|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency |
craigmatic (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-22-10 06:36 PM Original message |
Newsweek poll Obama approval numbers up and dems close enthusiasm gap |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Phx_Dem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-22-10 06:44 PM Response to Original message |
1. 54 percent approval? Think we'll hear anything about it from the assholes on cable? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Thrill (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-22-10 06:46 PM Response to Reply #1 |
2. Not a chance |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
craigmatic (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-22-10 06:49 PM Response to Reply #1 |
3. Nope the lazy media has their narrative and they're just going to stick with it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Liberal_Stalwart71 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-22-10 08:24 PM Response to Reply #1 |
17. CNN headline story while in the gym this evening: "Category 4 for Democrats"!!!! n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FBaggins (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-22-10 09:55 PM Response to Reply #17 |
47. The reason that made the news is that it was Peter Hart that said it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Liberal_Stalwart71 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-22-10 10:28 PM Response to Reply #47 |
51. But they weren't optimistic; they were declaring that the Democrats are losing BIG! n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Imajika (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-22-10 06:56 PM Response to Original message |
4. Newsweek's pollster must be doing things a lot differently... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tarheel_Dem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-22-10 06:56 PM Response to Original message |
5. Oh my damn! The next sound you hear will be that of Hannity's head exploding. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Arugula Latte (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-22-10 07:13 PM Response to Original message |
6. Quick! Someone get a media suicide watch going! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RBInMaine (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-22-10 07:15 PM Response to Original message |
7. Gee, AP would disagree. But then again, PISS ON AP ! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jenmito (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-22-10 07:18 PM Response to Original message |
8. Olbermann just mentioned it to Larry Scanlon, Political Director of AFSCME, who wasn't suprised! n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DrToast (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-22-10 07:23 PM Response to Original message |
9. 48-45 Democrats ahead in LIKELY voters |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FBaggins (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-22-10 08:07 PM Response to Reply #9 |
15. Kinda sorta "likely" (edited) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tritsofme (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-22-10 07:39 PM Response to Original message |
10. This poll had Dems at +16 before election day 2006 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Imajika (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-22-10 07:52 PM Response to Reply #10 |
11. Yeah, but who was doing Newsweek's polling then? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Politics_Guy25 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-22-10 07:59 PM Response to Reply #11 |
12. 54% approval rocks-my god |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FBaggins (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-22-10 08:01 PM Response to Reply #11 |
13. Princeton Survey Research Associates was their pollster both years. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Imajika (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-22-10 08:14 PM Response to Reply #13 |
16. Interesting... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Beetwasher (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-22-10 08:33 PM Response to Reply #16 |
18. Yup, Seem There Must Be Some SERIOUS Differences In The "Likely Voter" Screens, Huh? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FBaggins (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-22-10 08:38 PM Response to Reply #18 |
19. Makes you wonder what exactly? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Beetwasher (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-22-10 08:40 PM Response to Reply #19 |
20. Makes Me Wonder What Those Differences Are. Why Are You So Incurious? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FBaggins (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-22-10 08:44 PM Response to Reply #20 |
24. One positive possibility |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Beetwasher (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-22-10 08:47 PM Response to Reply #24 |
27. Thanks For The Info, Scrappy! Gee, Not Like Polling Cell Phones Would Make ANY Difference |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FBaggins (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-22-10 08:51 PM Response to Reply #27 |
30. THAT big a difference? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Beetwasher (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-22-10 08:53 PM Response to Reply #30 |
31. That Plus Differences In Likely Voter Screens, Duh |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProSense (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-22-10 08:40 PM Response to Reply #19 |
21. So this is a bad poll and the others were good? n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FBaggins (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-22-10 08:43 PM Response to Reply #21 |
22. Which "bad" and "good" are we talking about? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Beetwasher (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-22-10 08:44 PM Response to Reply #22 |
