #22
nobody is asking for free license plates dariomax Mar 2015 #23
The vehicle is the vehicle to excercise the free speech. Gore1FL Mar 2015 #24
isn't Texas making money out of speech? dariomax Mar 2015 #25
Texas is not obligated to make Conderate license plates any more than it is obligated to Gore1FL Mar 2015 #31
Nobody disputes that the plates are identifiers dariomax Mar 2015 #33
Obviously they can Gore1FL Mar 2015 #41
Most definately! stone space Mar 2015 #27
Texas... secondvariety Mar 2015 #9
Wow, that is bonkers! caraher Mar 2015 #36
I would think that the Sons of Confederate Veterans are dead. Who are these assholes that are suing? winstars Mar 2015 #10
They should put the white flag of surrender because........ wolfie001 Mar 2015 #11
I don't know... jmowreader Mar 2015 #12
Asshole alert. blackspade Mar 2015 #14
Only in Amurica do we display on vamity plates? benld74 Mar 2015 #18
"The state rarely rejects a specialty plate" Bullcrap. yellowcanine Mar 2015 #19
those "other times" have not been discussed in the SCOTUS dariomax Mar 2015 #26
There is a difference between specialty plates and vanity plates missingthebigdog Mar 2015 #30
I understand that but think the basic principle for rejecting is similar. yellowcanine Mar 2015 #42
Well, a flag is not language, thats how its different. 7962 Mar 2015 #44
A flag is language. former9thward Mar 2015 #51
Correct. A burning cross is speech too dariomax Mar 2015 #54
If the neo-confederates win does this mean neo-Nazis can have a swastika plate? yellowcanine Mar 2015 #20
None, really. nomorenomore08 Mar 2015 #35
My Florida Tag says Choice in Polish katmondoo Mar 2015 #28
I Like the Idea of Racist Tags Sparhawk60 Mar 2015 #40
This does not make much sense sadoldgirl Mar 2015 #46
First Amendment to the United States Constitution onenote Mar 2015 #48
SCOTUS decision on Texas would apply to all states dariomax Mar 2015 #55
This is not a Free Speech Issue nakocal Mar 2015 #52
Wouldn't the result of a win for this case then mean that the states would have to DebJ Mar 2015 #57
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Justices struggle with fr...