Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

herding cats

(19,564 posts)
24. He may also be facing the Emoluments Clause of the Constitution
Fri Feb 17, 2017, 09:42 PM
Feb 2017
Pentagon: No record Flynn's paid Russian event was allowed

The Pentagon says it has not discovered any evidence former national security adviser Michael Flynn received authorization to accept money for a paid Russian state TV event in 2015.

The Department of the Army conducted “a thorough records search, and has not found any documents,” acting Secretary of the Army Robert Speer said in a Tuesday letter, The Wall Street Journal reported Thursday.

The Journal said Speer’s message was in response to Rep. Elijah Cummings (D-Md.), the ranking member of the House Oversight Committee.


Cummings reportedly asked the Pentagon if Flynn received approval for the event, which occurred in December 2015 during a period of rising tension between the White House and the Kremlin.
Several top Democrats in Congress sent the Department of Defense a letter Feb. 1 asking it to investigate whether Flynn violated the Constitution when he accepted money for the gala.

Flynn accepted an invitation to Moscow in late 2015 to give a paid, sit-down interview with Russian state-funded media outlet RT. RT was conducting a gala for its 10-year anniversary, the Journal said, and Flynn ultimately sat beside Russian President Vladimir Putin.

https://origin-nyi.thehill.com/policy/international/russia/320051-pentagon-no-record-russia-pay-to-flynn-allowed


That's not exactly cheerful news it that regard.
Um, perjury. nt msanthrope Feb 2017 #1
Looks that way. herding cats Feb 2017 #3
Five years seems to be the basic statute of limitations, Hortensis Feb 2017 #23
He may also be facing the Emoluments Clause of the Constitution herding cats Feb 2017 #24
Hard-core cons often seem to have patterns of Hortensis Feb 2017 #25
Keep hammering Raven123 Feb 2017 #2
Trump defended Flynn in his presser as having done nothing wrong. herding cats Feb 2017 #6
So it's not just treason. 3_Limes Feb 2017 #4
So, Comey finally found the zipper Friend or Foe Feb 2017 #5
For lying to the FBI? All together now: JaneQPublic Feb 2017 #7
Hopefully he's going to squeal like a little piggy to try and lessen his sentence. herding cats Feb 2017 #8
Why should he squeal when Trump can simply pardon him to get keep him cstanleytech Feb 2017 #12
That would pretty much force an independent bipartisan investigation. herding cats Feb 2017 #13
That is assuming the Repugnants allow such an investigation to even go forward which I doubt cstanleytech Feb 2017 #15
Whoa! In the call, "he suggested that the Kremlin could expect a reprieve from the sanctions." Native Feb 2017 #9
Yep. herding cats Feb 2017 #10
Had Russia's back? Where did you see that? That's even more explosive. Native Feb 2017 #11
That's my wording. herding cats Feb 2017 #14
Whoa, headed for the big house (I hope) frazzled Feb 2017 #16
I seem to remember THESE TWO LOSERS neurotically and obsessively going over the Clinton FBI TrollBuster9090 Feb 2017 #17
Hillary was held to impossible standards Skittles Feb 2017 #20
Ummm, that right there is a felony folks. CanonRay Feb 2017 #18
Just saw a breaking banner that the FBI is not going to prosecute BumRushDaShow Feb 2017 #19
FBI interviewers deliberately steered him to change his lie to instead claim that he couldn't recall wishstar Feb 2017 #21
I wouldn't be surprised BumRushDaShow Feb 2017 #22
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Flynn in FBI interview de...»Reply #24