Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: New Liberal PAC Targets Democrats for Primaries [View all]Demsrule86
(68,733 posts)50. Maybo so...
But we also have lost all power ...the GOP has everything...and may end health care this year...with a better outcome in 2009, we might not have been where we are today who knows...I will say this in the short term primarying Lieberman hurt President Obama and ended any chance of Medicare for those over 55. With the GOP, prepared to up the Medicare age to 67 which would cause the deaths of thousands of Americans...that would have really been helpful. I think Lieberman would have lost anyway. We should turn our attention to getting rid of the GOP now...not primarying anyone unless they are completely helping Trump...and in red states it is stupid.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
138 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
I Believe It-They Already Replaced a Democrat with a Republican in the White house
Stallion
Feb 2017
#1
and who do you blame for loss of control of the Senate, House, most governorships and
yurbud
Feb 2017
#16
Binary-thinking ideologues who refuse to vote strategically because 'my purity'
emulatorloo
Feb 2017
#33
isn't the binary thinking on the side of those who think voters only have two choices and have to
yurbud
Feb 2017
#105
that is why someone like Bernie has to come into the Democratic Party to have a chance of winning
yurbud
Feb 2017
#114
you can't control other people's behavior, only your own. the Democratic Party has to ask
yurbud
Feb 2017
#68
this sounds like the Bush defense of torture--"At least we don't behead nobody like Saddam did!"
yurbud
Feb 2017
#115
Clinton did just that by opposing Dictator Putin and thus earned the wrath of oil billionaires
delisen
Mar 2017
#130
it's swinging for right because of Democrats competing to carry corporate water
yurbud
Feb 2017
#123
Carrying corporate water-sloganeering. It's like saying "Make America Great Again"
delisen
Mar 2017
#127
term limits give more power to staffers and lobbyists since they'll be the only ones
yurbud
Feb 2017
#103
This sounds like the beginnings of a trainwreck... that will have many unintended consequences.
NurseJackie
Feb 2017
#2
That's fair, and it never will be if we don't have a unified party, consistently and loudly
JCanete
Feb 2017
#91
if the corporate wing doesn't change their stripes or get out of the way, the GOP will continue to
yurbud
Feb 2017
#67
victory to do WHAT? The problem with DLC/New Democrat way is winning became an end in itself
yurbud
Feb 2017
#72
See this is what I object to...how exactly are Democrats doing a better job fighting?
Demsrule86
Feb 2017
#81
We probably agree on this. Sometimes incrementalism looks a lot like rolling back those gains though
yurbud
Feb 2017
#82
in some areas, like K-12 education Arne Duncan and Dems in Congress pressed the privatization
yurbud
Feb 2017
#83
Third Way, New Democrats...you know something is wrong with a product when you have to keep changing
yurbud
Feb 2017
#99
If you were just concerned about funding campaigns, Bernie and Howard Dean before him should have
yurbud
Feb 2017
#73
Before United, we were taking money. I think we have to be careful about tone though.
JCanete
Feb 2017
#93
Well, I live "next door" in a purple state, so perhaps I have it easy in a way.
lagomorph777
Feb 2017
#107
Wouldn't it be wiser to work to get more Repugnants out of office first since
cstanleytech
Feb 2017
#8
Yes, but nobody ever thinks of anything so simple or practical. It's all about the "purity"...
NurseJackie
Feb 2017
#12
and what was the result...in the end Joe ran and won as an independent and with a score to settle
Demsrule86
Feb 2017
#20
If we did not primary Lieberman he would still be in the Senate poking Dems in the eye today
Larkspur
Feb 2017
#45
wow, I haven't seen a Lieberman apologist on a DEM discussion board in long while.
m-lekktor
Feb 2017
#32
Thanks to our primary of Lieberman in 2006 we now have a good Democrat in his stead
Larkspur
Feb 2017
#49
I am still trying to figure out how so many Bernie voters came to the conclusion that HRC was
StevieM
Feb 2017
#44
HRC did not have a different voting record or different priorities than Barack Obama, Joe Biden or
StevieM
Feb 2017
#55
this is a good move but I am afraid if they pick candidates too far to the left, that won't help us.
nikibatts
Feb 2017
#22
Too far to the left? What does that even mean at this point? So what will ''help us" more DINOs?
YOHABLO
Feb 2017
#28
Yes, as Russ Feingold's and Zephyr Teachout's stunning victories in 2016 have proven
emulatorloo
Feb 2017
#34
It means that no matter what you will never elect a liberal in West Virginia...
Demsrule86
Feb 2017
#41
Why are comments like this acceptable? The post didn't rise to the occasion of a right-wing
JCanete
Feb 2017
#94
in a different post or in this one? Anyway, I appreciate you not abusing the alert function. I never
JCanete
Feb 2017
#100
You seem concerned. Please feel free to air more of your concerns, and enjoy your stay.
msanthrope
Feb 2017
#113
Well, been here since 2003, so if its a standard cordiality at this point, Welcome to DU and
JCanete
Feb 2017
#116
You can count on these folks to snatch defeat from the jaws of victory everytime.
Demsrule86
Feb 2017
#63
Not a good idea. It would be better to go after Republicans in purple states than after
tblue37
Mar 2017
#132