Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

karynnj

(59,507 posts)

25. The problem is the reporter is not very good

Reply to Fantastic Anarchist (Reply #15)

Tue Sep 10, 2013, 06:23 PM

Sep 2013

Last edited Tue Sep 10, 2013, 11:56 PM - Edit history (1)

Kerry was NOT at that point speaking of what is needed for the US to avert a strike. (He answered that earlier - and it was all related to the chemical weapons. It was a final question asked about what he would wish to say to their FM. He answered first that he hoped they would deal with the Chemical weapons. He then said, that he hoped they would take the path then toward the Geneva 2 peace talks (the talks that Lavrov and Kerry have been pushing for) to get to peace.

Here is a video link - https://plus.google.com/u/0/events/crns7bqaccuvuehb44vdsrsmp8o The statement in question was the last question.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

27 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Kerry: Syria Should Do More Than Declare Weapons [View all] Bosonic Sep 2013 OP

Yeah, the terrorists aren't interested in "dialogue," they will only accept unconditional surrender. David__77 Sep 2013 #1

Wouldn't that be wonderful to have all Iliyah Sep 2013 #2

More conditions eh? avaistheone1 Sep 2013 #3

Are you new at this? sharp_stick Sep 2013 #4

Why are you being snarky? Fantastic Anarchist Sep 2013 #15

Not really sharp_stick Sep 2013 #17

The problem is the reporter is not very good karynnj Sep 2013 #25

Good question. arewenotdemo Sep 2013 #7

go ahead and provide documentation for that conspiracy theory pasto76 Sep 2013 #20

I imagine that Obama didn't take down Qaddafi's regime, either. arewenotdemo Sep 2013 #27

Nothing more, just the original conditions being reiterated... Turborama Sep 2013 #18

No stupid reporter karynnj Sep 2013 #24

Either the Syrian regime enters into a genuine dialogue with the nearly defeated rebels . . . another_liberal Sep 2013 #5

What a nag. (no text) Quantess Sep 2013 #6

This is the worry, they will increase demands until they claim to have no options but to bomb. grahamhgreen Sep 2013 #8

At this point and time it looks that way. avaistheone1 Sep 2013 #9

That wouldn't surprise me. arewenotdemo Sep 2013 #10

Its the insurgents who have rejected dialogue dipsydoodle Sep 2013 #11

We expect Assad should agree to surrender . . . another_liberal Sep 2013 #14

This is called "moving the goalposts." last1standing Sep 2013 #12

Well said. another_liberal Sep 2013 #13

I swear to God, Kerry won't be happy until he gets HIS war. arewenotdemo Sep 2013 #21

No he isn't - this reporter is awful and likely didn't bother to watch karynnj Sep 2013 #26

Oh good, I was wondering how long until the goals were moved back again Alamuti Lotus Sep 2013 #16

They weren't moved - I watched it and that was NOT a condition to avoid the strike. karynnj Sep 2013 #23

a genuine dialogue with the opposition MyNameGoesHere Sep 2013 #19

I watched the google hang out and this is not really correct karynnj Sep 2013 #22