Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
In reply to the discussion: Clinton lawyer to FBI: Clinton is under NO legal obligation to give interview. [View all]saltpoint
(50,986 posts)86. Folks, we could be at the beginning
moments of another Patti Hearst-like episode, only this time with Hillary on the lam.
They'll eventually find her hunkered down in a WalMart distribution center in north Arkansas, bedraggled and incoherent.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
185 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Clinton lawyer to FBI: Clinton is under NO legal obligation to give interview. [View all]
kcjohn1
May 2016
OP
Kind of you to point this out - but needless as the FBI has no reason to question Sanders nt
LiberalElite
May 2016
#123
Of course she's not going to do an interview. The way she lies she'll talk herself
Press Virginia
May 2016
#2
Watching the Real time evolution of the spin has been entertaining to say the least.
NWCorona
May 2016
#79
certainly explains the lack of press conferences and venues where the questions
Press Virginia
May 2016
#82
You mean all the phone interviews? I think she's scared to show her face while lying - it's too
DebDoo
May 2016
#92
I love the phone interviews. It's like a neon sign reading, "I'm desperate!" n/t
winter is coming
May 2016
#117
They must know someone talked or the FBI has some emails they hoped were lost.
BillZBubb
May 2016
#8
Or they assume someone talked or the FBI found something. They don't know for
Press Virginia
May 2016
#10
What is this, Moscow? Just let the IC IG kick the door open and follow up with a candid FBI
leveymg
May 2016
#100
I think this mean she's finished and she knows it. If she doesn't talk, she's trying to cop a plea.
Bob41213
May 2016
#120
Pagliano got immunity. Guccifer got a plea bargain. Some of the "lost"
winter is coming
May 2016
#65
Yeah, and Obama probably just called her and said he can't protect her any longer....
Bob41213
May 2016
#125
A federal judge just ruled that Trump has been improperly trying to conceal documents
Tal Vez
May 2016
#7
That's the latest Brock spin. Not gonna work. And no the trump and Clinton problems are not equal.
BillZBubb
May 2016
#17
If you think that Clinton's mistakes are "far more serious" than Trump's mistakes,
Tal Vez
May 2016
#32
You're probably right. It's not like national security is an issue in these elections anyway.
frylock
May 2016
#58
Her duty was much higher as a public official in her position. Plus the worst they'd probably get
JudyM
May 2016
#49
Shuster still has a bug up his ass for losing his MSNBC job when he called Chelsea Clinton a whore.
DemocratSinceBirth
May 2016
#14
I think that is the case for everyone. They invite you and you can refuse. That's the way it is
pdsimdars
Jun 2016
#173
Ahh, but she only agreed to cooperate with the "security review" - she's not going anywhere near the
DebDoo
May 2016
#95
Right to not criminally incriminate ones self is probably not the angle you want here.
morningfog
May 2016
#87
When a lawyer says his client is cooperating completely voluntarily, that's exactly
geek tragedy
May 2016
#121
Indeed -- anyone who worked for a failed network has no business doing reporting
JonLeibowitz
Jun 2016
#136
No. He was suspended for interviewing with CNN when his contract was running out. n/t
winter is coming
May 2016
#41
"I think last August I made it clear I'm more than ready to talk to anybody anytime"
kcjohn1
May 2016
#43
LOL Sooo.. is Hillary just going to hide from the FBI now? That makes sense.........................
Joob
May 2016
#50
This would lead me to believe that they've called her for an interview, and she's stonewalled them.
frylock
May 2016
#51
I was wondering what was going on. They were supposedly going to interview her in May
pdsimdars
Jun 2016
#174
This public leak could well be staged to make her look "good" when she assents to the interview.
JudyM
May 2016
#59
Or this leak could be to make her look bad for saying crap like "no one has contacted me yet"
Bob41213
Jun 2016
#148
In a court of law yes, but this is something we can use to decide if she should be nominated...
Bob41213
Jun 2016
#145
Well apparently her lawyers know it's over for her even her supporters don't...
Bob41213
May 2016
#119
Comey is a Republican. He's not going to care what spin she wants to put on it.
EndElectoral
May 2016
#124