Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Editorials & Other Articles
In reply to the discussion: by Robert Reich 'The New York Times no longer reports all the news that's fit to print [View all]TM99
(8,352 posts)27. Call it what it is...Pravda.
It is just propaganda. We don't do real journalism anymore. It is infotainment for a consumer driven and ignorant culture who wouldn't normally notice and article change if it bit them in the ass. Frankly most wouldn't care either that it was changed.
WaPo and NYT's want Clinton to win. It is apparent to all to see. They really don't even give a shit any more if a few of us figure this out and try to call them on it.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
39 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
by Robert Reich 'The New York Times no longer reports all the news that's fit to print [View all]
elleng
Mar 2016
OP
Is he an American citizen? I thought he was Mexican. What is he doing interfering in our elections
JDPriestly
Mar 2016
#32
I use newspapers to clean my windows. Other than that???? I only read the very local, local ones.
JDPriestly
Mar 2016
#33
Robert Reich was all but fired by President Clinton, and he's been an anti-Clintonite.....
George II
Mar 2016
#14
I still remember eferrari catching a newspaper in the middle of altering an article
suffragette
Mar 2016
#19
WAPO switched from Democratic to Republican ownership. Nothing else need be said.
merrily
Mar 2016
#38