|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) |
![]() |
KittyWampus
![]() |
Sat May-13-06 08:52 AM Original message |
Why don't we just hire more Border Agents to patrol the Mexican border? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
crikkett
![]() |
Sat May-13-06 08:55 AM Response to Original message |
1. they're only gonna post soldiers until we can hire/train our own guards |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
woodsprite
![]() |
Sat May-13-06 08:56 AM Response to Original message |
2. Yes, but it doesn't achieve the hidden agenda and that's to get |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
C_U_L8R
![]() |
Sat May-13-06 08:57 AM Response to Original message |
3. Cause Bush doesn't want to pay for it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mmonk
![]() |
Sat May-13-06 08:57 AM Response to Original message |
4. Not militarized enough |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Minnesota Libra
![]() |
Sat May-13-06 08:58 AM Response to Original message |
5. I am convinced that using the National Guard is merely a start............ |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
genie_weenie
![]() |
Sat May-13-06 09:21 AM Response to Reply #5 |
10. Yikes! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Warpy
![]() |
Sat May-13-06 08:58 AM Response to Original message |
6. INS agents cost money and require training |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KittyWampus
![]() |
Sat May-13-06 09:02 AM Response to Reply #6 |
8. So we can attack Bush for being CHEAP ON NATIONAL SECURITY? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Warpy
![]() |
Sat May-13-06 09:24 AM Response to Reply #8 |
11. Yes. Lots of windowdressing and misallocated resources |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
itzamirakul
![]() |
Sat May-13-06 08:59 AM Response to Original message |
7. Probably because the government would end up hiring illegals to do |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Botany
![]() |
Sat May-13-06 09:06 AM Response to Original message |
9. Why don't we do it on the cheap? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OmmmSweetOmmm
![]() |
Sat May-13-06 09:27 AM Response to Original message |
12. I think this a ploy to deflect from the NSA data mining. It seems that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JuniperLea
![]() |
Sat May-13-06 09:37 AM Response to Reply #12 |
14. Yep! They are playing emotional warfare |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OmmmSweetOmmm
![]() |
Sat May-13-06 10:35 AM Response to Reply #14 |
15. And those buttons and keyboards have Rovian fingerprints! :) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jeffersons Ghost
![]() |
Sat May-13-06 09:33 AM Response to Original message |
13. because your logical idea does not allow a BUSH TO THE RESCUE SCENARIO |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Sat Jun 15th 2024, 07:58 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC