Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
In reply to the discussion: The discussion we should be having is is about Sid. [View all]Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)36. Not just that. Rec'cing threads for "pissing off the right people"
It's hard work!
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
103 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
I was like "Dayyyyymmmmm , $120k per year for ROFL wrangling? I'm in the wrong business"
Hassin Bin Sober
May 2016
#23
Yes indeed. And why would a Sec of State encourage seeking leaks from the CIA??
HereSince1628
May 2016
#14
Actually, we should be discussing issues that actually matter, like the environment,
YouDig
May 2016
#20
How beautiful. I am humbled in admiration. I try to have the lightest footprint I can but you are
JudyM
May 2016
#56
Obviously Hillary doesn't want to talk about issues since shes hiding form a debate?
bahrbearian
May 2016
#27
""Wish in one hand, crap in the other. See which one gets filled first."
DemocratSinceBirth
May 2016
#49
You used that line already.. I am sure a smart lad like yourself can up with something new.
DemocratSinceBirth
May 2016
#51
I guess the "advice and information" between the two of them was "just talking"
Seeinghope
May 2016
#100
He could not be put on the State Dept. payroll since he had been banned so he was put on the
Samantha
May 2016
#72
The discussion the Republican will be having in Congress and the Senate
Ichingcarpenter
May 2016
#99