23. Did They Poll Cell Phones? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FBaggins (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-22-10 08:46 PM Response to Reply #23 |
25. Some did and some didn't. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Beetwasher (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-22-10 08:47 PM Response to Reply #25 |
28. Really? Which One's Did? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FBaggins (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-22-10 09:02 PM Response to Reply #28 |
33. Gallup. Pew. NYTimes. ABC/WAPost. Heard of any of them? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Beetwasher (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-22-10 09:06 PM Response to Reply #33 |
34. Good Job Scrappy! Then We've Narrowed It Down To Differences In Likely Voter Screens |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FBaggins (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-22-10 09:19 PM Response to Reply #34 |
38. We've "narrowed it down" to exactly what I started with? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Beetwasher (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-22-10 09:21 PM Response to Reply #38 |
39. No, Scrappy, YOU DO Assume Gallup Is Right And Newsweek Is Wrong, Because You ALWAYS Assume Dems |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FBaggins (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-22-10 09:36 PM Response to Reply #39 |
42. Welcome to bizarro world friends. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Beetwasher (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-22-10 09:38 PM Response to Reply #42 |
43. You're So Cute, Scrappy! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FBaggins (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-22-10 09:42 PM Response to Reply #43 |
45. All? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Beetwasher (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-22-10 09:49 PM Response to Reply #45 |
46. LOL! There's NO MOMENTUM!!!! Who Ate My Scooby Snacks??!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FBaggins (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-22-10 09:59 PM Response to Reply #46 |
48. So how many is "all"? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Beetwasher (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-22-10 10:02 PM Response to Reply #48 |
49. LOL! THERE'S NO MOMENTUM!!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FBaggins (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-22-10 10:11 PM Response to Reply #49 |
50. Surreal. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Beetwasher (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-23-10 08:59 AM Response to Reply #50 |
52. Hey Everyone! Scrappy Doo Says NO MOMENTUM! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FBaggins (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-23-10 11:07 AM Response to Reply #52 |
53. I suppose it would be a waste of time... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Beetwasher (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-23-10 11:15 AM Response to Reply #53 |
54. Scrappy, You're So Adorable! Using Puppy Power! To Deny Dem Momentum! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FBaggins (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-23-10 12:07 PM Response to Reply #54 |
55. A simple "Yes, it would be a waste of time" would have sufficed. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Beetwasher (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-23-10 01:54 PM Response to Reply #55 |
57. Conversely You Can Just Admit The Dems Have Momentum Instead Of Relying on Puppy POWER! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProSense (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-22-10 08:47 PM Response to Reply #22 |
26. "This would be pretty good news if there was reason to believe that it was accurate." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FBaggins (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-22-10 09:13 PM Response to Reply #26 |
35. Why? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProSense (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-22-10 09:16 PM Response to Reply #35 |
36. NBC/WSJ |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Beetwasher (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-22-10 09:19 PM Response to Reply #36 |
37. As Far As I'm Concerned Enough Of The Polls Show The Same TRAJECTORY |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FBaggins (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-22-10 09:30 PM Response to Reply #37 |
40. How can you say that with a straight face? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Beetwasher (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-22-10 09:32 PM Response to Reply #40 |
41. Aww, Poor Scrappy, Can't Stand It That Dems May Not Do As Badly As Gallup Says! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
beaglelover (107 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-22-10 08:49 PM Response to Reply #19 |
29. They included cellphones |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FBaggins (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-22-10 09:39 PM Response to Reply #29 |
44. That's a common error. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kind of Blue (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-22-10 08:02 PM Response to Original message |
14. Fantastic! I knew as soon as our president got |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
impik (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-22-10 08:53 PM Response to Original message |
32. Of course. He is awesome. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Aramchek (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-23-10 12:34 PM Response to Original message |
56. this poll shows a Repuke enthusiasm gap. Imagine that. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AtomicKitten (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-23-10 02:28 PM Response to Original message |
58. Those figures are tough to ignore but I'm sure the MSM will give it their best shot. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Sun Jun 16th 2024, 09:02 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC