Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Video & Multimedia
Showing Original Post only (View all)If Clinton Is So Sure She Will Win, Why Does She Need To Mislead Us About The Popular Vote? [View all]
Since the story from New York Daily News writer Shaun King came out on Thursday, there has been a big hullabaloo about what a difference adding the caucus results into the popular vote would make. Estimates have been made by the Washington Post and others, and they consistently show that it is indeed true that Clintons 3 million number is a misrepresentation of the true will of the people.
If Clinton is so sure that she will be the nominee, why then, does she continue to lie to the people? Ring of Fires Sydney Robinson discusses this.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
136 replies, 11331 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (95)
ReplyReply to this post
136 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
If Clinton Is So Sure She Will Win, Why Does She Need To Mislead Us About The Popular Vote? [View all]
GoLeft TV
May 2016
OP
Quit attacking Hillary: Sanders has lost: Hillary knows she will fight for every vote
lewebley3
May 2016
#59
Pointing out her lies isn't attacking. They didn't have WMD in Iraq, hello!! Not an attack.
rhett o rick
May 2016
#110
When she lied about the WMD in Iraq they cheered. They like her. She agrees with
rhett o rick
May 2016
#127
Hillary is very honest person: she has to be everything she does or says is examined
lewebley3
May 2016
#128
Then explain why she lied to the Senate about WMD in Iraq. Her speech was almost
rhett o rick
May 2016
#129
The Daily News is owned by Ruppert Murdoch. No different than FOX. P.S., Sanders still lost. The End
Trust Buster
May 2016
#2
Ruppert Murdoch is not objective by definition. He wishes to sow the seeds of division on the Left.
Trust Buster
May 2016
#8
Sanders has won a victory one way or other. He has exposed the corrupt culture that
rhett o rick
May 2016
#112
There is no division on the Left. The division in the Democratic Party is between the Left
rhett o rick
May 2016
#111
It was Sanders himself who had poor or NO answers to the interview he gave with NYDN. Sanders owned
riversedge
May 2016
#76
I see you don't understand what a representative government stands for. n/t
A Simple Game
May 2016
#13
For the same reason Trump is always bragging about his crowd and (ahem) hand size
corkhead
May 2016
#7
Trust me, that was twelve tons of sarcasm. A comment on the apparent ironclad inability of
Gene Debs
May 2016
#18
Hillary is a politician: she is not applying for St.hood: She will work with her party
lewebley3
May 2016
#64
She is quoting the record. Yes, Hillary will win. Bernie has no rational chance.
Sancho
May 2016
#16
Hillary's big numerical lead is due to her having won in Southern states, many of which
JDPriestly
May 2016
#21
Sanders has proven he doesn't have leadership qualities: his people are bullies
lewebley3
May 2016
#67
On the evidence she has repeatedly and about substantial issues. In this case the numbers.
Ford_Prefect
May 2016
#72
Hillary is not the only one that is certain: anyone with math skills knows Hillary has
lewebley3
May 2016
#69
Hillary never feels threatened she is a fighter: She will take on the Trump the bully
lewebley3
May 2016
#74
No it call math: we all arrived at same numbers: Sanders has lost: and without grace
lewebley3
May 2016
#86
democratic socialist (a very mild one at that) and a progressive who would beat Trump
AntiBank
May 2016
#89
yes, Clinton and her corporate masters want to smash, once and for all, any progressive
AntiBank
May 2016
#66
that qualifies as one of the most LUDICROUS statements I have ever seen on this board
AntiBank
May 2016
#75
110+ million USD...How Hillary and Bill Clinton Parlayed Decades of Public Service into Vast Wealth
AntiBank
May 2016
#79
She is up over 3 million votes over Bernie...she needs 92 more delegates...
beachbumbob
May 2016
#56
She's telling the truth. Even Sanders admits it. He says over and ove that he has received
lunamagica
May 2016
#99
She is not the one misleadingshe is up by three million votes, this is a fact.
Thinkingabout
May 2016
#102
Just might be compulsive since that seems to be what she does even when the truth serves better
emsimon33
May 2016
#118