|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) |
![]() |
mike1963
![]() |
Thu May-20-04 10:06 PM Original message |
Big "outrage" on Tulsa TV about "upskirting" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Djinn
![]() |
Thu May-20-04 10:10 PM Response to Original message |
1. the "upskirting" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mike1963
![]() |
Thu May-20-04 10:14 PM Response to Reply #1 |
7. But they never suggested the shots were compromising in any way. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Djinn
![]() |
Thu May-20-04 10:20 PM Response to Reply #7 |
15. why do you think it's called UPskirting - that's not a suggestion |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
corriger
![]() |
Thu May-20-04 10:15 PM Response to Reply #1 |
8. exactly Djinn |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lolly
![]() |
Thu May-20-04 10:11 PM Response to Original message |
2. Are you serious? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mike1963
![]() |
Thu May-20-04 10:16 PM Response to Reply #2 |
9. Nobody has been accused of revealing anything UNDER the skirt. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lolly
![]() |
Thu May-20-04 10:20 PM Response to Reply #9 |
13. Um, can you? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bluestateguy
![]() |
Thu May-20-04 10:12 PM Response to Original message |
3. Not relevant |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
corriger
![]() |
Thu May-20-04 10:17 PM Response to Reply #3 |
10. merely nineties? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
havocmom
![]() |
Thu May-20-04 10:13 PM Response to Original message |
4. A short skirt is not an invitation to peek at panties |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
No2W2004
![]() |
Thu May-20-04 10:13 PM Response to Original message |
5. Smells like a "sweeps report" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Old and In the Way
![]() |
Thu May-20-04 10:47 PM Response to Reply #5 |
24. Bingo |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Newsjock
![]() |
Thu May-20-04 10:13 PM Response to Original message |
6. It's sweeps month |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
corriger
![]() |
Thu May-20-04 10:19 PM Response to Reply #6 |
12. the taser |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lolly
![]() |
Thu May-20-04 10:24 PM Response to Reply #6 |
18. Germs lurk in motel rooms? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
No2W2004
![]() |
Thu May-20-04 10:32 PM Response to Reply #18 |
22. The sperm light! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
petronius
![]() |
Thu May-20-04 10:57 PM Response to Reply #6 |
25. Do I get to choose the reporter? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AP
![]() |
Thu May-20-04 10:19 PM Response to Original message |
11. If someone took your picture to masturbate to, would you be upset? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Columbia
![]() |
Thu May-20-04 10:21 PM Response to Reply #11 |
16. I'd be flattered |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mike1963
![]() |
Thu May-20-04 10:23 PM Response to Reply #11 |
17. Yikes! If someone wanted MY picture to jerkoff to, I'd be ecstatic! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Djinn
![]() |
Thu May-20-04 10:32 PM Response to Reply #17 |
21. would you say that if |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DemBones DemBones
![]() |
Thu May-20-04 10:20 PM Response to Original message |
14. Oh, come on. This new juvenile behavior is just as |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mike1963
![]() |
Thu May-20-04 10:33 PM Response to Reply #14 |
23. My last post on this, I promise. There was NO suggestion that any |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Djinn
![]() |
Thu May-20-04 10:57 PM Response to Reply #23 |
26. sigh |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LizW
![]() |
Thu May-20-04 10:30 PM Response to Original message |
19. How pathetic would a person have to be |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seabeyond
![]() |
Thu May-20-04 10:32 PM Response to Original message |
20. somewhere along the way our males have really walked |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Fri Jun 14th 2024, 07:51 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC