Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

Showing Original Post only (View all)

milestogo

(16,829 posts)
Sun Mar 26, 2017, 07:33 PM Mar 2017

After Barring Girls for Leggings, United Airlines Defends Decision [View all]

Source: New York Times

United Airlines barred two women from boarding a flight on Sunday morning and required a child to change into a dress after a gate agent decided the leggings they were wearing were inappropriate. That set off waves of anger on social media, with users criticizing what they called an intrusive, sexist policy, but the airline maintained its support for the gate agent’s decision.

The two women, who were about to board a flight to Minneapolis, were turned away at the gate at Denver International Airport, the company said on Sunday. United doubled down on that decision, defending it in a series of tweets on Sunday.

The incident was first reported on Twitter by Shannon Watts, a passenger at the airport who was waiting to board a flight to Mexico. In a telephone interview from Mexico on Sunday afternoon, Ms. Watts said she noticed two visibly upset teenage girls leaving the gate next to hers. Both were wearing leggings.

Ms. Watts went over to the neighboring gate and saw a “frantic” family with two young girls, one of whom was also wearing leggings, engaged in a tense exchange with a gate agent who told them, “I don’t make the rules, I just enforce them.”

Read more: https://www.nytimes.com/2017/03/26/us/united-airlines-leggings.html



Do terrorists wear leggings?
92 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Well, fuck you, United. Initech Mar 2017 #1
They weren't paying passengers. They were pass travelers flying for free. The company benefit allows KittyWampus Mar 2017 #2
Years ago I when was a nonrev greymattermom Mar 2017 #4
yes, I remember that as well. Merlot Mar 2017 #12
Yeah, that's a pretty important element here. Mike Niendorff Mar 2017 #73
Yeah I flew once on an American "Buddy pass" titaniumsalute Mar 2017 #75
TWA required that for first class. trof Mar 2017 #79
I remember when we did this, my husband wore a suit and I wore a dress LeftInTX Mar 2017 #5
Airlines actually had to relax the dress code from jacket-tie and women's business LuckyLib Mar 2017 #26
Leggings seem to be just the latest version of stretch pants from years back brush Mar 2017 #38
This message was self-deleted by its author tonekat Mar 2017 #43
Why should the standard be higher for "pass travelers"? milestogo Mar 2017 #6
Pass travelers are basically flying for free Merlot Mar 2017 #13
So what if they are flying for free..... LakeArenal Mar 2017 #48
I think the issue is that they're folks that are bascially using synergie Mar 2017 #59
A ten year old girl and teenagers are likely not employees... LakeArenal Mar 2017 #76
really...you have no standards? Demonaut Mar 2017 #67
Still doesn't offset a sexist dress code. NutmegYankee Mar 2017 #10
From the comments above, men are also subject to strict dress codes when flying free 7962 Mar 2017 #17
Come back to me when you find an article of a man being denied because of clothing. nt NutmegYankee Mar 2017 #25
Is their dress code available to be read? EllieBC Mar 2017 #28
The commenters plainly state that men were subject to a strict dress code as well 7962 Mar 2017 #41
To be fair, that seems to be coming from the testimony of the eyewitness synergie Mar 2017 #60
I'd never heard of the free pass either. Always thought "employees only" 7962 Mar 2017 #62
I Know Three Folks Who Fly Free ProfessorGAC Mar 2017 #80
As a male nonrev, I was denied for clothing Vermijelli Mar 2017 #65
Do you think a male employee wearing leggings would have been allowed to board? n/t PoliticAverse Mar 2017 #74
Apparently the kids' father was allowed to board the plane wearing shorts crazycatlady Mar 2017 #64
Are shorts banned as clothing? Article doesnt specify 7962 Mar 2017 #71
If the girls had been wearing shorts would they have been allowed to board? PoliticAverse Mar 2017 #77
Shorts are allowed as long as they're no shorter than 3" above the knee. tammywammy Mar 2017 #84
So the headline is misleading as hell. Should read "stopped for violating the dress code" 7962 Mar 2017 #18
ok . i have no problem with this. JI7 Mar 2017 #30
Ahh, that makes sense. tammywammy Mar 2017 #34
Oh. That makes more sense. Strict, but a dress code is a dress code. Honeycombe8 Mar 2017 #47
i've traveled on passes before crazycatlady Mar 2017 #63
Ahhh, yes. A friend used to fly nonrev to see me, and Ilsa Mar 2017 #89
Evidently employee passes have different dress codes than paid for tickets Freethinker65 Mar 2017 #3
It's that way for most airlines Major Nikon Mar 2017 #8
this just can't be real Motley13 Mar 2017 #7
What's not real is the article - it doesn't state the would be passengers Merlot Mar 2017 #14
Thanks for an informative post. Hortensis Mar 2017 #53
Leggings are undergarments, like slightly heavier pantyhose. marybourg Mar 2017 #40
United was totally within its rights joeybee12 Mar 2017 #9
Only Free for Immediate Family Members HockeyMom Mar 2017 #15
No joeybee12 Mar 2017 #19
Yep. My dad worked for AA and I grew up flying non rev Hassin Bin Sober Mar 2017 #35
I would imagine the dress code serves double duty ToxMarz Mar 2017 #46
I remember the same thing duncang Mar 2017 #69
Perhaps different Airlines HockeyMom Mar 2017 #72
Depends on when you are talking about. Hassin Bin Sober Mar 2017 #87
Even though I had access to family pass from my dad, there were times I paid... Hassin Bin Sober Mar 2017 #49
You know, there are leggings, and then there are tights. Tights alone is just wrong. YOHABLO Mar 2017 #11
This is a way for men to see up the dress and get a thrill. Doreen Mar 2017 #16
They flew on passes, we're not paying cuatomers joeybee12 Mar 2017 #21
Does not matter if they were paying cusomers or not. Doreen Mar 2017 #22
It was leggings, not pants , which if dress pants are dine joeybee12 Mar 2017 #23
Some folks see 'sexism' and 'male perversion' evident in every aspect of daily life ... mr_lebowski Mar 2017 #55
If you changed the word in your post from "disheveled" to 'provocative' it would be understandable. nolabels Mar 2017 #68
when you fly on a pass you agree to certain rules rdking647 Mar 2017 #78
Does United Still Break Guitars too? mackdaddy Mar 2017 #20
Just another reason larry budwell Mar 2017 #24
Unequal treatment cagefreesoylentgreen Mar 2017 #27
I agree it is discrimination and WRONG, even if they were flying free. My opinion. iluvtennis Mar 2017 #51
Being a paying customer does have advantages. ManiacJoe Mar 2017 #91
Kick for exposure red dog 1 Mar 2017 #29
I fucking hate it when people compare something like this to Nazi Germany!!! nini Mar 2017 #31
Well, you are entitled to your opinion, and I am entitled to mine. red dog 1 Mar 2017 #33
yes it DOES diminish it . it's insulting to compare it to nazi germany JI7 Mar 2017 #50
Seems a ridiculous and offensive comparison to me! Yo_Mama Mar 2017 #57
Exactly right. chwaliszewski Mar 2017 #52
They were basically flying for free LeftInTX Mar 2017 #45
their dress code policy is stupid MountainFool Mar 2017 #32
My guess is that the 'purpose' is not just 'other passengers on the flight' ... mr_lebowski Mar 2017 #54
I was a flight attendant (stewardess, in those days) for United in the 50s---never heard of Doitnow Mar 2017 #36
Probably didn't need one then. tazkcmo Mar 2017 #39
Because people actually wore decent clothing then. Codeine Mar 2017 #82
I remember the first time I flew from Mobile, Al to Atlanta. Grammy23 Mar 2017 #86
The sad thing is that this bad publicity will blow back on the pass riders mn9driver Mar 2017 #37
Subservience Langkous Mar 2017 #42
Really??? Langkous Mar 2017 #44
Aren't there more important things to be discussing? YOHABLO Mar 2017 #56
Link to The Guardian nitpicker Mar 2017 #58
This reminds me of the early Seventies when women couldn't wear pants to eat in no_hypocrisy Mar 2017 #61
WTF, they are employees kids and represent the company Demonaut Mar 2017 #66
Maybe they should just pay for their ticket. That way they can wear whatever they want! Dream Girl Mar 2017 #85
United! Discriminate against me! I'll take the free passes! TexasMommaWithAHat Mar 2017 #70
If my family members were flying free because I worked for the airline crim son Mar 2017 #81
I remember wearing a suit to travel in an empty DC-8 that wasn't even departing from the terminal Sen. Walter Sobchak Mar 2017 #83
Fake news meant to generate outrage. Oneironaut Mar 2017 #88
Seems to me they are lucky to all get to fly together nonrev. Ilsa Mar 2017 #90
oh dear, to fly for free you must abide by employee rules Skittles Mar 2017 #92
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»After Barring Girls for L...