Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

History of Feminism

Showing Original Post only (View all)

redqueen

(115,113 posts)
Tue Jun 12, 2012, 03:12 PM Jun 2012

Violence Against Women Disguised as ‘Fashion’ [View all]

http://jezebel.com/5916650/fashions-ongoing-violence-against-women/

Bulgarian fashion magazine 12 just published an appalling editorial containing nothing but portraits of models with horrific injuries. It's a "beauty" spread — the kind of feature that normally highlights a makeup artist's skills and aims to sell the "new" eyeshadow color of the season —but it isn't very beautiful. There are models with Black Dahlia-style Glasgow Smiles, models who've been strangled, models who've had their earrings and facial piercings ripped out, and models who've been mutilated with acid. It's all special-effects makeup, but it's still sickening. These photos give you an idea the nature of the spread. And it's hardly the first of its kind.

It'sa given that fashion magazines— like other forms of mass media —often aim to shock. Because they like the attention. Because they like the ad dollars. Because they like the rebellious reputation that shocking us squares confers. But it's still worthwhile to examine the means by which they achieve that shock value. The high-fashion world in general loves to think of itself as contrarian, élite, and boldly at odds with the tastes and mores of the wider public. It likes to think that it, in fact, leads those tastes. But much of the imagery the fashion industry uses to communicate its messages at best echoes and at worst reinforces some of the wider culture's most negative ideas about women and girls. As we all know thanks to Joan Didion, "it ispossible for people to be the unconscious instruments of values they would strenuously reject on a conscious level." Fashion, in all its contradictions, is great evidence of that.

The history of fashion is rife with depictions of and references to violence against women. Historically, photographers including Helmut Newton and Guy Bourdin had a particular fascination with bloodied, bruised, or dead models, whom they often depicted in sexualized positions (a vein that contemporary fashion photographer Steven Klein continues to probe). The "dead girl" is such a trope of ladymags that it was imitated on America's Next Top Model— five years ago.

As Margi Laird McHue wrote in her 2008 book, Domestic Violence: A Reference Handbook, this kind of imagery is highly problematic.

...
36 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
And the sick photographers and editors JustAnotherGen Jun 2012 #1
Please don't apologize for that... redqueen Jun 2012 #3
The more I dig into an article I'm writing for an esoteric publication seabeyond Jun 2012 #5
Hmmm JustAnotherGen Jun 2012 #6
totally, totally... seabeyond Jun 2012 #7
Magdalener JustAnotherGen Jun 2012 #9
well... seabeyond Jun 2012 #10
Thanks for your discussion here. MadrasT Jun 2012 #17
with all of this subject you have been research and learning about seabeyond Jun 2012 #8
Yes JustAnotherGen Jun 2012 #11
wow. lol seabeyond Jun 2012 #13
yes... our entertainment today as we are constantly told that this does not effect us seabeyond Jun 2012 #2
Yep! redqueen Jun 2012 #4
Or entranced JustAnotherGen Jun 2012 #12
Or entranced seabeyond Jun 2012 #14
somehow MadrasT Jun 2012 #15
snorkin' right there with ya. lol. seabeyond Jun 2012 #16
Tangentially related... laconicsax Jun 2012 #18
"Lighten up Francine" seabeyond Jun 2012 #19
They can't be bothered to acknowledge the female gender even in their insults. yardwork Jun 2012 #20
Francis is strictly a male name??? opiate69 Jun 2012 #25
That's a good point. lol! But the reference is to a male character in a film. yardwork Jun 2012 #26
oh I know... Love that movie and often use that quote on my 14 year old lol opiate69 Jun 2012 #29
It's truly a classic line. yardwork Jun 2012 #31
so many in that movie! But I wont derail any further! opiate69 Jun 2012 #32
This is appalling but a logical continuation of the fashion industry's long-time behavior. yardwork Jun 2012 #21
First We Take Manhattan seabeyond Jun 2012 #22
Most people focus on the terrorism angle, but they overlook the references to the fashion industry. yardwork Jun 2012 #30
i saw that.... actually... seabeyond Jun 2012 #33
Jennifer Warnes did a recording of Leonard Cohen songs. I love it. Look for Famous Blue Raincoat. yardwork Jun 2012 #34
i was reading about brooke shields the other day seabeyond Jun 2012 #23
“reveal the femininity of prepubescent girls by comparing them to adult women” seabeyond Jun 2012 #24
and Hugh Hefner and Flynt are celebrated here on DU. redqueen Jun 2012 #27
yes they are, little... i mean very little, gutter dwellers that they are. nt seabeyond Jun 2012 #28
Of course they are. They're only interested in preserving free speech rights. laconicsax Jun 2012 #35
the high heeled shoe should be a giveaway BlueToTheBone Jun 2012 #36
Latest Discussions»Alliance Forums»History of Feminism»Violence Against Women Di...»Reply #0