2016 Postmortem

ljm2002

(10,751 posts)

23. Y'all can go ahead and be sore winners in the primary...

Reply to tonyt53 (Reply #1)

Wed Jun 8, 2016, 12:33 PM

Jun 2016

...then see how well your candidate does in the general.

Good luck with that.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

49 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

This really sums it up [View all] amborin Jun 2016 OP

Yep, we did. We got rid of the sore losers. tonyt53 Jun 2016 #1

Pretty impressive response. peace13 Jun 2016 #4

Leaving you with a MAXIMUM 29% share of the electorate. dchill Jun 2016 #6

Only if you don't understand who independents are. TwilightZone Jun 2016 #9

Everybody is a fraction of the total. dchill Jun 2016 #13

In states with those open primaries, they registered as indies. CA showed the influence of Bernie tonyt53 Jun 2016 #28

CA showed the influence of the AP. dchill Jun 2016 #38

What about the influence of Jerry Brown? George Eliot Jun 2016 #49

that dem number includes progressives, thanks to Bernie, so dont include those larkrake Jun 2016 #39

The real question is lapfog_1 Jun 2016 #19

Y'all can go ahead and be sore winners in the primary... ljm2002 Jun 2016 #23

Bleak.... peace13 Jun 2016 #2

The time has come to lay down our digital arms. If we need a June 16 deadline imposed on us Trust Buster Jun 2016 #3

B.S. this is not a negative attack. avaistheone1 Jun 2016 #8

Re-read the last highlight in the OP and tell me that will fly on June 16. Trust Buster Jun 2016 #11

Well, at least I can stop being whatever a "Democrat" is, these days! n/t djean111 Jun 2016 #5

This. nt vintx Jun 2016 #21

+1. nt ncliberal Jun 2016 #43

The AP can count to 2383. They did so, and reported the results. TwilightZone Jun 2016 #7

Why is every critique 'whining'? floppyboo Jun 2016 #12

A critique based on intentionally false information is not a critique. TwilightZone Jun 2016 #15

A critique is an argued opinion based on interpretation of facts floppyboo Jun 2016 #20

Hillary now has 2,178 pledged delegates. We do not know how the SDs will vote in July. senz Jun 2016 #22

You don't know how the pledged delegates are going to vote either Trenzalore Jun 2016 #42

First, they did not just "count to 2383"... ljm2002 Jun 2016 #25

I missed Hillary's victory speech last was she wearing Tweed by any chance? azurnoir Jun 2016 #10

*Snerk* bvf Jun 2016 #16

well I'm not sure if it's still in fashion oe what azurnoir Jun 2016 #17

Apt, it is. libdem4life Jun 2016 #18

Damn surprised that it took 26 minutes edgineered Jun 2016 #30

Yeap, ANOTHER sanders post making an issue of what Clinton wears... .sigh... so deaf uponit7771 Jun 2016 #26

Whoosh! (Never gets old, Ed.) bvf Jun 2016 #31

Kickin' for the truth! Faux pas Jun 2016 #14

Bullshit: This is how it ended AllTooEasy Jun 2016 #29

Yep. The last cheating dishonesty in a long dishonest career. senz Jun 2016 #24

Ask Ken Starr how that worked out for him. nt msanthrope Jun 2016 #27

Better you should ask Al Gore. bvf Jun 2016 #33

Al forgot to use a popular President, and got screwed by Nader. nt msanthrope Jun 2016 #34

Al didn't dare let a blown president bvf Jun 2016 #35

Nonsense. Clinton had record approval ratings leaving office. And your use of the term msanthrope Jun 2016 #36

Nope. Not nonsense at all. bvf Jun 2016 #37

73% approval rating after impeachment...from your own link. Thanks for proving msanthrope Jun 2016 #40

So you can't dispute the numbers I posted, choosing bvf Jun 2016 #41

I find that the people most concerned about Bill's infidelities tend to have Karma msanthrope Jun 2016 #44

So you have nothing to say bvf Jun 2016 #45

Oh....I think I said it. You did, too. Or did you not realize precisely what you telegraphed to msanthrope Jun 2016 #46

Ask Ken Starr how that worked out for him. nt msanthrope Jun 2016 #32

"The Democratic Party got exactly the ending it deserved" Tarc Jun 2016 #47

She is the establishment candidate. All of the money and media are in her favor. Doctor_J Jun 2016 #48