Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Gun Control & RKBA
In reply to the discussion: Would publishing the personal information... [View all]bongbong
(5,436 posts)112. Yawn part 543,638
Your self-proclamations are worthless. If you really believe in them, are you ready for me to operate on your brain tumor? I am the GREATEST brain surgeon in history!
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
178 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
You wanna talk about something O'Reilly said, why don't you say it instead of O'Liely
rl6214
Apr 2012
#55
That's a good point. If the public has a right to know who is carrying guns, why not carry openly?
Atypical Liberal
Apr 2012
#4
an Individual is a Member of the Militia. In order to be well regulated the Individual must have a
Tuesday Afternoon
Apr 2012
#11
OK but, does this mean that one is not well regulated if one can not produce papers from a
Tuesday Afternoon
Apr 2012
#44
that needs to be further discussed and refined, imo.... still, did you forget to produce your
Tuesday Afternoon
Apr 2012
#47
No, it's commonly accepted that the foot soldier carries the modern weapon of THE FOOT SOLDIER
rl6214
Apr 2012
#107
Even if the second amendment specifically said you had to be in a militia to keep and bear arms...
Atypical Liberal
Apr 2012
#78
love it, sitting on my porch, sipping on a mint julep and listening to:
Tuesday Afternoon
Apr 2012
#165
There are no militias that serve the role that they did in the founders' day.
Atypical Liberal
Apr 2012
#87
It's a problem for anyone who wants to restrict the right to keep and bear arms.
Atypical Liberal
Apr 2012
#129
"Per your post, if the militia no longer exists, then the 2nd Amendment has NO meaning anymore. "
Atypical Liberal
Apr 2012
#145
"Communicating badly and acting smug when you're misunderstood is NOT CLEVERNESS."- XKCD
friendly_iconoclast
Apr 2012
#169
I wasn't aware you were advocating *anything*, (that 'communicating badly' thing)...
friendly_iconoclast
Apr 2012
#171
OK, then. Kindly point out for us what the NRA got wrong. Here's a link to their site:
friendly_iconoclast
Apr 2012
#174
Well then, what you have asserted without evidence can be likewise dismissed without evidence.
friendly_iconoclast
Apr 2012
#177
All 9 judges agreed the right to keep and bear arms is an individual right.
Atypical Liberal
Apr 2012
#77
"Area Man Passionate Defender Of What He Imagines Constitution To Be"
friendly_iconoclast
Apr 2012
#166
And what do *you* believe "...The NRA Imagines Constitution To Be"?
friendly_iconoclast
Apr 2012
#168