Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Divided we stand: Arguing over what is and is not a fact

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Media Donate to DU
 
DeepModem Mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-25-08 10:33 PM
Original message
Divided we stand: Arguing over what is and is not a fact
Raleigh News-Observer: Divided we stand
By J. Peder Zane, Staff Writer

....(R)esearchers and writers examining our nation's splintering soul have found new fissures in the psyche of our body politic. Much more than in the past, they say, Americans are receding into separate worlds in which they hold increasingly different notions of what is real and what is not.

What role does a fact play?

On issues ranging from global warming and evolution to the war in Iraq, we are not just coming to different conclusions about the same set of facts, but are arguing over what exactly is and is not a fact. Hot-button issues have become Rorschach blots -- some of us see a bird, others a frog; few seem willing to admit that they might be both....

***

...Salon.com writer Farhad Manjoo pursues this line of thought in his new book, "True Enough: Learning to Live in a Post-Fact Society." He argues that the highly partisan nature of so many political Web sites, cable TV shows and talk radio programs means Americans can now choose to listen only to voices they agree with. In the Rush Limbaugh/Keith Olbermann echo chamber, fact and opinion merge into a highly charged mess.

"No longer are we merely holding opinions different from one another; we're also holding different facts," Manjoo writes. "Increasingly, our arguments aren't over what we should be doing -- in the Iraq war, in the war on terrorism, on global warming, or about any number of controversial subjects -- but instead over what is happening."

In this mind-set, we don't seek information to expand our view of the world but seize on facts and opinions that confirm our biases....

http://www.newsobserver.com/105/story/1084351.html
Refresh | 0 Recommendations Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
Warpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-25-08 10:37 PM
Response to Original message
1. I think he's looking in all the wrong places
He needs to look at what we think of the war, what we think of the economy and how it rewards us for our work, what we think of health insurance companies, and what we think of how corporations are running this country.

He'd get a real earful and he wouldn't see much of a divide, at all.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
mrcheerful Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-25-08 11:11 PM
Response to Original message
2. I don't belong to any organized political party....
I belong to the Democratic party. Get over it man, put 2 liberals in a room and your sure to have disorganization going on, it's just our independence coming out. See thats why repukes can't be anything but Torie off spring, they want to play follow the leader and will march behind anyone with an R behind their name, no matter if said R is somewhat left of their beliefs. Btw, anyone left of Adolf is extreme to R followers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Berry Cool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-26-08 08:25 AM
Response to Original message
3. I'm not sure whether it's the author of this article or Manjoo, but
whoever's mashing up Rush Limbaugh with Keith Olbermann and implying that they both are guilty of mashing fact with opinion is wrong.

Rush, indeed, mashes fact and opinion every day. That is part of Keith's problem with him. Keith knows and separates opinions from facts. He staunchly maintains that you have a right to your own opinion, but you do not have a right to your own facts.

Then again, I am not sure the author of the article cares. He quotes David Brooks as some sort of authoity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DeepModem Mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-26-08 09:38 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. Good point. As I read it back, I'm not sure either who's making the analogy.
As you know, I post things I don't agree with, or don't agree completely with -- and posted this in Media as one of several articles I've posted on political polarization.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Jun 07th 2024, 12:17 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Media Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC