Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

PUMApac founder has a history of FRAUD.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Politics/Campaigns Donate to DU
 
theantipuma Donating Member (21 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-30-08 09:13 AM
Original message
PUMApac founder has a history of FRAUD.
Edited on Sat Aug-30-08 09:15 AM by theantipuma
From http://yestodemocracy.com:
I got my hands on some silly little case law file that MAY just MAY be connected to miss always victimized Darragh Murphy. It It goes a little something like this (full case file linked there):
JOSEPH BRAUNSTEIN, CHAPTER 7 TRUSTEE
FOR THE ESTATE OF ROWANOAK CORPORATION,

Appellant,

v.

ANN WALSH,

Appellee.


On January 8, 1999, Rowanoak filed a voluntary petition for Chapter 7 relief. During the course of the bankruptcy proceeding, the Trustee requested that Rowanoak turn over all of its books and records, as well as its canceled checks and bank statements. In response, Rowanoak turned over only canceled checks and bank statements. In reviewing these documents, the Trustee discovered that from March 5, 1997, through May 20, 1997, Rowanoak made six payments from its bank account to Murphy's mother, Ann Walsh. The checks totaled $63,344. (3)
---
3. The six checks were as follows: (1) check number 1235 dated March 5 for $12,000; (2) check number 1237 dated March 6 for $14,000; (3) check number 1282 dated March 21 for $10,000; (4) check number 1306 dated April 7 for $18,244; (5) check number 1308 dated April 7 for $4,100; and (6) check number 1371 dated May 20 for $5,000.
----
Having affirmed the bankruptcy court on all issues pertaining to its finding Rowanoak's transfers to Walsh were fraudulent under Mass. Gen. Laws ch. 109A, � 5, we need not discuss the bankruptcy court's finding that Rowanoak's transfers to Walsh also were fraudulent under � 6(a). (7) For the reasons stated, we conclude the district court erred in reversing the bankruptcy court. Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is REVERSED.
---
7.In reversing the bankruptcy court, the district court appeared to confuse the elements of claims under these two sections. The district court incorrectly identified the bankruptcy court's finding that the payments to Walsh rendered Rowanoak insolvent as an element of a � 5 claim. But this finding goes to the Trustee's claim under � 6(a). See Mass. Gen. Laws ch. 109a, � 6 (transfer is fraudulent under � 6(a) "if the debtor made the transfer or incurred the obligation without receiving a reasonably equivalent value in exchange for the transfer or obligation and . . . the debtor became insolvent as a result of the transfer or obligation."). Even if the bankruptcy court's finding that Rowanoak's payments to Walsh rendered Rowanoak insolvent was clearly erroneous, Walsh still must reimburse the payments as fraudulent transfers under � 5.


SPREAD THE WORD.. what credibility does Darragh Murphy have?? She has taken money from her previous business and now she is accepting donations on her website in which NOTHING has materialized from.
Digg this, spread the word, email your contacts :) Support our site.
Refresh | +3 Recommendations Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
Catch22Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-30-08 09:18 AM
Response to Original message
1. I can't think of a scummier person on the planet right now
I'm sure someone will come along to take her place soon, but right now, she's at the top of the shit heap.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
theantipuma Donating Member (21 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-30-08 09:27 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Me Either.
This entire coalition needs to get off the news. I am so sick of seeing Darragh's face on TV!
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
qazplm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-30-08 09:42 AM
Response to Original message
3. i think i can safely say
we all can safely say that Murphy looks crazed just by appearance alone. There were three women on the screen yesterday, my girlfriend did not know murphy, i did and said look at that crazy woman, she said, you mean the one on the right? (murphy of course was the one on the right).
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Catch22Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-30-08 01:34 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. I know exactly what you're talking about, it was MSNBC
I'm sorry how bad I am with names, but it was the beautiful African American reporter, another woman, and Murphy on the right. She was all hunched over leaning towards the camera and called Palin a moderate. Yeah, fucking crazy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Jun 04th 2024, 08:17 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Politics/Campaigns Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC