Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

Showing Original Post only (View all)

NWCorona

(8,541 posts)
Tue Jun 14, 2016, 12:19 PM Jun 2016

Judge links Clinton aide's immunity to 'criminal investigation' [View all]

Source: Politico

A former information technology aide to Hillary Clinton received immunity from the Justice Department in connection with a criminal investigation, a federal judge confirmed Tuesday.

Bryan Pagliano, a computer expert who worked at the State Department while Clinton was secretary of state and was also paid privately by her, was previously reported to have received immunity in connection with statements he gave to the FBI about Clinton's private server set-up.

However, there had been no explicit confirmation that the investigation—which Clinton has repeatedly referred to as a "security review"—is actually a criminal probe.

In the order, Sullivan declined to make Pagliano's immunity agreement public. The judge ordered the deal be submitted to the court so he could assess Pagliano's plan to assert his Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination during a planned deposition of Pagliano in a Freedom of Information Act lawsuit related to Clinton's emails.

Read more: http://www.politico.com/story/2016/06/hillary-clinton-judge-investigation-224314#ixzz4BZRF3U4r

28 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Let me get settled Lurks Often Jun 2016 #1
"Sullivan declined to make Pagliano's immunity agreement public." - rejecting Judicial Watch's PoliticAverse Jun 2016 #2
And I agree with the judge NWCorona Jun 2016 #3
Now we need to find out is if it's aimed at Hillary cstanleytech Jun 2016 #4
"lawsuit filed by Republicans" You republicans better worry about YOUR great white hope president. Sunlei Jun 2016 #5
So is the Democratic "nominee" headed to the White House..... usaf-vet Jun 2016 #6
There's practically zero chance of Hillary seeing a jail cell. NWCorona Jun 2016 #7
Or that her email was ever hacked. EdwardBernays Jun 2016 #11
If I had to bet I'd say that the server was definitely hacked but that's just my opinion. NWCorona Jun 2016 #14
She thought it was EdwardBernays Jun 2016 #16
Yup! I remember that "what's this zip attachment" email NWCorona Jun 2016 #18
Yep EdwardBernays Jun 2016 #19
I've had a lotus account for years. NWCorona Jun 2016 #20
You've probably EdwardBernays Jun 2016 #21
And if I was I probably wouldn't even know. NWCorona Jun 2016 #22
Not everyone has the same level of interest to hackers. Yo_Mama Jun 2016 #26
Definitely! NWCorona Jun 2016 #27
And THAT.... Plucketeer Jun 2016 #13
I doubt the big house since they haven't announced that she is the aim rather cstanleytech Jun 2016 #8
The fact that Crepuscular Jun 2016 #9
Brian also sought out a deal with the DOJ not the other way around. NWCorona Jun 2016 #10
The take home Crepuscular Jun 2016 #12
It's reasonable to assume that the person who is running the computer equipment isn't the one... PoliticAverse Jun 2016 #17
K & R nt findrskeep Jun 2016 #15
I don't see anything in the article... orwell Jun 2016 #23
It's there. Wilms Jun 2016 #24
by default.. getagrip_already Jun 2016 #25
Thank you. Should have been para. 2 in the OP. leveymg Jun 2016 #28
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Judge links Clinton aide'...