2016 Postmortem

Seeinghope

(786 posts) Sun May 29, 2016, 12:22 AM May 2016

The personal server at her home could have been exclusively used for personal emails, Right? [View all]

She could have used the SD system for business. 2 different systems. She has assistants. She isn't out there doing everything by herself. Her blackberry could have been for her personal use. She could have had another blackberry in sync with the SD for government. If she was so ignorant with computers an assistant or two could have been arranged, after all she managed to find someone to help her with her personal server at home, right?

95 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

The personal server at her home could have been exclusively used for personal emails, Right? [View all] Seeinghope May 2016 OP

There were two systems. yallerdawg May 2016 #1

And information from the classified system ended up on her server Press Virginia May 2016 #3

No. yallerdawg May 2016 #22

She didn't have SD e-mail so how did she get Press Virginia May 2016 #26

Archived material always goes through multi-agency review before public release. yallerdawg May 2016 #30

Not according to the IC IG. The information he found was classifed at the time Press Virginia May 2016 #31

Shouldn't this be in 'creative speculation'? yallerdawg May 2016 #35

Speculation? It was a report to a congressional committee complete with sworn Press Virginia May 2016 #37

Pure speculation. yallerdawg May 2016 #39

I refer you to the standard NDA, signed by HRC, which explicitly states Press Virginia May 2016 #40

You are talking about the Secretary of State! yallerdawg May 2016 #45

That's within the SD. IC and DOD sourced information Press Virginia May 2016 #47

Pay no attention to Dianne Feinstein as I linked you. yallerdawg May 2016 #59

irrelevant. HRC is supposed to be able to recognize classified or potentially classified information Press Virginia May 2016 #64

I guess the argument can only go so far... MrMickeysMom May 2016 #74

Lampert's analysis omits mention of the applicable statute, Sec. 793. Talks only about 798, 1924 leveymg May 2016 #82

It doesn't have to include markings... mymomwasright May 2016 #77

Wow, how many times does this have to be explained...this is not new! Sancho May 2016 #65

what was HRC sending and receiving these secure emails from while in the SCIF Press Virginia May 2016 #68

No it's not...all this has been reported before. Sancho May 2016 #71

Wow! It's like you haven't read any part of the IG report Press Virginia May 2016 #83

The IG report is more detailed, and has almost nothing new... Sancho May 2016 #85

Must be why Hillary's story changed about her server being approved Press Virginia May 2016 #87

It was approved to use private email. Sancho May 2016 #88

Not a private server. Furthermore she was warned against using private email Press Virginia May 2016 #89

Yawn...here's how Newsweek describes it (again) based on the IG report and letters.... Sancho May 2016 #91

Nope...entirely consistent... Sancho May 2016 #84

Bahahahahaha! Why are Obama and John Kerry unleashing these Press Virginia May 2016 #86

She didn't have a SD email account, so please explain? Barack_America May 2016 #6

It is very simple. yallerdawg May 2016 #43

Hillary didn't have SD e-mail so she couldn't have Press Virginia May 2016 #48

This isn't HER State Department email system per se. yallerdawg May 2016 #52

The woman who didn't know how to work e-mail on a computer Press Virginia May 2016 #57

You're just punkin' me now. yallerdawg May 2016 #60

Nope just going by what's been reported Press Virginia May 2016 #67

Do you really struggle to keep yourself this uninformed? BillZBubb May 2016 #7

At least he's not claiming, as someone else did, that the IC IG is Press Virginia May 2016 #12

Jaw drop. grasswire May 2016 #18

You're saying she had a classified server in her house? neverforget May 2016 #24

He doesn't know what he's talking about Press Virginia May 2016 #27

Testimony before Benghazi Committee. yallerdawg May 2016 #28

A secure phone is not the same as secure email. CJCRANE May 2016 #42

I think one needs to have seen this: snot May 2016 #33

This is ALL rightwing sourced. yallerdawg May 2016 #38

Thanks, if true. So, are the sources correct, or not? If not, pls source, thanks. snot May 2016 #44

Daily Caller? Tucker Carlson? yallerdawg May 2016 #46

It has been verified many times. 840high May 2016 #49

.....and the clintons are paying all the legal bills for cliffordu May 2016 #53

No: she ran EVERYTHING through her cliffordu May 2016 #36

Except classified material. yallerdawg May 2016 #54

You really should read the Clinton email timeline cliffordu May 2016 #56

Thanks yallerdawg for trying...amazing how many years this has been explained.. Sancho May 2016 #66

The OIG Report doesn't deal with classified information violations. The FBI and IC IG reports will. leveymg May 2016 #79

Hillary broke DOS regulations with her private system and committed a felony by using it to trade leveymg May 2016 #63

The loss of that classified information cliffordu May 2016 #92

It was like waving a flag and shouting, "Here it is, come and get it." Very strange. leveymg May 2016 #93

I thought that too- a honeypot for finding cliffordu May 2016 #94

That about sums up why she must never be allowed anywhere near the Oval Office or the football. leveymg May 2016 #95

Exactly. She rejected a SD issued blackberry which could have handled both Press Virginia May 2016 #2

Emails show NSA rejected Hillary Clinton's request for secure smartphone BlueStateLib May 2016 #16

Yeah but she was told the SD would provide her a blackberry for work Press Virginia May 2016 #17

They knew what they were doing RobertEarl May 2016 #4

I think there is an element of truth to this. Certainly Foundation business. BillZBubb May 2016 #9

Why else do so? RobertEarl May 2016 #13

Absolutely. 840high May 2016 #50

Yes, I think this was a big part of it. nt. polly7 May 2016 #73

A private server means private business. Octafish May 2016 #14

Can you believe it? RobertEarl May 2016 #15

private server means Foundation, IMO. grasswire May 2016 #20

Some critics think she was selling SD secrets to Foundation donors. grasswire May 2016 #19

Information is everything RobertEarl May 2016 #21

Heh. Reaching. And contrary to already known facts. JackRiddler May 2016 #5

He was talking about her using SD email for work instead of co-mingling Press Virginia May 2016 #8

yes to all your questions. notadmblnd May 2016 #10

personal means "Clinton Foundation" grasswire May 2016 #23

Yes, the slush fund that appears to masquerade as a charity notadmblnd May 2016 #34

.that^ 840high May 2016 #51

That wouldn't have been "convenient" according to HRC k8conant May 2016 #11

But she didn't use the State Department system at all. SheilaT May 2016 #25

Wow, you are really ignoring the facts. yallerdawg May 2016 #32

She established a server in her own home, outside the State Department. With, it's quite clear, SheilaT May 2016 #41

That's completely wrong.... Sancho May 2016 #69

^^^^^^^^^^^ Amen! ^^^^^^^^^^^ pdsimdars May 2016 #76

IMO, the intermingling, also inappropriate, was planned from the off. merrily May 2016 #29

By 2003 professional employees in big companies and firms were careful not to mix business JDPriestly May 2016 #55

The OIG report clearly states... yallerdawg May 2016 #58

She mixed personal and work-related e-mails in one account. JDPriestly May 2016 #61

maybe you can provide a link to prove your assertions, then. grasswire May 2016 #62

Many companies have policies about not mixing the two. SheilaT May 2016 #90

Mrs. Clinton has been in politics for decades, she knows the rules, right! akbacchus_BC May 2016 #70

and she knows she will be attack any time whistler162 May 2016 #78

Yes. Like all of the other people who work, she could have used IdaBriggs May 2016 #72

It wasn't ignorance, they TOLD her a few times what she could and could not do and she ignored it pdsimdars May 2016 #75

Well, that and Minesweeper! Lizzie Poppet May 2016 #80

Of course it could have. 99Forever May 2016 #81