Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Divernan

(15,480 posts)
17. A level of exploitative greed almost impossible to grasp
Wed Oct 7, 2015, 08:33 AM
Oct 2015

Last edited Wed Oct 7, 2015, 09:12 AM - Edit history (1)

Exploiting human suffering and tragedy to finance their boutique, pardon-the-expression, "charity" and their One Percent life style.

Read the whole link: http://www.nytimes.com/2015/05/30/us/politics/an-award-for-bill-clinton-came-with-500000-for-his-foundation.html?_r=0
to get a detailed, stomach-turning accounting of how the Clinton Family Foundation blatantly operates as a (totally unnecessary) middle man to skim off money.

“The Clinton Foundation had rejected the Happy Hearts Fund invitation more than once, until there was a thinly veiled solicitation and then the offer of an ($500,000) honorarium.” She booked Cipriani 42nd Street, which greeted guests with Bellini cocktails on silver trays. She flew in Sheryl Crow with her band and crew for a 20-minute set. She special-ordered heart-shaped floral centerpieces, heart-shaped chocolate parfaits, heart-shaped tiramisù and, because orange is the charity’s color, an orange carpet rather than a red one. She imported a Swiss auctioneer and handed out orange rulers to serve as auction paddles, playfully threatening to use hers to spank the highest bidder for an Ibiza vacation. The gala cost $363,413. But the real splurge? Bill Clinton.

The former president of the United States agreed to accept a lifetime achievement award at the June 2014 event after Ms. Nemcova offered a $500,000 contribution to the Bill, Hillary and Chelsea Clinton Foundation. The donation, made late last year after the foundation sent the charity an invoice, amounted to almost a quarter of the evening’s net proceeds — enough to build 10 preschools in Indonesia.


Happy Hearts collaborated more expeditiously in Haiti with the Digicel Foundation, whose founder, the Irish billionaire Denis O’Brien, is a multimillion-dollar supporter of the Clinton Foundation and whose parent telecommunications company benefited from grants from Mrs. Clinton’s State Department.

Digicel also made a commitment at the 2011 meeting to build schools; it was a formality, though, as Digicel had already taken the lead in Haiti in that realm. It has built 150 schools there over the past seven years; Happy Hearts has built seven, six of them joint or side-by-side ventures with Digicel.

One of those schools, operated by the Haitian group Prodev, was featured in the Clinton Foundation’s most recent annual report as “built through a Clinton Global Initiative Commitment to Action.” The Clinton Foundation’s sole direct contribution to the school was a grant for an Earth Day celebration and tree-planting activity.

Outside Cipriani, protesters, mostly Haitian-Americans frustrated with the earthquake reconstruction effort, stood behind barricades holding signs. “Clinton, where is the money?” they chanted. “In whose pockets?”

Notice that he says it as if people are wrong about the rich. Spitfire of ATJ Oct 2015 #1
Silly poor people deutsey Oct 2015 #9
is Bill having some voice/speaking issues? At beginning, sounded slurred a bit tomm2thumbs Oct 2015 #2
I noticed some issue with his speech as well. Old Crow Oct 2015 #3
In reality, we've seen the graphics that show Bill is completely wrong there. Erich Bloodaxe BSN Oct 2015 #16
He looks great, and the point about Trump is accurate. MADem Oct 2015 #4
The human mind can rationalize just about anything. highprincipleswork Oct 2015 #5
+1 deutsey Oct 2015 #8
Actually, Bill is right. Bill has no need to rationalize anything. He tells it like it is. leftofcool Oct 2015 #11
Yeah, I know, everyone is delusional that the income disparity is what it is highprincipleswork Oct 2015 #33
"People THINK!?!?! the system's rigged against us & the rich get all the gain ?!?!?! " Divernan Oct 2015 #6
What a world class tangled web of quid pro quos the Clintons have woven. Divernan Oct 2015 #7
"rigged against US"? He actually said rigged against US? tularetom Oct 2015 #26
Good catch! Mr. $70 million in 10 years still claiming to be poor? Divernan Oct 2015 #29
Mainstream political parties have become self-serving corporations who serve other corporations whereisjustice Oct 2015 #10
Yea, those poor African villages served by the CGI are so rich and privileged leftofcool Oct 2015 #12
An Award for Bill Clinton Came With $500,000 for His Foundation whereisjustice Oct 2015 #13
A level of exploitative greed almost impossible to grasp Divernan Oct 2015 #17
Sadly,so little money trickles through the Clintons down to deserving poor! Divernan Oct 2015 #18
Exactly what does their foundation claim to be doing for the jwirr Oct 2015 #20
You need a flow chart to follow all the actions & interactions. Divernan Oct 2015 #27
Just exactly what I would expect from a Clinton. All the people jwirr Oct 2015 #28
I'm a Bernie guy but I give Bill some slack. Stevepol Oct 2015 #14
The "mistakes" Bill made; Glass Steagall, NAFTA , Telecommunications Act, etc raindaddy Oct 2015 #22
Not really. There is an almost straight trend line on income inequality going back to the late 1960s stevenleser Oct 2015 #30
Never said he was completely to blame.. raindaddy Oct 2015 #31
He's not to blame at all. These charts prove it. Wages for the 99% did better under Clinton than stevenleser Oct 2015 #32
Your charts prove nada..Because the harm Bill Clinton did didn't occur untill he was out of office.. raindaddy Oct 2015 #34
They do prove it. It is you who has proved nothing. You have provided no backup for your claims at stevenleser Oct 2015 #35
How do your charts asses the future outcome of Clinton's Presidency? raindaddy Oct 2015 #36
I can tell you why without even watching the video. Erich Bloodaxe BSN Oct 2015 #15
Sounds more like a Rockefeller Republican than a Democrat.. raindaddy Oct 2015 #19
Not sad for him, he got what he was after from the first time he ran for office tularetom Oct 2015 #24
If this is the great unveiling of the other half of the Clinton brand, I hope we see more of it. raindaddy Oct 2015 #25
I think... quickesst Oct 2015 #21
He looks like hell. Colbert on the other hand. azmom Oct 2015 #23
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Video & Multimedia»Colbert: Bill Clinton Exp...»Reply #17