Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

U.S. Companies Eye Trans-Afghan Pipeline

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-19-05 03:06 AM
Original message
U.S. Companies Eye Trans-Afghan Pipeline
http://www.myafghan.com/news2.asp?id=577434660

ASHGABAT, Turkmenistan (AP) -- American companies might join a long-delayed trans-Afghan natural gas pipeline project expected to be launched in 2006, the U.S. ambassador to Turkmenistan said Tuesday.

"We are seriously looking at the project, and it is quite possible that American companies will join it," U.S. Ambassador Tracey Anne Jacobson said, speaking in Russian, after a meeting with Turkmen President Saparmurat Niyazov.

The Turkmen government said Monday that a feasibility study for the project for a pipeline from the gas-rich Central Asian nation through Afghanistan and Pakistan was complete, and that construction would begin in 2006.

U.S. company Unocal Corp., based in El Segundo, California, was considering participation in the project in the 1990s, but plans were abandoned when the United States fired cruise missiles into Afghanistan in 1998 in pursuit of Osama bin Laden's al-Qaida network, blamed for two U.S. embassy bombings that year in East Africa.

more

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
IndianaGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-19-05 03:10 AM
Response to Original message
1. The resurrection of an old PNAC dream
looks like Afghanistan is stable enough to dust off those prewar oil exploitation plans.

Who says this wasn't about OIL?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NYC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-19-05 03:13 AM
Response to Original message
2. No! What a surprise!
So Bridas is out, and Unocal is back in? Karzai is the perfect man for the job.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-19-05 03:37 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. I was reading that Unocal Karzai is celebrating it all with his two wives
Republican values for you.

Don

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NYC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-19-05 04:18 AM
Response to Reply #4
8. No wonder he won't be seen in public with his wife.
He has two. I didn't know that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The_Casual_Observer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-19-05 03:20 AM
Response to Original message
3. "a long-delayed trans-Afghan natural gas pipeline"
Are we still going to supply them with the long delayed "carpet of gold"?

Much easier to deal with uncle karzai than the filthy Taliban I suppose.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tkmorris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-19-05 03:56 AM
Response to Original message
5. Doubt it will happen
There really is almost no chance for such a pipeline to remain intact for even as long as a week at a stretch. It would be the primary target of every warlord in the nation. Just MHO of course.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UL_Approved Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-19-05 04:12 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. Maybe it would, maybe it wouldn't
What is to say that the bombings in Iraq are "acts of insurgency"? How do we know what is going on there?

It would be interesting to see if that project would work or not. Remember, the planners would have to look at Iraq at some point, and assess that petroleum extraction or transportation is utterly impractical. With all of the money to be lost if the project failed, do you really think that they would have considered it in the first place?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tkmorris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-19-05 06:32 AM
Response to Reply #7
10. These guys?
Yeah, actually I do. Well actually it depends on who underwrites the project. If it is the Bush admin or their puppets in Afghanistan then yes, they would cheerfully erect a pipeline doomed to fail. They are constantly underestimating the effect they have on people and probably believe they could control the pipeline without more than nuisance attacks upon it.

Now, if it is to be the oil companies to pay for it you have a different story perhaps. I think UNOCAL was mentioned was it not? I don't believe that they would consider the cost/benefit ratio to be worthy of consideration at this time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
theresistance Donating Member (595 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-19-05 03:59 AM
Response to Original message
6. This sort of confirms everything that was said about
the invasion of Afghanistan, oil pipleline-wise...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftchick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-19-05 05:04 AM
Response to Original message
9. so they get both carpets?
the gold and the bomb carpets. Unocal Karzai gets the gold one of course. The Afghanis get the bombs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Exit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-19-05 08:19 AM
Response to Original message
11. They talk like this was some "new" possibility
when if you just read up on what has really been happening in Afghanistan, our invasion is just one step on a continuum which included Unocal interfering with Bridas' contractual relationships, etc. There's even a federal (5th Circuit) decision already out there in which Bridas sued for that. Bridas won. Yet Unocal has been "in" as far as this pipeline, for some years now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leesa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-19-05 08:50 AM
Response to Reply #11
14. And then, miraculously, Argentina's economy was collapsed by IMF
Wonder how THAT happened.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Exit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-19-05 09:09 AM
Response to Reply #14
16. Good point--Bridas is an Argentine corporation...
I hadn't made that connection, but it makes sense.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Backlash Cometh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-19-05 08:20 AM
Response to Original message
12. Isn't this what the Cheney-Energy meetings were all about?
You know, the meetings that set-off the hornet's nest and resulted in the 9/11 attacks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leesa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-19-05 08:49 AM
Response to Original message
13. But, of course, that's NOT why we invaded Afghanistan. RIGHT.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-19-05 09:14 AM
Response to Reply #13
17. Many people thought it was so Afghan women didn't have to wear a burqa
And to catch bin Laden. Neither of which has materialized. Osama is still making videos and the Afghan women are still wearing a burqa.

Don

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bemildred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-19-05 08:59 AM
Response to Original message
15.  China oil firm 'plans Unocal bid'
Chinese energy giant CNOOC is planning a major acquisition which could hugely boost its Asian assets, reports say.

The plan, according to the Financial Times, is to offer some $13bn (£7bn) for US firm Unocal, which operates in both Asia and the US.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/business/4154563.stm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
plasticsundance Donating Member (786 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-19-05 09:32 AM
Response to Original message
18. It will end up a disaster
Afghanistan is far from stable, and just because Karzai won an election still doesn't change the fact that he's just the mayor of Kabul.

Here is an update on Afghanistan:

http://www.alertnet.org/thenews/newsdesk/IRIN/afc581b729dafa28518ea3c2ef6a5ed1.htm


Aid agencies had to operate in tougher security conditions in 2004 than previously with 23 humanitarian workers killed compared to 13 in 2003. The attacks forced them to lower their profiles in some provinces. This was highlighted when medical aid agency Medecins Sans Frontieres (MSF) pulled out of the country in late July because of the killing of five of its staff and the risk of further attacks, ending 24 years in Afghanistan. The deaths led to calls for more government support for aid agencies which often work in isolated provinces. A Taliban spokesman said it carried out the attack, saying MSF staff were working for US interests.


Here's a good article:

http://www.columbiariverpeace.org/Article_Pages/Oil_War/Oil_War.html

First, it is interesting that, UNOCAL's attack of conscience seems only to have been in Afghanistan and not in other areas such as Burma where UNOCAL's investment in the Yadana Gas Pipeline has resulted in an increase in abuses such as extrajudicial killings, torture, rape and extortion.(5) Second, since the overthrow of the Taliban Regime, financing for the project is possible. And, lucky for the oil project, the top position in the post Taliban interim government is US-backed Afghanistanian Hamid Karzai, a former UNOCAL oil consultant. In addition, Bush- nominated Zalmay Khalilad, also a former UNOCAL consultant, is presently the special envoy to Afghanistan, who before Sept 11, among other questionable activities included lobbying for a more sympathetic US Government policy toward the Taliban.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WannaJumpMyScooter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-19-05 09:45 AM
Response to Reply #18
20. Like an obvious disaster has ever stopped an Empire
from doing something?

Of course it will be a disaster, that is what affirms their existance!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Robb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-19-05 09:37 AM
Response to Original message
19. I've always argued it hardly matters if it's Unocal...
...As long as whoever's exploiting the resource is partnered with Unocal (or whoever) elsewhere, that's income earned and resources not used that can be helpful to the company. They don't have to set a single boot in country to benefit, as long as a partner does.

Read this short, short piece I wrote for Bartcop back in.... egad, November 2001. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Oct 31st 2024, 05:50 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC