Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
In reply to the discussion: Liberals Roar As Bernie Sanders Joins Elizabeth Warren On Bill To Reinstate Glass Steagall [View all]Duval
(4,280 posts)21. I'm wondering, LOoniX!
She should!
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
193 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Liberals Roar As Bernie Sanders Joins Elizabeth Warren On Bill To Reinstate Glass Steagall [View all]
sabrina 1
Jul 2015
OP
It was a terrible crisis, but I don't think it had the impact on the international and our
JDPriestly
Jul 2015
#94
That's a tiny fraction of what taxpayers lost in the post-2008 bailout of AIG/Goldman Sachs,
snot
Jul 2015
#98
If the supporters of Capitialism want to save the system(again), this needs to be done
Hydra
Jul 2015
#2
This one issue alone should be enough to eliminate anyone from consideration for the Presidency. n/t
A Simple Game
Jul 2015
#56
Lol, I didn't notice that!! A slip of the tongue/fingers, no fault of the mind!
sabrina 1
Jul 2015
#37
I was assured by a Hillary supporter that no, because Hillary knows it's impossible
AtheistCrusader
Jul 2015
#90
Yes, they are a force to be reckoned with. They just keep on telling the truth
sabrina 1
Jul 2015
#25
When will this be up for a vote? This is something that we need to get behind in the same way we
jwirr
Jul 2015
#26
The poster said she was a latino supporting Sanders; I wondered if she was aware of his vote.
SunSeeker
Jul 2015
#139
This thread is about Sanders. The poster brought up latino support for Sanders.
SunSeeker
Jul 2015
#146
If you know what it said, why do you claim "this" has nothing to do with foreign governments?
merrily
Jul 2015
#150
Nope. No matter how many times you mischaracterize the amendment, it was not about
merrily
Jul 2015
#154
Are you seriously saying this amendment was not about legitimizing Minuteman groups?
SunSeeker
Jul 2015
#157
Bernie's vote was not against the Department of Homeland Security. It was for racist militias.
SunSeeker
Jul 2015
#141
No, it was against funding to notify foreign governments of the activities of Americans inside the
merrily
Jul 2015
#152
Not just any activities: just "organized volunteer civilian action groups" near Mexico.
SunSeeker
Jul 2015
#155
Yes, so? You keep repeating the same stuff without any facts or analysis. And the more you do, the
merrily
Jul 2015
#156
This is what your virtual murder prosecution comes down to? And, I've answered that already.
merrily
Jul 2015
#159
It prevents our government from warning Mexico about the murderous activities of these militias.
SunSeeker
Jul 2015
#166
No, you have not even shown that. And you are again mischaracterizing the amendment, which says
merrily
Jul 2015
#167
No, you just said it prohibited use of ANY money for notifications. It doesn't.
merrily
Jul 2015
#174
Nope. Money from one bill. And you still have not explained how that changed a thing. Again,
merrily
Jul 2015
#176
It's not just any bill, it's the bill funding the whole Department of Homeland Security.
SunSeeker
Jul 2015
#177
"even if it can't be tied to the Flores murders." It can't, but is that your apology
merrily
Jul 2015
#178
It did prohibit just any notifications - only notifications about militias along the Mexico border.
SunSeeker
Jul 2015
#179
Nope. AGAIN, it prohibited use of money from the one bill it amended for notifications.
merrily
Jul 2015
#180
Prohibiting fed agency use of money for an activity is prohibiting the activity.
SunSeeker
Jul 2015
#181
"Prohibiting fed agency use of money for an activity is prohibiting the activity." Nope, that is
merrily
Jul 2015
#182
Actually, I don't wonder. Smears don't work on me, but they do on other people.
merrily
Jul 2015
#184
Fact is that most all of the lands in question, are very large ranches and farms.
DhhD
Jul 2015
#189
Yes - I Will No Longer Settle For The Lesser Of Two Corporate Evils - Go Bernie Go
cantbeserious
Jul 2015
#32
Obama was given the nomination::Bernie has never been a leader: He is a talker
lewebley3
Jul 2015
#143
Baloney. Also, stop pretending Sanders' supporters are going to be in charge of compromising or not
merrily
Jul 2015
#104
Ah, so we're backing away from "Why would she support the bill?" and going to "fuck off"
hughee99
Jul 2015
#123
Hillary will run her campaign for the American people: Not for left wing crazies
lewebley3
Jul 2015
#125
Yes, I know where she stands... against a $15 minimum wage and Glass-Steagall.
hughee99
Jul 2015
#126
Hillary has never said the was against the minimum: She has said America's need raise
lewebley3
Jul 2015
#128
Hillary's job right now is to lead the Party: She should not be champion one issue
lewebley3
Jul 2015
#135
Glass-Steagnall, is left wing talk show pet issue, it is a moot issue to most
lewebley3
Jul 2015
#131
Apparently it doesn't seem moot to several senators. I'm sure if things get tight in the primary
hughee99
Jul 2015
#134
So - One Plans To Settle For The Lesser Of Two Corporate Evils - All Too Sad
cantbeserious
Jul 2015
#42
HRC Is Also Captive Of Wall Street And The 1% - In Other Words A Corporate Patron
cantbeserious
Jul 2015
#48
Believe What You Want To Believe - Others Know The Truth About This DLC - Third Way - One Percenter
cantbeserious
Jul 2015
#53
If only folks would read the last paragraph of your post. Fact is, Dodd-Frank and Volcker
Hoyt
Jul 2015
#78
There are facts and opinions and statements that purport to be fact, but are not.
merrily
Jul 2015
#111
Oh, there are facts, okay. I was responding to your implication that I had my own personal set
merrily
Jul 2015
#115
"Sanders has been on the correct side of history more often than Dorgan."
pablo_marmol
Jul 2015
#160
It should have been a condition of the bailout.....no Glass-Steagall....no money.
yourout
Jul 2015
#117
Yes they do. And we have to get more like them into Congress. Imagine what a different
sabrina 1
Jul 2015
#165
Even if you knew nothing about Glass-Steagal and its purpose, the mere fact that
Joe Chi Minh
Jul 2015
#187