Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Editorials & Other Articles
Showing Original Post only (View all)Obama: Too busy to help Wisconsin Democrats in recall election [View all]
http://news.yahoo.com/blogs/ticket/obama-too-busy-help-wisconsin-democrats-223240389.html
President Barack Obama explained in a radio interview Monday why he didn't do more to help Wisconsin Democrats in their battle to recall Republican Governor Scott Walker: He was too busy.
"The truth of the matter is that, as president of the United States, I've got a lot of responsibilities," he told WBAY of Green Bay, Wisconsin. WBAY was one of eight TV stations given an exclusive interview with the president six from battleground states Colorado, Florida, Iowa, Nevada, Virginia and Wisconsin and two from California and South Carolina.
Obama said he was "supportive" of Walker's Democratic challenger, Tom Barrett, whom Walker thumped in last week's vote. "Obviously, I would have loved to see a different result," Obama told WBAY.
And the president said he would be working to ensure a different result in November.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
37 replies, 5152 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (5)
ReplyReply to this post
37 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
good point on Ohio, but I have to wonder without the 7 to 1 spending advantage what the outcome
Bill USA
Jun 2012
#9
You know, that kind of shit is just exactly what turns Democrats off on being a Democrats.
patrice
Jun 2012
#7
Falk announces in January. Barret announces in March. WHAT WAS HE WAITING ON? nt
patrice
Jun 2012
#12
Right on! BTW, have we heard from Feingold about this yet? It may be best for him to keep his cards
patrice
Jun 2012
#32
He was in Illinois and Minnesota on the weekend prior to the recall election.
postulater
Jun 2012
#5
So, you think he should have gone in there and supported a candidate that FRACTURED Labor????
patrice
Jun 2012
#8
Yes, I do. I think he should have supported the movement of people who pushed against Walker
postulater
Jun 2012
#17
Would it matter to you that one candidate may have been backed by Citizens' United money
patrice
Jun 2012
#25
All of this pretty much reveals that the definition of "they" (in your first sentence) is not clear.
patrice
Jun 2012
#28
There was a split between the teachers, unionists, & progressives and the Barrett backers.
patrice
Jun 2012
#16
Without campaign finance transparency we will never who got used more than whom else and by
patrice
Jun 2012
#26
By how much did Barrett out-raise Falk??? Was it Citizens' United money? or DLC-WI? nt
patrice
Jun 2012
#11
You mean HuffHo the magic pony-fairy for "the Left"-for-hire??? How many people do you know who
patrice
Jun 2012
#27
I'm glad he didn't waste his time. They ran the same candidate who was beaten previously
The Stranger
Jun 2012
#22