Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: George Zimmerman not expected to face civil rights charges in Trayvon Martin death [View all]branford
(4,462 posts)Last edited Sat Oct 4, 2014, 04:40 AM - Edit history (1)
What you relish is not justice, it is the blood-lust of the mob. Far worse, to many, such sentiments ultimately vindicate Zimmerman's alleged racism and paranoia.
Is it therefore justified to harass and frighten anyone who's been acquitted at trial, or only Zimmerman and those whom you disapprove?
Do Zimmerman's purported "apologists" consist of anyone who believes in the presumption of innocence, the requirement that the State must prove guilt beyond a reasonable doubt, or the sanctity of a jury verdict? Do you seek to change the fundamentals of Western jurisprudence?
Are you the arbiter of what constitutes "justice?" What are your qualifications?
If some impressionable, ignorant or self-righteous fool attempts to hurt Zimmerman and ends up dead, seriously injured or ruining his or her life in prison, no less by Zimmerman lawfully defending himself with a firearm, do you believe that you and those like you may bear any responsibility for encouraging or excusing such behavior?
I'm not a fan of Zimmerman, but no matter his malfeasance and any perceived injustice, my liberal principles and common decency will remain unchanged.