|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
![]() |
Mari333
![]() |
Sun Jan-03-10 10:08 PM Original message |
Video of what the new body scanners at airports can see |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jwirr
![]() |
Sun Jan-03-10 10:12 PM Response to Original message |
1. I am assuming these things use ex-ray. Don't our doctors tell us it is |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
femmocrat
![]() |
Sun Jan-03-10 10:15 PM Response to Reply #1 |
3. I heard they use radio waves, not X-rays. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Taitertots
![]() |
Tue Jan-05-10 01:14 AM Response to Reply #3 |
33. Does putting a shirt over your radio stop it from working? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SoCalNative
![]() |
Sun Jan-03-10 10:14 PM Response to Original message |
2. This has some serious implications |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LisaL
![]() |
Sun Jan-03-10 11:26 PM Response to Reply #2 |
15. And celebrities. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
progressoid
![]() |
Sun Jan-03-10 11:44 PM Response to Reply #15 |
19. TMZ will have a heydey. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
femmocrat
![]() |
Sun Jan-03-10 10:18 PM Response to Original message |
4. Wow--- They don't show THAT on the TV simulations! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pnwmom
![]() |
Sun Jan-03-10 10:36 PM Response to Reply #4 |
9. The person viewing them will be doing it in a separate room and won't be |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BeatleBoot
![]() |
Sun Jan-03-10 10:25 PM Response to Original message |
5. I don't have a problem with it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HipChick
![]() |
Sun Jan-03-10 10:27 PM Response to Reply #5 |
6. I see people dressed more or less half naked as is...I don't see the issue with it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SoCalNative
![]() |
Sun Jan-03-10 10:29 PM Response to Reply #6 |
8. You just might |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pnwmom
![]() |
Sun Jan-03-10 10:37 PM Response to Reply #8 |
10. The person doing the viewing will be in another room and won't be able |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SoCalNative
![]() |
Sun Jan-03-10 10:51 PM Response to Reply #10 |
12. If something looks strange to the screener |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pnwmom
![]() |
Mon Jan-04-10 04:56 AM Response to Reply #12 |
22. What I meant is that the person doing the screening won't see the real face |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Shallah Kali
![]() |
Sun Jan-03-10 11:30 PM Response to Reply #10 |
16. so any pervs will be generically getting kicks |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pnwmom
![]() |
Mon Jan-04-10 04:57 AM Response to Reply #16 |
23. Then I suppose you'll be choosing a pat down search instead. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dysfunctional press
![]() |
Mon Jan-04-10 10:24 AM Response to Reply #16 |
27. would it bother you to have someone with a foot fetish selling you shoes? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seabeyond
![]() |
Sun Jan-03-10 10:44 PM Response to Reply #6 |
11. you are seeing the penis flop around walking down the street? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Donnachaidh
![]() |
Sun Jan-03-10 10:29 PM Response to Original message |
7. how does that effect implanted devices? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BrightKnight
![]() |
Sun Jan-03-10 11:05 PM Response to Original message |
13. I would rather watch a plane explode than let someone see my buttocks. - n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Stinky The Clown
![]() |
Sun Jan-03-10 11:19 PM Response to Original message |
14. A few comments |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Fire_Medic_Dave
![]() |
Sun Jan-03-10 11:38 PM Response to Reply #14 |
18. At least it wasn't a condom. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
demosincebirth
![]() |
Sun Jan-03-10 11:36 PM Response to Original message |
17. They ought to put those of us who don't mind being body scanned |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Shallah Kali
![]() |
Sun Jan-03-10 11:51 PM Response to Original message |
20. They can see one's naughty bits but cannot see the chemicals the crotch-bomber used - link |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LisaL
![]() |
Mon Jan-04-10 12:00 AM Response to Reply #20 |
21. If these scanners can not see explosives such as the |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JoeyT
![]() |
Mon Jan-04-10 07:30 AM Response to Reply #20 |
25. That pretty much sums it up |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ChicagoSuz219
![]() |
Mon Jan-04-10 05:56 AM Response to Original message |
24. HaHaHa |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nenagh
![]() |
Mon Jan-04-10 08:36 AM Response to Original message |
26. Stephen Harper, Canadian Prime Minister.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dysfunctional press
![]() |
Mon Jan-04-10 10:26 AM Response to Original message |
28. i still don't understand why people are so freaked out by this... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
alstephenson
![]() |
Mon Jan-04-10 01:30 PM Response to Reply #28 |
30. Huh??? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dysfunctional press
![]() |
Mon Jan-04-10 01:33 PM Response to Reply #30 |
31. you're entitled to your opinion. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BrightKnight
![]() |
Tue Jan-05-10 02:43 AM Response to Reply #28 |
34. The lead burka society is out in force. - n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hunter
![]() |
Mon Jan-04-10 11:25 AM Response to Original message |
29. I have some great ideas for "image enhancing" underwear... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BrightKnight
![]() |
Tue Jan-05-10 12:34 AM Response to Reply #29 |
32. Fundi Undies - A kit to die for. -n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mmonk
![]() |
Tue Jan-05-10 06:43 AM Response to Original message |
35. I've got an idea. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Sat Jun 15th 2024, 10:57 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC