|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
boston bean (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-20-07 07:31 PM Original message |
Pelosi working on Bush Impeachment? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
robinlynne (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-20-07 07:36 PM Response to Original message |
1. I don't think so. I went to a meeting this morning with at least 20 people who were |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MonkeyFunk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-20-07 08:09 PM Response to Reply #1 |
8. Pelosi can't be impeached |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Froward69 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-20-07 08:17 PM Response to Reply #8 |
9. I think it depends on the state. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MonkeyFunk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-20-07 08:35 PM Response to Reply #9 |
14. No governor can replace a Senator at will. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Baby Snooks (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-20-07 10:01 PM Response to Reply #8 |
22. Shame she can't be... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TreasonousBastard (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-20-07 10:02 PM Response to Reply #8 |
23. Shows the sophistication of the anti-Pelosi crowd. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
acmavm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-21-07 06:15 AM Response to Reply #23 |
29. What exactly are you saying? People fed up with Pelosi's enabling |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TreasonousBastard (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-21-07 06:46 AM Response to Reply #29 |
32. What I'm saying exactly is... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
acmavm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-21-07 10:24 AM Response to Reply #32 |
35. I don't know about a wasted day, but I sure did waste a little bit of time |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HamdenRice (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-21-07 05:31 AM Response to Reply #8 |
27. They used the wrong word, but she can be removed |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MonkeyFunk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-21-07 05:58 AM Response to Reply #27 |
28. I don't know how it works? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HamdenRice (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-21-07 06:16 AM Response to Reply #28 |
30. So you agree she can be removed? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MonkeyFunk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-21-07 08:28 AM Response to Reply #30 |
33. Of course she can removed by the House |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HamdenRice (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-21-07 09:22 AM Response to Reply #33 |
34. Wrong again |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MonkeyFunk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-21-07 10:26 AM Response to Reply #34 |
36. sigh |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HamdenRice (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-21-07 11:27 AM Response to Reply #36 |
37. Uhhhh, who's being rude? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MonkeyFunk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-21-07 04:38 PM Response to Reply #37 |
39. What on Earth was I wrong about? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HamdenRice (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-22-07 07:52 AM Response to Reply #39 |
41. huh? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
babylonsister (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-20-07 07:36 PM Response to Original message |
2. Here's the video to go with that: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
robinlynne (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-20-07 07:45 PM Response to Original message |
3. Just saw the video. What she says is that Pelosi's strategy is a Democratic sweep in the |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
boston bean (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-20-07 07:46 PM Response to Reply #3 |
4. Well, I hope they do. She has been a grave disappointment. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
allisonthegreat (586 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-20-07 07:53 PM Response to Reply #4 |
5. just a little more than a mild disappointment n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bellasgrams (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-20-07 09:36 PM Response to Reply #4 |
20. How in the world do you expect to Impeach |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
surfermaw (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-21-07 06:33 PM Response to Reply #20 |
40. That is what I would like to know is how they expect miricles |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dflprincess (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-20-07 08:24 PM Response to Reply #3 |
11. I trust she's not including Liebermann in that 60 Senate seats tally |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AtomicKitten (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-20-07 07:54 PM Response to Original message |
6. Fifth K&R because I wish it to be so. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
man4allcats (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-20-07 08:01 PM Response to Original message |
7. Misplaced priorities |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sampsonblk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-20-07 08:17 PM Response to Original message |
10. If she weren't working so 'quietly and effectively' we could have the votes! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bellasgrams (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-20-07 09:52 PM Response to Reply #10 |
21. Talking about impeaching Bill and finally doing it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sampsonblk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-20-07 10:11 PM Response to Reply #21 |
24. Apples and oranges: All 'high crimes' are not created equal |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sarah Ibarruri (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-20-07 08:30 PM Response to Original message |
12. She would never do that. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
yodermon (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-20-07 08:35 PM Response to Original message |
13. "prosecution of George Bush after he’s left office" BWAHAHA. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
eallen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-20-07 08:36 PM Response to Original message |
15. There's no provision for impeaching a former president. Just criminal prosecution. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HamdenRice (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-21-07 06:25 AM Response to Reply #15 |
31. I thought those passages were completely creepy! It's like they're expecting a repug president |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madfloridian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-20-07 08:37 PM Response to Original message |
16. Damn...they had 341 yes votes to condemn MoveOn. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mzmolly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-20-07 08:46 PM Response to Reply #16 |
18. Heh |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sampsonblk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-20-07 10:12 PM Response to Reply #16 |
25. Ain't that something? It was quick too. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mzmolly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-20-07 08:45 PM Response to Original message |
17. We don't need the votes to bring impeachment charges. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lochloosa (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-20-07 08:49 PM Response to Original message |
19. 2008? And who are you going to impeach? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dewlso (74 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-20-07 10:22 PM Response to Original message |
26. Quit quietly talking about it and DO SOMETHING ALREADY |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LWolf (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-21-07 12:21 PM Response to Original message |
38. That "quietly working behind the scenes" is |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Sat Jun 15th 2024, 03:42 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC