|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » September 11 |
![]() |
wildbilln864
![]() |
Sat Jun-20-09 01:22 AM Original message |
29 Engineers .... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
procopia
![]() |
Sun Jun-21-09 12:31 PM Response to Original message |
1. Great article--definitive "truther logic" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bolo Boffin
![]() |
Sun Jun-21-09 12:34 PM Response to Reply #1 |
2. Pegelow's funny. He thinks nukes brought the towers down. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
procopia
![]() |
Sun Jun-21-09 12:38 PM Response to Reply #2 |
3. OCTists are funny |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bolo Boffin
![]() |
Sun Jun-21-09 01:28 PM Response to Reply #3 |
4. I don't think that at all |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ghost in the Machine
![]() |
Sun Jun-21-09 01:43 PM Response to Reply #4 |
6. Produce ONE picture of WTC 7 'engulfed in flames'..... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hack89
![]() |
Mon Jun-22-09 06:03 AM Response to Reply #6 |
9. Here's a good analysis of the fires |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
procopia
![]() |
Mon Jun-22-09 12:38 PM Response to Reply #9 |
10. How do you know it's a good analysis? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hack89
![]() |
Mon Jun-22-09 07:27 PM Response to Reply #10 |
11. Lets see ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
procopia
![]() |
Mon Jun-22-09 07:37 PM Response to Reply #11 |
13. Again, does this paper apply to WTC 7? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hack89
![]() |
Mon Jun-22-09 08:31 PM Response to Reply #13 |
14. My mistake - the OP is about the WTC and I thought your post 3 was also. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
procopia
![]() |
Tue Jun-23-09 06:22 AM Response to Reply #14 |
17. That's right |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
victordrazen
![]() |
Mon Jun-22-09 11:50 PM Response to Reply #11 |
15. Your "prestigious" professors weren't there |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hack89
![]() |
Tue Jun-23-09 05:49 AM Response to Reply #15 |
16. I see you have your CT buzz words down pat |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
procopia
![]() |
Tue Jun-23-09 10:54 AM Response to Reply #11 |
19. See this: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wildbilln864
![]() |
Tue Jun-23-09 06:27 PM Response to Reply #19 |
31. Ow! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hack89
![]() |
Tue Jun-23-09 08:35 PM Response to Reply #19 |
33. Nice strawman - even NIST says that the jet fuel burned off in abut 10 minutes |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
procopia
![]() |
Wed Jun-24-09 05:26 PM Response to Reply #33 |
37. If you would read |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hack89
![]() |
Wed Jun-24-09 06:00 PM Response to Reply #37 |
38. Notice how he never mentions the temperature of a typical office fire? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hack89
![]() |
Wed Jun-24-09 06:03 PM Response to Reply #37 |
39. Megawatts of energy is not a huge fire? OK? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
procopia
![]() |
Wed Jun-24-09 09:48 PM Response to Reply #39 |
53. south tower: is this your massive smoke plume? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hack89
![]() |
Thu Jun-25-09 01:16 AM Response to Reply #53 |
64. You call these weak ? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
procopia
![]() |
Thu Jun-25-09 06:25 AM Response to Reply #64 |
65. Again, when did I |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hack89
![]() |
Thu Jun-25-09 07:08 AM Response to Reply #65 |
66. The fires were hot enough and large enough |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
procopia
![]() |
Fri Jun-26-09 10:30 PM Response to Reply #66 |
71. According to your source, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wildbilln864
![]() |
Sat Jun-27-09 01:20 AM Response to Reply #71 |
74. That hada hurt! nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hack89
![]() |
Sat Jun-27-09 03:40 AM Response to Reply #74 |
81. Would you care to show me where it says that? nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
procopia
![]() |
Sat Jun-27-09 06:26 AM Response to Reply #81 |
83. You didn't read it? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hack89
![]() |
Sat Jun-27-09 03:39 AM Response to Reply #71 |
80. I think you need to read closer |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hack89
![]() |
Sat Jun-27-09 07:05 AM Response to Reply #71 |
84. I see now what you are talking about |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wildbilln864
![]() |
Sat Jun-27-09 11:08 AM Response to Reply #84 |
93. so you actually think... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hack89
![]() |
Sat Jun-27-09 01:17 PM Response to Reply #93 |
97. Well, you can feel free to rebute the paper I posted, nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
procopia
![]() |
Sat Jun-27-09 11:20 AM Response to Reply #84 |
96. Define mainstream science |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hack89
![]() |
Sat Jun-27-09 01:25 PM Response to Reply #96 |
98. Why not analysis the dust that was spread inches thick all over NYC? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
procopia
![]() |
Sat Jun-27-09 03:31 PM Response to Reply #98 |
99. Again, define "mainstream science" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hack89
![]() |
Sun Jun-28-09 06:52 AM Response to Reply #99 |
107. So Jones didn't find any high explosives. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
procopia
![]() |
Sun Jun-28-09 07:05 AM Response to Reply #107 |
108. Who tested |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hack89
![]() |
Sun Jun-28-09 07:23 AM Response to Reply #108 |
110. We discussed this paper in this forum in great detail |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
procopia
![]() |
Sun Jun-28-09 07:29 AM Response to Reply #110 |
111. Do you ever answer simple questions? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hack89
![]() |
Sun Jun-28-09 09:03 AM Response to Reply #111 |
112. I get tired of truthers that dig up old topics without first doing some research |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
procopia
![]() |
Sun Jun-28-09 02:40 PM Response to Reply #112 |
114. LOL, because you know the answer is |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bolo Boffin
![]() |
Wed Jun-24-09 07:26 PM Response to Reply #37 |
45. Tell me something |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Wed Jun-24-09 12:35 PM Response to Reply #6 |
36. Deleted message |
whatchamacallit
![]() |
Sun Jun-21-09 01:39 PM Response to Reply #3 |
5. As long as the OCT can rely on esoteric hypotheses to explain what the rational mind rejects |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bolo Boffin
![]() |
Sun Jun-21-09 02:45 PM Response to Reply #5 |
7. What a lovely Sunday today is! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TheWatcher
![]() |
Wed Jun-24-09 12:34 PM Response to Reply #7 |
35. Probably a good idea. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SDuderstadt
![]() |
Mon Jun-22-09 07:35 PM Response to Reply #5 |
12. "Truther Logic" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
whatchamacallit
![]() |
Tue Jun-23-09 11:28 AM Response to Reply #12 |
20. There are "scientific" theories postulated on both sides of the 9/11 divide |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SDuderstadt
![]() |
Tue Jun-23-09 12:46 PM Response to Reply #20 |
21. If the ''truth movement'' is on the right path... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
whatchamacallit
![]() |
Tue Jun-23-09 01:54 PM Response to Reply #21 |
22. Dunno |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SDuderstadt
![]() |
Tue Jun-23-09 02:21 PM Response to Reply #22 |
24. I never asked why scientists aren't ''marching in the streets''... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
whatchamacallit
![]() |
Tue Jun-23-09 02:49 PM Response to Reply #24 |
25. Maybe |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wildbilln864
![]() |
Tue Jun-23-09 03:13 PM Response to Reply #25 |
26. Excellent reply whatcha! nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
whatchamacallit
![]() |
Tue Jun-23-09 03:19 PM Response to Reply #26 |
27. Thanks wildbill! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wildbilln864
![]() |
Sun Jul-05-09 03:23 PM Response to Reply #27 |
118. my pleasure whatch! nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SDuderstadt
![]() |
Tue Jun-23-09 05:10 PM Response to Reply #25 |
28. ''There's just as little evidence that 9/11 wasn't... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
whatchamacallit
![]() |
Tue Jun-23-09 05:56 PM Response to Reply #28 |
29. If a "critical thinking class" is what helped you attain your level of insight |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SDuderstadt
![]() |
Tue Jun-23-09 06:15 PM Response to Reply #29 |
30. Have you ever actually taken a critical thinking class? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Tue Jun-23-09 06:29 PM Response to Reply #30 |
32. Deleted message |
Realityhack
![]() |
Wed Jun-24-09 06:31 PM Response to Reply #30 |
40. Can we modify this to 'Do you know what a critical thinking class is?'? n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SDuderstadt
![]() |
Wed Jun-24-09 06:42 PM Response to Reply #40 |
41. We'd probably still get the same answer...no |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Realityhack
![]() |
Wed Jun-24-09 07:12 PM Response to Reply #41 |
42. I am reminded of creationists every time I read the 9-11 forum. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ghost in the Machine
![]() |
Thu Jun-25-09 01:01 AM Response to Reply #42 |
62. "What passes for critical thought, logic, and investigation in some peoples minds is stunning" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
whatchamacallit
![]() |
Wed Jun-24-09 07:17 PM Response to Reply #40 |
43. Lol @hack |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SDuderstadt
![]() |
Wed Jun-24-09 07:23 PM Response to Reply #43 |
44. Simple question... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wildbilln864
![]() |
Wed Jun-24-09 07:45 PM Response to Reply #44 |
46. you have to answer questions... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Wed Jun-24-09 07:53 PM Response to Reply #46 |
47. Deleted message |
wildbilln864
![]() |
Fri Jun-26-09 10:41 AM Response to Reply #47 |
67. People.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SDuderstadt
![]() |
Fri Jun-26-09 10:46 AM Response to Reply #67 |
68. And people reply to people "jumping in", Bill... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Fri Jun-26-09 02:26 PM Response to Reply #47 |
69. Deleted message |
whatchamacallit
![]() |
Wed Jun-24-09 08:29 PM Response to Reply #44 |
48. Formally? No. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SDuderstadt
![]() |
Wed Jun-24-09 08:39 PM Response to Reply #48 |
49. I'm saying that everyone I have known who has taken a critical thinking class says... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
whatchamacallit
![]() |
Wed Jun-24-09 08:49 PM Response to Reply #49 |
50. Fair enough |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SDuderstadt
![]() |
Wed Jun-24-09 08:54 PM Response to Reply #50 |
51. Let me pose a sincere question.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
whatchamacallit
![]() |
Wed Jun-24-09 09:31 PM Response to Reply #51 |
52. Like the people auditioning for American Idol who don't know they suck? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SDuderstadt
![]() |
Wed Jun-24-09 09:49 PM Response to Reply #52 |
54. I didn't say it was true of any and all but... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
whatchamacallit
![]() |
Wed Jun-24-09 10:56 PM Response to Reply #54 |
58. Absolutely |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SDuderstadt
![]() |
Wed Jun-24-09 11:11 PM Response to Reply #58 |
59. If you've never formally studied logical fallacies... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
whatchamacallit
![]() |
Wed Jun-24-09 11:33 PM Response to Reply #59 |
60. Oh brother... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SDuderstadt
![]() |
Thu Jun-25-09 12:16 AM Response to Reply #60 |
61. Then name the fallacy. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
whatchamacallit
![]() |
Thu Jun-25-09 01:07 AM Response to Reply #61 |
63. I'm not foolish enough to argue either (n/t) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kalun D
![]() |
Wed Jun-24-09 09:53 PM Response to Reply #49 |
56. PROOF |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SDuderstadt
![]() |
Wed Jun-24-09 09:59 PM Response to Reply #56 |
57. Read what I wrote carefully, Kalun... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Realityhack
![]() |
Fri Jun-26-09 10:07 PM Response to Reply #48 |
70. This post is exactly why you need to consider a formal critical thinking class. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
whatchamacallit
![]() |
Sat Jun-27-09 12:32 AM Response to Reply #70 |
72. Right Sherlock |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SDuderstadt
![]() |
Sat Jun-27-09 12:45 AM Response to Reply #72 |
73. Do you really want to argue that the more one is trained in critical thinking... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
whatchamacallit
![]() |
Sat Jun-27-09 01:35 AM Response to Reply #73 |
75. Calling you on your bullshit assertion doesn't mean I am trying to argue the opposite |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SDuderstadt
![]() |
Sat Jun-27-09 01:50 AM Response to Reply #75 |
76. Here's a challenge for you then. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Sat Jun-27-09 01:54 AM Response to Reply #76 |
77. Deleted message |
SDuderstadt
![]() |
Sat Jun-27-09 02:02 AM Response to Reply #77 |
78. Dude... Read carefully.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
whatchamacallit
![]() |
Sat Jun-27-09 02:08 AM Response to Reply #78 |
79. Unreal... It's not my responsibility to disprove shit you make up |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SDuderstadt
![]() |
Sat Jun-27-09 08:44 AM Response to Reply #79 |
85. Dude... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
whatchamacallit
![]() |
Sat Jun-27-09 09:33 AM Response to Reply #85 |
86. So, you want me |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SDuderstadt
![]() |
Sat Jun-27-09 10:01 AM Response to Reply #86 |
87. Do you really think critical thinking and conspiracy theories are on the same... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
whatchamacallit
![]() |
Sat Jun-27-09 10:36 AM Response to Reply #87 |
88. Being they are not the same thing, a direct comparison is inappropriate |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SDuderstadt
![]() |
Sat Jun-27-09 10:41 AM Response to Reply #88 |
89. Dude... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
whatchamacallit
![]() |
Sat Jun-27-09 11:02 AM Response to Reply #89 |
90. Ha, right |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SDuderstadt
![]() |
Sat Jun-27-09 11:06 AM Response to Reply #90 |
91. You ought to try actually addressing the issues I raise... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
whatchamacallit
![]() |
Sat Jun-27-09 11:08 AM Response to Reply #91 |
92. Um... this entire thread is me doing just that (nt) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SDuderstadt
![]() |
Sat Jun-27-09 11:09 AM Response to Reply #92 |
94. Umm... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
whatchamacallit
![]() |
Sat Jun-27-09 11:19 AM Response to Reply #94 |
95. We'll have to let others reading these posts judge for themselves... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Realityhack
![]() |
Sun Jun-28-09 09:12 AM Response to Reply #72 |
113. "If A knows absolutely nothing about B" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
procopia
![]() |
Tue Jun-23-09 02:03 PM Response to Reply #21 |
23. For the same reasons |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
procopia
![]() |
Sun Jun-21-09 10:10 PM Response to Original message |
8. Symmetry, totality |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hack89
![]() |
Wed Jun-24-09 05:29 AM Response to Reply #8 |
34. Since the impact loading was not asymmetrical and the fires were huge |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wildbilln864
![]() |
Wed Jun-24-09 09:49 PM Response to Reply #34 |
55. do you know that the.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LARED
![]() |
Sat Jun-27-09 05:59 AM Response to Reply #55 |
82. So what, that changes nothing nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ghost in the Machine
![]() |
Sat Jun-27-09 04:11 PM Response to Reply #82 |
100. Learn something about fulcrums and shifting loads then get back with us... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LARED
![]() |
Sun Jun-28-09 05:50 AM Response to Reply #100 |
102. Thanks for the Sunday morning dose of CT'er irony. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ghost in the Machine
![]() |
Sun Jun-28-09 06:33 AM Response to Reply #102 |
103. I wasn't expecting an intelligent response from you.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LARED
![]() |
Sun Jun-28-09 06:38 AM Response to Reply #103 |
104. Wow, a double dose this morning thanks - nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hack89
![]() |
Sun Jun-28-09 06:48 AM Response to Reply #100 |
106. Learn something about vectors and you will see your mistake. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LARED
![]() |
Sun Jun-28-09 07:09 AM Response to Reply #106 |
109. I would suggest he start with a proper understanding |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ghost in the Machine
![]() |
Mon Jun-29-09 02:12 PM Response to Reply #106 |
116. Learn something about construction and get back with me.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wildbilln864
![]() |
Sun Jun-28-09 12:34 AM Response to Reply #82 |
101. I guess.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hack89
![]() |
Sun Jun-28-09 06:45 AM Response to Reply #55 |
105. But it was still within the foot print of the building. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AZCat
![]() |
Tue Jun-23-09 08:22 AM Response to Original message |
18. I found this charming little sidebar on page 5. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SidDithers
![]() |
Mon Jun-29-09 11:08 AM Response to Original message |
115. ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wildbilln864
![]() |
Wed Jul-01-09 06:40 PM Response to Reply #115 |
117. !!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Sat Jun 15th 2024, 10:37 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » September 11 |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC